Home Cart 0 Sign in  
X

[ CAS No. 768-60-5 ] {[proInfo.proName]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]}
3d Animation Molecule Structure of 768-60-5
Chemical Structure| 768-60-5
Chemical Structure| 768-60-5
Structure of 768-60-5 * Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
Cart0 Add to My Favorites Add to My Favorites Bulk Inquiry Inquiry Add To Cart

Quality Control of [ 768-60-5 ]

Related Doc. of [ 768-60-5 ]

Alternatived Products of [ 768-60-5 ]

Product Details of [ 768-60-5 ]

CAS No. :768-60-5 MDL No. :MFCD00168815
Formula : C9H8O Boiling Point : -
Linear Structure Formula :- InChI Key :KBIAVTUACPKPFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
M.W : 132.16 Pubchem ID :251020
Synonyms :

Calculated chemistry of [ 768-60-5 ]

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms : 10
Num. arom. heavy atoms : 6
Fraction Csp3 : 0.11
Num. rotatable bonds : 1
Num. H-bond acceptors : 1.0
Num. H-bond donors : 0.0
Molar Refractivity : 40.87
TPSA : 9.23 Ų

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption : High
BBB permeant : Yes
P-gp substrate : No
CYP1A2 inhibitor : Yes
CYP2C19 inhibitor : No
CYP2C9 inhibitor : No
CYP2D6 inhibitor : No
CYP3A4 inhibitor : No
Log Kp (skin permeation) : -5.3 cm/s

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP) : 2.32
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : 2.54
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : 1.76
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : 2.37
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : 2.46
Consensus Log Po/w : 2.29

Druglikeness

Lipinski : 0.0
Ghose : None
Veber : 0.0
Egan : 0.0
Muegge : 2.0
Bioavailability Score : 0.55

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL) : -2.64
Solubility : 0.304 mg/ml ; 0.0023 mol/l
Class : Soluble
Log S (Ali) : -2.38
Solubility : 0.55 mg/ml ; 0.00416 mol/l
Class : Soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : -2.57
Solubility : 0.354 mg/ml ; 0.00268 mol/l
Class : Soluble

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS : 0.0 alert
Brenk : 1.0 alert
Leadlikeness : 1.0
Synthetic accessibility : 1.38

Safety of [ 768-60-5 ]

Signal Word:Warning Class:N/A
Precautionary Statements:P261-P305+P351+P338 UN#:N/A
Hazard Statements:H315-H319-H335 Packing Group:N/A
GHS Pictogram:

Application In Synthesis of [ 768-60-5 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Upstream synthesis route of [ 768-60-5 ]
  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 768-60-5 ]

[ 768-60-5 ] Synthesis Path-Upstream   1~19

  • 1
  • [ 3167-62-2 ]
  • [ 123-11-5 ]
  • [ 3167-63-3 ]
  • [ 477727-71-2 ]
  • [ 123098-29-3 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
Reference: [1] Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 1989, vol. 67, p. 1332 - 1343
  • 2
  • [ 3167-62-2 ]
  • [ 123-11-5 ]
  • [ 3167-63-3 ]
  • [ 18684-79-2 ]
  • [ 18684-94-1 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
Reference: [1] Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 1989, vol. 67, p. 1332 - 1343
  • 3
  • [ 201230-82-2 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 1929-29-9 ]
  • [ 942-54-1 ]
Reference: [1] Tetrahedron Letters, 1991, vol. 32, # 15, p. 1769 - 1770
  • 4
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 1929-29-9 ]
Reference: [1] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2015, vol. 21, # 46, p. 16387 - 16390
  • 5
  • [ 79-22-1 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 7515-17-5 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Letters, 2013, vol. 15, # 18, p. 4742 - 4745
[2] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2018, vol. 360, # 16, p. 3171 - 3175
[3] European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2008, # 1, p. 47 - 51
[4] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2012, vol. 18, # 10, p. 2777 - 2782
[5] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2015, vol. 357, # 18, p. 3961 - 3968
[6] Organic Letters, 2017, vol. 19, # 20, p. 5497 - 5500
[7] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2018, vol. 360, # 11, p. 2204 - 2210
  • 6
  • [ 67-56-1 ]
  • [ 201230-82-2 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 7515-17-5 ]
Reference: [1] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2016, vol. 358, # 20, p. 3244 - 3253
  • 7
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 7515-17-5 ]
Reference: [1] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2018, vol. 24, # 23, p. 6019 - 6024
  • 8
  • [ 500-05-0 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 725-14-4 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
44% for 36 h; Reflux (a) 4'-Methoxybiphenyl-4-carboxylic acid (7b).; Method A.Coumalic acid (1.06 g, 7.56 mmol) and 4-ethylnyl anisole were dissolved in diglyme and brought to reflux for 36h. The reaction was then allowed to cool and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The resultant slurry was then recrystallized from ethanol to yield 754 mg (44percent) of a light tan solid.
Reference: [1] Patent: WO2009/146013, 2009, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 52
  • 9
  • [ 644-97-3 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 1447998-70-0 ]
  • [ 43212-67-5 ]
Reference: [1] Dalton Transactions, 2013, vol. 42, # 30, p. 10997 - 11004
  • 10
  • [ 615-43-0 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 157869-15-3 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
93%
Stage #1: With bis-triphenylphosphine-palladium(II) chloride; copper(l) iodide; triethylamine In acetonitrile at 20℃; for 0.5 h; Inert atmosphere
Stage #2: at 20℃; Inert atmosphere
General procedure: 2-iodoaniline (500.2 mg, 2.28 mmol, 1.0 equiv) was dissolved in Et3N (4.5 mL). The resulting solution was added with PdCl2(PPh3)2 (32.1 mg, 0.046 mol, 0.02 equiv) and CuI (17.4 mg, 0.091mmol, 0.04 equiv). The orange-yellow solution was degassed by bubbling with a stream of argon into the solution at room temperature for 30 min. After degassing, phenylacetylene (0.30 mL,279.0 mg, 2.73 mmol, 1.2 equiv) was added as a neat liquid into the solution via syringe. The resulting dark brown solution was allowed to stir at room temperature under argon atmosphere overnight. The reaction was quenched by addition of sat. aq. NH4Cl. The separated aqueousphase was extracted with EtOAc (3x times). The combined organic phases were washed with sat. aq. NaCl, dried over anh. Na2SO4, filtered and concentrated to a crude product. The crudeproduct was purified by SiO2 column chromatography eluting with 0-10percent EtOAc-hexane to give 398.2 mg (90percent) of 2-(phenylethynyl)aniline as an orange solid.
75% With sodium hydroxide In toluene at 130℃; for 72 h; General procedure: To a stirred solution of the corresponding 2-iodoaniline (6, 1 mmol) in toluene (3 mL) under argon atmosphere were added Pd/CuO-Fe3O4 (50 mg), NaOH (400 mg, 10 mmol), and the corresponding alkyne (2, 1.5 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at 130 °C until the end of reaction (see Table 6). The catalyst was removed by a magnet and the resulting mixture was quenched with water and extracted with EtOAc. The organic phases were dried over MgSO4, followed by evaporation under reduced pressure to remove the solvent. The product was purified by chromatography on silica gel (hexane/ethyl acetate) to give the corresponding compounds 7. Yields are included in Table 6. Then, to a stirred solution of 7 (1 mmol) in toluene (4 mL) was added ZnBr2 (225 mg, 1 mmol). The resulting mixture was stirred at 130 °C during 24 h. The mixture was quenched with water and extracted with EtOAc. The organic phases were dried over MgSO4, followed by evaporation under reduced pressure to give the pure products 8 in quantitative yields. Physical and spectroscopic data for compounds 7 and 8, as well as literature for known compounds, follow.
Reference: [1] Dalton Transactions, 2017, vol. 46, # 5, p. 1539 - 1545
[2] Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2018, vol. 32, # 1,
[3] Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2011, vol. 7, p. 565 - 569
[4] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2013, vol. 52, # 45, p. 11835 - 11839[5] Angew. Chem., 2013, vol. 125, # 45, p. 12051 - 12055,5
[6] New Journal of Chemistry, 2018, vol. 42, # 20, p. 16886 - 16890
[7] Tetrahedron Letters, 2018, p. 675 - 680
[8] Liebigs Annalen, 1995, # 5, p. 775 - 780
[9] Applied Organometallic Chemistry, 2014, vol. 28, # 4, p. 298 - 303
[10] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2010, vol. 75, # 10, p. 3412 - 3419
[11] Tetrahedron, 2012, vol. 68, # 5, p. 1393 - 1400
[12] Synthesis, 2009, # 5, p. 829 - 835
[13] ChemMedChem, 2016, vol. 11, # 20, p. 2347 - 2360
[14] Tetrahedron Letters, 2004, vol. 45, # 1, p. 35 - 38
[15] Organic Letters, 2008, vol. 10, # 21, p. 4887 - 4889
[16] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2010, vol. 75, # 21, p. 7502 - 7504
[17] Organic Letters, 2011, vol. 13, # 5, p. 1098 - 1101
[18] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2012, vol. 77, # 1, p. 617 - 625
[19] Tetrahedron Letters, 2013, vol. 54, # 19, p. 2357 - 2361
[20] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2013, vol. 19, # 25, p. 8294 - 8299
[21] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2013, vol. 78, # 20, p. 10319 - 10328
[22] Organic Letters, 2013, vol. 15, # 23, p. 5940 - 5943
[23] Chemical Communications, 2014, vol. 50, # 23, p. 3024 - 3026
[24] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2015, vol. 21, # 8, p. 3193 - 3197
[25] Organic Letters, 2015, vol. 17, # 22, p. 5662 - 5665
[26] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2016, vol. 81, # 10, p. 3994 - 4001
[27] Chemical Communications, 2017, vol. 53, # 1, p. 196 - 199
[28] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2017, vol. 359, # 8, p. 1373 - 1378
[29] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2017, vol. 359, # 11, p. 1844 - 1848
[30] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2018, vol. 360, # 21, p. 4054 - 4059
[31] Chemical Communications, 2017, vol. 53, # 61, p. 8533 - 8536
[32] Chemical Communications, 2017, vol. 53, # 64, p. 8980 - 8983
[33] Organic Letters, 2017, vol. 19, # 15, p. 3982 - 3985
[34] Organic Letters, 2017, vol. 19, # 22, p. 6128 - 6131
[35] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2018, vol. 360, # 18, p. 3460 - 3465
[36] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2017, vol. 82, # 23, p. 12386 - 12394
[37] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2018, vol. 83, # 17, p. 10453 - 10464
[38] Organic Letters, 2018,
  • 11
  • [ 615-36-1 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 157869-15-3 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Letters, 2009, vol. 11, # 16, p. 3598 - 3601
  • 12
  • [ 6630-33-7 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 176910-67-1 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
89% at 50℃; for 3 h; To a solution of 2-bromobenzaldehyde (1.85 g, 10 mmol) and 4- methoxyphenyl acetylene (1.58 g, 12 mmol) in 40 mL of triethylamine were added dichlorobis(triphenylphosphine) palladium(ll) (140 mg, 2 molpercent) and copper(l) iodide (20 mg, 1 molpercent). The reaction mixture was heated at 5O0C under nitrogen for 3 hours. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and the ammonium salt was removed by filtration. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification of the crude compound by column chromatography (SilicaGel 230-400 mesh; 10percent ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent) afforded of 2- (4-methoxy phenylethynyl) benzaldehyde (2.1 g, 89percent).
89% at 50℃; for 3 h; To a solution of 2-bromobenzaldehyde (1.85 g, 10 mmol) and 4-methoxyphenyl acetylene (1.58 g, 12 mmol) in 40 mL of triethylamine were added dichlorobis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) (140 mg, 2 mol percent) and copper (I) iodide (20 mg, 1 mol percent). The reaction mixture was heated at 50° C. under nitrogen for 3 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and the ammonium salt was removed by filtration. The filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure. Purification of the crude compound by column chromatography (silica gel 230-400 mesh; 10percent ethyl acetate in hexanes as eluent) afforded 2-(4-methoxyphenylethynyl)benzaldehyde (2.1 g, 89percent). The above compound (2.06 g, 8.73 mmol) and t-butylamine (3.83 g, 52.4 mmol) were stirred under nitrogen for 24 h at room temperature. The resulting mixture was extracted with ether and the organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated to give the imine (2.4 g, 94percent), which was used in the next step without further purification. To a solution of the above imine (2.39 g, 8.2 mmol) in 100 mL anhydrous DMF was added (0.156 g, 0.82 mmol) copper (I) iodide, and the solution was flushed with nitrogen. The reaction mixture was heated at 100° C. for 4 h. The mixture was cooled to room temperature, and diluted with ether (200 mL). The organic layer was washed with saturated aqueous ammonium chloride (3.x.100 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated to give the crude compound as a dark colored solid. Purification by column chromatography (silica gel 230-400 mesh; 10percent ethylacetate in hexanes as eluent) afforded 3-(4-methoxyphenyl)isoquinoline (1.064 g, 55percent), as a white solid. The 3-(4-methoxyphenyl)isoquinoline (1.05 g, 4.47 mmol) was suspended in 30 mL hydroiodic acid and 12 mL of acetic acid was added. The reaction mixture was stirred at 110° C. for 2 h, then cooled to room temperature. The precipitate formed was filtered off, washed with acetic acid (2.x.5 mL) and dried under vacuum, to give a yellow solid. The crude compound was purified by triturating with 5percent methanol in ether to give 4-isoquinolin-3-yl-phenol (0.83 g, 84percent) as a white powder. Selected data: MS (ES) m/z: 222.89, 221.86; MP 218-219° C.
84% With potassium carbonate In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 100℃; for 13 h; Green chemistry General procedure: A mixture of aryl halide (1mmol), terminal alkyne (1mmol), K2CO3 (2mmol) and MNPFemTriazNHCAg complex (6) (100mg) in DMF (5mL) was stirred at 100°C. The progress of reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion, the reaction mixture was quenched in ice cold water and 6 was separated by external magnet. The reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3×25mL). Evaporation of solvent in vaccuo followed by column chromatography over silica gel using petroleum ether/ethyl acetate afforded desired Sonogashira coupling products.
Reference: [1] Chemical Communications, 2012, vol. 48, # 61, p. 7634 - 7636
[2] ACS Combinatorial Science, 2011, vol. 13, # 3, p. 265 - 271
[3] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2014, vol. 79, # 13, p. 6113 - 6122
[4] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2012, vol. 354, # 4, p. 555 - 562
[5] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2016, vol. 358, # 16, p. 2684 - 2691
[6] European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2017, vol. 2017, # 11, p. 1425 - 1433
[7] Organic and Biomolecular Chemistry, 2017, vol. 15, # 33, p. 6913 - 6920
[8] Tetrahedron, 1999, vol. 55, # 1, p. 29 - 62
[9] Organic letters, 2001, vol. 3, # 25, p. 4035 - 4038
[10] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2002, vol. 67, # 10, p. 3437 - 3444
[11] Patent: WO2007/16525, 2007, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 62-63
[12] Patent: US2008/188467, 2008, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 22
[13] Organic Letters, 2015, vol. 17, # 24, p. 6126 - 6129
[14] Journal of Organometallic Chemistry, 2018, vol. 866, p. 112 - 122
[15] Tetrahedron Letters, 2009, vol. 50, # 33, p. 4706 - 4709
[16] Organic Letters, 2016, vol. 18, # 19, p. 5150 - 5153
[17] Synthesis (Germany), 2013, vol. 45, # 11, p. 1553 - 1563
[18] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2005, vol. 70, # 3, p. 892 - 897
[19] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2003, vol. 68, # 3, p. 920 - 928
[20] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2002, vol. 67, # 20, p. 7042 - 7047
[21] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2007, vol. 72, # 12, p. 4462 - 4468
[22] Chemical Communications, 2010, vol. 46, # 39, p. 7427 - 7429
[23] Organic Letters, 2011, vol. 13, # 4, p. 640 - 643
[24] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2011, vol. 17, # 18, p. 4981 - 4985
[25] Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis, 2012, vol. 354, # 10, p. 1890 - 1896
[26] European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2012, # 24, p. 4590 - 4602
[27] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2012, vol. 51, # 43, p. 10861 - 10865[28] Angew. Chem., 2012, vol. 124, # 43, p. 11019 - 11023
[29] Organic Letters, 2013, vol. 15, # 4, p. 874 - 877
[30] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2013, vol. 19, # 15, p. 4695 - 4700
[31] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2013, vol. 19, # 46, p. 15682 - 15688
[32] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2014, vol. 20, # 9, p. 2425 - 2430
[33] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2014, vol. 20, # 2, p. 390 - 393
[34] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2014, vol. 79, # 8, p. 3494 - 3505
[35] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2015, vol. 21, # 7, p. 3042 - 3052
[36] Organic Letters, 2015, vol. 17, # 16, p. 4018 - 4021
[37] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2014, vol. 79, # 21, p. 10674 - 10681
[38] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2016, vol. 22, # 27, p. 9125 - 9129
[39] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2016, vol. 55, # 39, p. 11882 - 11886[40] Angew. Chem., 2016, vol. 128, p. 12061 - 12065,5
[41] RSC Advances, 2016, vol. 6, # 99, p. 97404 - 97419
[42] European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2016, vol. 2016, # 29, p. 4961 - 4964
[43] Chemical Communications, 2017, vol. 53, # 23, p. 3369 - 3372
[44] Organic Letters, 2017, vol. 19, # 19, p. 5070 - 5073
[45] Heterocycles, 2017, vol. 94, # 10, p. 1847 - 1855
[46] Organic Letters, 2017, vol. 19, # 21, p. 5856 - 5859
[47] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2017, vol. 56, # 49, p. 15570 - 15574[48] Angew. Chem., 2017, vol. 129, p. 15776 - 15780,5
[49] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2017, vol. 82, # 20, p. 11238 - 11246
[50] Organic Letters, 2018, vol. 20, # 16, p. 4815 - 4818
  • 13
  • [ 26260-02-6 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 176910-67-1 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Letters, 2012, vol. 14, # 8, p. 1990 - 1993
[2] Organic Letters, 2014, vol. 16, # 8, p. 2236 - 2239
  • 14
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 176910-67-1 ]
Reference: [1] Synlett, 2004, # 9, p. 1497 - 1502
  • 15
  • [ 615-43-0 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 221910-19-6 ]
Reference: [1] Chemical Communications, 2014, vol. 50, # 23, p. 3024 - 3026
  • 16
  • [ 14337-43-0 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 925006-96-8 ]
Reference: [1] Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2006, vol. 16, # 2, p. 302 - 306
  • 17
  • [ 94569-84-3 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 1042369-35-6 ]
Reference: [1] European Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2017, vol. 2017, # 11, p. 1425 - 1433
[2] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2012, vol. 77, # 16, p. 6689 - 6702
[3] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2016, vol. 22, # 27, p. 9125 - 9129
[4] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2016, vol. 55, # 39, p. 11882 - 11886[5] Angew. Chem., 2016, vol. 128, p. 12061 - 12065,5
  • 18
  • [ 877264-44-3 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 1042369-35-6 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Letters, 2012, vol. 14, # 8, p. 1990 - 1993
  • 19
  • [ 59142-68-6 ]
  • [ 768-60-5 ]
  • [ 1322091-24-6 ]
Reference: [1] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2015, vol. 21, # 41, p. 14401 - 14409
Same Skeleton Products
Historical Records