Home Cart Sign in  
Chemical Structure| 46258-62-2 Chemical Structure| 46258-62-2

Structure of 46258-62-2

Chemical Structure| 46258-62-2

*Storage: {[sel_prStorage]}

*Shipping: {[sel_prShipping]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}

4.5 *For Research Use Only !

{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]} Purity: {[proInfo.pro_purity]}

Change View

Size Price VIP Price

US Stock

Global Stock

In Stock
{[ item.pr_size ]} Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 5-7 days

  • {[ item.pr_size ]}

In Stock

- +

Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

  • 1-2 Day Shipping
  • High Quality
  • Technical Support
Product Citations

Product Citations

Bashar, Noorul ; Kundu, Bidyut Kumar ; Pozdeev, Anton S ; Jiang, De-en ; Sun, Yujie ;

Abstract: Aryl radicals serve as essential intermediates in contemporary organic synthesis, facilitating diverse carbon−carbon and carbon-heteroatom bond-forming reactions under mild conditions. Aryl halides, widely available and frequently employed as precursors for photocatalytic aryl radical generation, typically require photocatalysts with strong reducing capabilities to overcome their high reduction potentials. Herein, we report an innovative approach for the photocatalytic generation of aryl radicals using an organic photocatalyst 5,5′-bis((4-methoxyphenyl)ethynyl)-2,2′-bibenzo[d]thiazole (dBAP) that leverages the proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) mechanism. This strategy allows the selective generation of aryl radicals at the ortho and para positions of aryl halides bearing PCET handles, despite dBAP’s intrinsic reducing power being insufficient for direct electron transfer to the aryl halides, in contrast to the prevalent approaches. Mechanistic investigations highlight the role of PCET in lowering the activation barrier for aryl radical formation, enabling efficient C−H, C−C, and C−B bond-forming reactions with high regioselectivity and functional group tolerance. This work underscores the potential of PCET-driven photocatalysis using organic photocatalysts as a sustainable and versatile platform for expanding the synthetic utility of aryl radicals under ambient conditions.

Purchased from AmBeed: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; 99-91-2

Alternative Products

Product Details of [ 46258-62-2 ]

CAS No. :46258-62-2
Formula : C12H9BrO
M.W : 249.10
SMILES Code : CC(C1=C2C=CC=CC2=C(Br)C=C1)=O
MDL No. :MFCD09037858
Boiling Point : No data available
InChI Key :CSVHMWORIJZGTJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Pubchem ID :230584

Safety of [ 46258-62-2 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:Warning
Hazard Statements:H302-H315-H319
Precautionary Statements:P261-P305+P351+P338

Computational Chemistry of [ 46258-62-2 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms 14
Num. arom. heavy atoms 10
Fraction Csp3 0.08
Num. rotatable bonds 1
Num. H-bond acceptors 1.0
Num. H-bond donors 0.0
Molar Refractivity 61.84
TPSA ?

Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from
Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.

17.07 Ų

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP)?

iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from
Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

2.37
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)?

XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by
XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry

3.55
Log Po/w (WLOGP)?

WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from
Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

3.8
Log Po/w (MLOGP)?

MLOGP: Topological method implemented from
Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.

3.44
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

3.98
Consensus Log Po/w?

Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions

3.43

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):?

ESOL: Topological method implemented from
Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-4.08
Solubility 0.0206 mg/ml ; 0.0000825 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Moderately soluble
Log S (Ali)?

Ali: Topological method implemented from
Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-3.59
Solubility 0.0635 mg/ml ; 0.000255 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-5.27
Solubility 0.00135 mg/ml ; 0.00000542 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Moderately soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption?

Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg

High
BBB permeant?

BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg

Yes
P-gp substrate?

P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set)
and tested on 415 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77
External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94

No
CYP1A2 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90
External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91

Yes
CYP2C19 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86
External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87

Yes
CYP2C9 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2075 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81

No
CYP2D6 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set)
and tested on 1068 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP3A4 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2579 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86

No
Log Kp (skin permeation)?

Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from
Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.

-5.3 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski?

Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from
Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
MW ≤ 500
MLOGP ≤ 4.15
N or O ≤ 10
NH or OH ≤ 5

0.0
Ghose?

Ghose filter: implemented from
Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem.
160 ≤ MW ≤ 480
-0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6
40 ≤ MR ≤ 130
20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70

None
Veber?

Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from
Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.
Rotatable bonds ≤ 10
TPSA ≤ 140

0.0
Egan?

Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from
Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.
WLOGP ≤ 5.88
TPSA ≤ 131.6

0.0
Muegge?

Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from
Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem.
200 ≤ MW ≤ 600
-2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5
TPSA ≤ 150
Num. rings ≤ 7
Num. carbon > 4
Num. heteroatoms > 1
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15
H-bond acc. ≤ 10
H-bond don. ≤ 5

1.0
Bioavailability Score?

Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat
implemented from
Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.

0.55

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS?

Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from
Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.

0.0 alert
Brenk?

Structural Alert: implemented from
Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem

0.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness?

Leadlikeness: implemented from
Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
250 ≤ MW ≤ 350
XLOGP ≤ 3.5
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7

No; 1 violation:MW<2.0
Synthetic accessibility?

Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult)
based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties,
trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r2 = 0.94)

1.22

Application In Synthesis of [ 46258-62-2 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 46258-62-2 ]

[ 46258-62-2 ] Synthesis Path-Downstream   1~35

  • 1
  • [ 20780-76-1 ]
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • 2-(4-bromo-[1]naphthyl)-6-iodo-quinoline-4-carboxylic acid [ No CAS ]
  • 2
  • [ 90-11-9 ]
  • [ 75-36-5 ]
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
91% With aluminum (III) chloride; In 1,2-dichloro-ethane; at 0 - 20℃; for 24h; A solution of 1-Bromo-naphthalene (10 g, 48.3 mmol) and acetyl chloride (4.2 ml, 58 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (100 ml) was cooled to 0C and aluminum chloride (14.4 g, 108 mmol) was added portion wise. The mixture was stirred at RT for 24 hours. The reaction mixture was poured into ice-water (100 ml). The two layers were separated and the water layer was extracted with diethyl ether (3 x 150 ml). The combined organic layers were dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to give an orange colored oil. The 1- (4-bromo-naphtalen-1-yl)-ethanone was purified by flash chromatography (cyclohexane/ethylacetate: 95/5), yielding an yellow oil (91% yield). The 1- (4-bromo-naphtalen-1-yl)-ethanone oxime was prepared according to the procedure described for Compound 22, yielding a white powder (98% yield). Activated zinc dust (24.7 g, 379 mmol) was added portion wise to a suspension of the oxime (10.0 g, 37.9 mmol) in acetic acid (40 ml). The mixture was stirred at RT for 2 hours. The zinc dust was removed by filtration and acetic acid was removed under reduced pressure. Water (100 ml) was added and the pH was adjusted to pH = 13 with 1N NaOH. The water layer was extracted with EtOAc (3 x 100 ml). The combined organic layers were dried over MgS04, filtered and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, yielding a yellow oil (70% yield). Boc20 (7.1 g, 31.8 mmol) was added to a solution of the amine (6.6 g, 26.5 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (50 ml). The reaction mixture was stirred at RT for 2 hours. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the product was purified by flash chromatography (cyclohexane/EtOAc: 95/5), yielding a yellow powder (75% yield). The bromide (350 mg, 1 mmol) was dissolved in THF (13 ml) /water (2 ml). Potassium acetate (100 mg, 1 mmol), 1,3-bis-diphenylphosphinopropane (9.0 mg, 0.02 mmol) and palladium- (11)-acetate (9.0 mg, 0.04 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred at 50 atm CO pressure and 150C for 3 hours. The reaction mixture was filtered, the filtrate dried over MgS04 and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to give a yellow- greenish oil (300 mg). The 4- (l-tert-butoxycarbonylamino-ethyl)-naphthalene-l- carboxylic acid was purified by flash chromatography (DCM/MeOH : 90/10), yielding a white powder (14% yield). The title product was prepared according to the procedure of Compound 31, starting from 4- (1-tert-butoxycarbonylamino-ethyl)-naphthalene-1-carboxylic acid (44 mg) and 4-amino-pyridine (67% yield).'H NMR (300 MHz, , DMSO-d6): 1.64 ppm (d, 3H, J = 6.6 Hz); 5.3 ppm (q, 1H, J = 6.5 Hz), 7.71 ppm (m, 1H), 8.00 ppm (d, 1H, J = 7.7 Hz), 8.32 ppm (m, 1H), 8. 35 ppm (d, 1H, J = 7.3 Hz), 8.81 ppm (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz), 12.2 ppm (s, 1H).
91% aluminum (III) chloride; In 1,2-dichloro-ethane; at 0 - 20℃; for 24h; Section IExample I-IPreparation of Compound 301 and 302General Procedure I-AA solution of 1-Bromo-naphthalene (I-Ia; 2 g, 9.6 mmol) and acetyl chloride (0.84 mL, 11.6 mmol) in 1,2-dichloroethane (30 mL) was cooled to 0 C. and aluminum chloride (2.88 g, 21.6 mmol) was added portion wise. The mixture was stirred at r.t. for 24 hours. The reaction mixture was poured into ice-water (100 mL). The two layers were separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (150 mL×3). The combined organic layers were dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to give compound I-Ib as an orange oil (2.16 g, yield 91%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) delta 8.6 (m, 1H), 8.3 (m, 1H), 7.8 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.58 (m, 2H), 2.63 (s, 3H). MS (ESI) m/z (M+H)+ 250.
62% With aluminum (III) chloride; In carbon disulfide; at 0 - 20℃; for 120h;Inert atmosphere; To a stirred solution of 1.00 g (4.8 mmol) of 1-bromonaphthalene in 15 mL of carbon disulfide at 0 C in a flame-dried flask under N2 was added 0.42 g (5.3 mmol) of acetyl chloride. This solution was stirred at 0 C for 10 min and 0.84 g (6.3 mmol) of AlCl3 was added. The reaction was stirred at 0 C for 3 days followed by 2 days of stirring at ambient temperature. The reaction mixture was poured over ice and concentrated HCl, extracted with ether, washed with NaHCO3 and brine. After drying (MgSO4) the solution was concentrated in vacuo and purified by chromatography (petroleum ether/ether, 95:5) to give 0.75 g (62%) of 1-acetyl-4-bromonaphthalene as a brown oil: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) delta 2.74 (s, 3H), 7.65-7.69 (m, 2H), 7.74 (d, J = 6 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 6 Hz, 1H), 8.32-8.35 (m, 1H), 8.72-8.75 (m, 1H); 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3) delta 30.1, 126.4, 127.5, 127.8, 128.2, 128.4, 128.7, 128.7, 131.2, 132.3, 135.2, 201.0; GC/MS (EI) m/z (rel intensity) 248 (46), 233 (100), 205 (44). The data agree in all respects with those reported previously.
  • 3
  • [ 90-11-9 ]
  • [ 108-24-7 ]
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • 5
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • [ 58149-70-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
68% With sodium tetrahydroborate; In methanol; at 60℃; for 1.5h; A solution of 1 -(4-bromonaphthalen- 1 -yl)ethanone (260 mg, 1.044 mmol) in methanol (5 ml) was treated with sodium borohydride (158 mg, 4.17 mmol). The mixture was allowed to heat at 60 Cfor 1.5 hr. The reaction was diluted with water and partitioned between ethyl acetate and water. Theorganic layer was collected, dried, filted and concentrated. Purification by 5i02 chromatography (0-30% EtOAC-hexanes) provided 1-(4-bromonaphthalen-1-yl)ethanol as a white solid (180 mg, 68%yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, Chloroform-d) 8.31 (dd, J = 7.3, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 8.16 - 8.08 (m, 1H),7.84 - 7.74 (m, 1H), 7.66 - 7.50 (m, 3H), 5.71 - 5.61 (m, 1H), 1.70 - 1.63 (m, 4H).
  • 6
  • [ 141-78-6 ]
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • [ 131513-65-0 ]
  • 12
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • diluted aqueous nitric acid [ No CAS ]
  • [ 16650-55-8 ]
  • 14
  • [ 75-15-0 ]
  • [ 7446-70-0 ]
  • [ 90-11-9 ]
  • [ 75-36-5 ]
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • 15
  • [ 74262-49-0 ]
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • 1-[4-(2-cyano-2-piperidinoethenyl)naphthalenyl]ethanone [ No CAS ]
  • 16
  • [ 383-63-1 ]
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • [ 695176-26-2 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
58% Example 6; Step 1; Synthesis of 4-bromo-1-naphthoyltrifluoroacetone: Ethyltrifluoroacetate (6.91 g, 49 mmol) was added dropwise to an ether (10 mL) solution containing sodium t-butoxide (6.7 g, 52 mmol), which formed a slurry. The <strong>[46258-62-2]4-bromo-1-acetylnaphthalene</strong> (12.2 g, 49 mmol) was added to the slurry in several large additions and the solution was allowed to stir for 18 hours. The solution was diluted with additional ether (50 mL) and was washed with 1 M hydrochloric acid (2×50 mL). The ethereal solution was dried over magnesium sulfate, filtered and the solvent removed. The 4-bromonapthoyltrifluoroacetone could was separated from the unreacted <strong>[46258-62-2]4-bromo-1-acetylnaphthalene</strong> by forming the copper bis(diketonate) from a methanolic solution of the raw beta-diketone and cupric chloride. The first band collected resulted in a yellow powder (9.8 g, 58% yield) upon solvent removal. 1H-NMR (90 MHz, 25 C., CDCl3): delta 14.15 (s, 1 H), 8.40 (m, 2 H), 7.67 (m, 4 H), 6.47 (s, 1 H). Anal.: (found/calc for C17H14O2) 81.71 (81.58), H 5.65 (5.59).
  • 24
  • [ 100-52-7 ]
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • styryl 4-bromo-1-naphthyl ketone [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
95% With fly-ash:H2SO4;Microwave irradiation; Neat (no solvent); General procedure: An appropriate equi-molar quantities of aryl methyl ketones (2 mmol), substituted benzaldehydes (2 mmol) and Fly-ash:H2SO4 (0.75 g) were taken in Borosil tube and tightly capped. The mixture was subjected to microwave heated for 5-6 min in a microwave oven (Scheme 1) (LG Grill, Intellowave, Microwave Oven, 160-800 W) and then cooled to room temperature. The organic layer was separated with dichloromethane and the solid product was obtained on evaporation. The solid, on recrystallization with benzene-hexane mixture gave glittering pale yellow solid. The insoluble catalyst was recycled by washing the solid reagent remained on the filter by ethyl acetate (8 mL) followed by drying in an oven at 100 C for 1 h and it was made reusable for further reactions.
  • 30
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • 1-vinylnaphthoyltrifluoroacetone [ No CAS ]
  • 31
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • (R)-(+)-1-(4-cyano-1-naphthyl)ethanol [ No CAS ]
  • 32
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • [ 41014-20-4 ]
  • 33
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • [ 79996-99-9 ]
  • 34
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • [ 79996-91-1 ]
  • 35
  • [ 46258-62-2 ]
  • [ 79996-90-0 ]
 

Historical Records

Technical Information

Categories