Home Cart Sign in  
Chemical Structure| 1664-57-9 Chemical Structure| 1664-57-9
Chemical Structure| 1664-57-9

3-(3-Nitrophenyl)propionic acid

CAS No.: 1664-57-9

4.5 *For Research Use Only !

Cat. No.: A146716 Purity: 98%

Change View

Size Price

US Stock

Global Stock

In Stock
250mg łÇʶÊÊ Inquiry Inquiry
5g łÇ˶ÊÊ Inquiry Inquiry
10g łÇÿ¶ÊÊ Inquiry Inquiry
25g łÇó¶ÊÊ Inquiry Inquiry
100g łòʶÊÊ Inquiry Inquiry
500g łËòʶÊÊ Inquiry Inquiry

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

  • 250mg

    łÇʶÊÊ

  • 5g

    łÇ˶ÊÊ

  • 10g

    łÇÿ¶ÊÊ

  • 25g

    łÇó¶ÊÊ

  • 100g

    łòʶÊÊ

  • 500g

    łËòʶÊÊ

In Stock

- +

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

  • 1-2 Day Shipping
  • High Quality
  • Technical Support Online Technical Q&A
Product Citations

Product Citations

Anushree Mondal ; Pronay Roy ; Jaclyn Carrannatto ; Prathamesh M. Datar ; Daniel J. DiRocco ; Katherine Huntera and E. Neil G. Marsh

Abstract: The prenylated-flavin mononucleotide-dependent decarboxylases (also known as UbiD-like enzymes) are the most recently discovered family of decarboxylases. The modified flavin facilitates the decarboxylation of unsaturated carboxylic acids through a novel mechanism involving 1,3-dipolar cyclo-addition chemistry. UbiD-like enzymes have attracted considerable interest for biocatalysis applications due to their ability to catalyse (de)carboxylation reactions on a broad range of aromatic substrates at otherwise unreactive carbon centres. There are now ∼35[thin space (1/6-em)]000 protein sequences annotated as hypothetical UbiD-like enzymes. Sequence similarity network analyses of the UbiD protein family suggests that there are likely dozens of distinct decarboxylase enzymes represented within this family. Furthermore, many of the enzymes so far characterized can decarboxylate a broad range of substrates. Here we describe a strategy to identify potential substrates of UbiD-like enzymes based on detecting enzyme-catalysed solvent deuterium exchange into potential substrates. Using ferulic acid decarboxylase (FDC) as a model system, we tested a diverse range of aromatic and heterocyclic molecules for their ability to undergo enzyme-catalysed H/D exchange in deuterated buffer. We found that FDC catalyses H/D exchange, albeit at generally very low levels, into a wide range of small, aromatic molecules that have little resemblance to its physiological substrate. In contrast, the sub-set of aromatic carboxylic acids that are substrates for FDC-catalysed decarboxylation is much smaller. We discuss the implications of these findings for screening uncharacterized UbiD-like enzymes for novel (de)carboxylase activity.

Alternative Products

Product Details of [ 1664-57-9 ]

CAS No. :1664-57-9
Formula : C9H9NO4
M.W : 195.17
SMILES Code : [N+](=O)([O-])C1=CC=CC(=C1)CCC(=O)O
MDL No. :MFCD01310835
InChI Key :ZOANOABZUNJOJT-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Pubchem ID :2760224

Safety of [ 1664-57-9 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:Warning
Hazard Statements:H302-H315-H319-H332-H335
Precautionary Statements:P261-P280-P305+P351+P338

Calculated chemistry of [ 1664-57-9 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms 14
Num. arom. heavy atoms 6
Fraction Csp3 0.22
Num. rotatable bonds 4
Num. H-bond acceptors 4.0
Num. H-bond donors 1.0
Molar Refractivity 51.62
TPSA ?

Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from
Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.

83.12 Ų

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP)?

iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from
Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

1.14
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)?

XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by
XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry

1.84
Log Po/w (WLOGP)?

WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from
Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

1.61
Log Po/w (MLOGP)?

MLOGP: Topological method implemented from
Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.

0.89
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-0.25
Consensus Log Po/w?

Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions

1.05

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):?

ESOL: Topological method implemented from
Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-2.26
Solubility 1.07 mg/ml ; 0.00547 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble
Log S (Ali)?

Ali: Topological method implemented from
Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-3.21
Solubility 0.121 mg/ml ; 0.000622 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-1.97
Solubility 2.12 mg/ml ; 0.0108 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption?

Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg

High
BBB permeant?

BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg

No
P-gp substrate?

P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set)
and tested on 415 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77
External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94

No
CYP1A2 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90
External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91

Yes
CYP2C19 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86
External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP2C9 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2075 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81

No
CYP2D6 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set)
and tested on 1068 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP3A4 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2579 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86

No
Log Kp (skin permeation)?

Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from
Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.

-6.18 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski?

Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from
Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
MW ≤ 500
MLOGP ≤ 4.15
N or O ≤ 10
NH or OH ≤ 5

0.0
Ghose?

Ghose filter: implemented from
Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem.
160 ≤ MW ≤ 480
-0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6
40 ≤ MR ≤ 130
20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70

None
Veber?

Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from
Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.
Rotatable bonds ≤ 10
TPSA ≤ 140

0.0
Egan?

Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from
Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.
WLOGP ≤ 5.88
TPSA ≤ 131.6

0.0
Muegge?

Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from
Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem.
200 ≤ MW ≤ 600
-2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5
TPSA ≤ 150
Num. rings ≤ 7
Num. carbon > 4
Num. heteroatoms > 1
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15
H-bond acc. ≤ 10
H-bond don. ≤ 5

1.0
Bioavailability Score?

Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat
implemented from
Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.

0.56

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS?

Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from
Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.

0.0 alert
Brenk?

Structural Alert: implemented from
Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem

2.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness?

Leadlikeness: implemented from
Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
250 ≤ MW ≤ 350
XLOGP ≤ 3.5
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7

No; 1 violation:MW<1.0
Synthetic accessibility?

Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult)
based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties,
trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r2 = 0.94)

1.67

Application In Synthesis of [ 1664-57-9 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 1664-57-9 ]

[ 1664-57-9 ] Synthesis Path-Downstream   1~2

  • 1
  • [ 501-52-0 ]
  • [ 16642-79-8 ]
  • [ 1664-57-9 ]
  • [ 2001-32-3 ]
  • 2
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 1664-57-9 ]
  • [ 22768-05-4 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
With thionyl chloride; at 60.0℃; for 2.0h; To a solution of above product (1.0 eq) in MeOH (0.74 M) was added SOCb (2.0 eq) at RT. The resulting mixture was stirred at 60 C for 2 h. Then the mixture was cooled down to r.t, concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was diluted withH20 (150 mL), and extracted with EtOAc (2x50 mL). The organic phase was washed with sat. aq NaHCOs (2x20 mL), dried over Na2S04, concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (eluent: petroleum ether/EtOAc 10:1) to give the title compound as a white solid.
With hydrogenchloride; at 60.0℃; for 1.0h; A mixture of intermediate 1 (5 g, 25.62 mmol, 1 eq) and HCl/MeOH (50 mL) was heated to 60 C, and the mixture was stirred at 60 C for 1 h. The reaction was monitored by LCMS and when omplete, the reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo to yield intermediate 2 (5.3 g, crude) was obtained as a white solid. LCMS: m/z = 210.1 (M+H+), 1H-NMR: (400 MHz, DMSO-de) δ 8.10 (s, 1 H) 8.05 (dd, >8.13, 1.65 Hz, 1 H) 7.71 (d, >7.58 Hz, 1 H) 7.53 - 7.61 (m, 1 H) 3.57 s, 3 H) 2.94- 3.03 (m, 2 H) 2.66 - 2.75 (m, 2 H).
With hydrogenchloride; at 60.0℃; for 1.0h; A mixture of intermediate 1 (5 g, 25.62 mmol, 1 eq) and HCl/MeOH (50 mL) was heated to 60 C, and the mixture was stirred at 60 C for 1 h. The reaction was monitored by LCMS and when omplete, the reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo to yield intermediate 2 (5.3 g, crude) was obtained as a white solid. LCMS: m/z = 210.1 (M+H+), 1H-NMR: (400 MHz, DMSO-de) δ 8.10 (s, 1 H) 8.05 (dd, >8.13, 1.65 Hz, 1 H) 7.71 (d, >7.58 Hz, 1 H) 7.53 - 7.61 (m, 1 H) 3.57 s, 3 H) 2.94- 3.03 (m, 2 H) 2.66 - 2.75 (m, 2 H).
 

Historical Records

Technical Information

Categories

Related Functional Groups of
[ 1664-57-9 ]

Aryls

Chemical Structure| 16642-79-8

A182851 [16642-79-8]

3-(4-Nitrophenyl)propanoic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 104-03-0

A113634 [104-03-0]

4-Nitrophenylacetic acid

Similarity: 0.96

Chemical Structure| 1877-73-2

A129140 [1877-73-2]

(3-Nitrophenyl)acetic acid

Similarity: 0.96

Chemical Structure| 23876-18-8

A372688 [23876-18-8]

2-(2-Methyl-6-nitrophenyl)acetic acid

Similarity: 0.94

Chemical Structure| 287119-83-9

A560582 [287119-83-9]

2-(2-Methyl-5-nitrophenyl)acetic acid

Similarity: 0.94

Carboxylic Acids

Chemical Structure| 16642-79-8

A182851 [16642-79-8]

3-(4-Nitrophenyl)propanoic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 104-03-0

A113634 [104-03-0]

4-Nitrophenylacetic acid

Similarity: 0.96

Chemical Structure| 1877-73-2

A129140 [1877-73-2]

(3-Nitrophenyl)acetic acid

Similarity: 0.96

Chemical Structure| 23876-18-8

A372688 [23876-18-8]

2-(2-Methyl-6-nitrophenyl)acetic acid

Similarity: 0.94

Chemical Structure| 287119-83-9

A560582 [287119-83-9]

2-(2-Methyl-5-nitrophenyl)acetic acid

Similarity: 0.94

Nitroes

Chemical Structure| 16642-79-8

A182851 [16642-79-8]

3-(4-Nitrophenyl)propanoic acid

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 104-03-0

A113634 [104-03-0]

4-Nitrophenylacetic acid

Similarity: 0.96

Chemical Structure| 1877-73-2

A129140 [1877-73-2]

(3-Nitrophenyl)acetic acid

Similarity: 0.96

Chemical Structure| 23876-18-8

A372688 [23876-18-8]

2-(2-Methyl-6-nitrophenyl)acetic acid

Similarity: 0.94

Chemical Structure| 287119-83-9

A560582 [287119-83-9]

2-(2-Methyl-5-nitrophenyl)acetic acid

Similarity: 0.94