7446-81-3|Sodium acrylate| Ambeed

Structure of 7446-81-3

*Storage: {[sel_prStorage]}

*Shipping: {[sel_prShipping]}

4.5 *For Research Use Only !

{[proInfo.pro_purity]}

Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]} Purity: {[proInfo.pro_purity]}

Change View

Size	Price	VIP Price	US Stock	Global Stock	In Stock
{[ item.pr_size ]}		Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 5-7 days

{[ item.pr_size ]}

In Stock

- +

Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

Quality Control of [ 7446-81-3 ] Purity: 98% T SDS Specification

COA

Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.

NMR

Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.

CNMR

Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.

HPLC

Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.

LC-MS

Search for reports by entering the product batch number.
Batch number can be found on the product's label following the word 'Batch'.

1-2 Day Shipping
High Quality
Technical Support

Product Citations Show More

Expansion Microscopy Provides Nanoscale Insight into Nucleolar Reorganization and Nuclear Foci Formation during Nucleolar Stress

Alley, Katelyn R ; Wyatt, Katelyn M ; Fries, Adam C ; DeRose, Victoria J ;

DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.5c00104 PubMed ID: 40391829 ACS Chem. Biol.,2025.

Abstract: The nucleolus, a membraneless organelle crucial for ribosome production, has a unique nanoscale structure whose organization is responsive to cell signals and disease progression. Here, we highlight the potential of Expansion Microscopy (ExM) for capturing intricate spatial and functional information about membraneless organelles such as the nucleolus and nuclear foci. We apply dual protein Expansion Microscopy (dual-proExM) in combination with click Expansion Microscopy (click-ExM) to capture images at the highest resolution reported for the nucleolus of ∼45 ± 2 nm. Inhibition of nucleolar processes triggers a nucleolar stress response, causing distinct structural rearrange_x005f_x0002_ments whose molecular basis is an area of active investigation. We investigate time-dependent changes in nucleolar structure and function under nucleolar stress induced by oxaliplatin, actinomycin D, and other platinum-based compounds. Our findings reveal new stages that occur prior to the complete sequestration of RNA Pol I into nucleolar caps, shedding light on the early mechanisms of the nucleolar stress response. RNA transcription is linked to nanoscale protein rearrangements using a combination of click-ExM and pro-ExM, revealing locations of active transcripts during the early stages of nucleolar stress reorganization. With prolonged stress, fibrillarin and NPM1 segregate from the nucleolus into nucleoplasmic foci that are for the first time imaged at nanometer resolution. In addition to revealing new morphological information about the nucleolus, this study demonstrates the potential of ExM for imaging membraneless organelles with nanometer-scale precision.

Purchased from AmBeed: 7446-81-3

Selectively Detachable Hydrogel Adhesion Enabled by Stimulus-Specific Cleavable Cross-Linkers

Yoon, Young Bin ; Cho, In ; Koo, Hye Been ; Jung, Hoeyun ; Chang, Jae-Byum ;

DOI: 10.1021/acsami.4c15507 PubMed ID: 39565883 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces,2024,16(48):66738-66752.

Abstract: The development of detachable hydrogel adhesion presents an advancement in the fields of soft electronics and bioengineering as it offers additional functionalities to these applications. However, conventional methods typically rely on a single detachment trigger, so it is unclear whether unintentional detachment might occur in the specific environments of other detachment systems. This makes it difficult to directly introduce two independent detachment triggers directly. In this article, we present a strategy for selective detachable adhesion based on two types of cleavable cross-linkers, N,N'-bis(acryloyl)cystamine(BAC) and N,N′-(1,2-dihydroxyethylene)bis(acrylamide)(DHEBA), each with an independent cleavage trigger. BAC can be cleaved through the reduction of disulfide bonds using reducing agents, while DHEBA can be hydrolyzed through heating. We constructed stitching polymer networks for topological adhesion using two types of cleavable cross-linkers, allowing the networks to be selectively degraded depending on which cross-linker was used. Our findings show that the use of cleavable cross-linkers achieved selectively detachable adhesion in various hydrogels, with adhesion energy that reached up to 1223 J m−2 in polyacrylamide-alginate (PAAm-alginate) tough hydrogel. This strategy also proved versatile as it led to effective adhesion with various substrates, including aluminum, copper, glass, and polyester film (PET). Furthermore, we took advantage of the high programmability of this approach to construct hydrogel-based YES and AND logic gates, whose output changed depending on the applied input triggers. In addition, we designed a selective-release capsule model capable of dual-solution release, which emphasizes the potential of our strategy in creating programmable and responsive soft materials.

Keywords: hydrogel ; detachable hydrogel adhesion ; cleavable cross-linker ; hydrogel logic gates ; selective-release capsule

Purchased from AmBeed: 7446-81-3

Human hand-inspired all-hydrogel gripper with a high load capacity formed by the split-brushing adhesion of diverse hydrogels

Hye Been Koo ; Eunseok Heo ; In Cho ; Sun Hong Kim ; Jiheong Kang ; Jae-Byum Chang

DOI: 10.1039/D2MH01309F PubMed ID: 36920793 Mater. Horiz.,2023,10(6):2075-2085.

Abstract: Human hands are highly versatile. Even though they are primarily made of materials with high water content, they exhibit a high load capacity. However, existing hydrogel grippers do not possess a high load capacity due to their innate softness and mechanical strength. This work demonstrates a human hand-inspired all-hydrogel gripper that can bear more than 47.6 times its own weight. This gripper is made of two hydrogels: poly(methacrylamide-co-methacrylic acid) (P(MAAm-co-MAAc)) and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM). P(MAAm-co-MAAc) is extremely stiff but becomes soft above its transition temperature. By taking advantage of the difference in the kinetics of the stiff–soft transition of P(MAAm-co-MAAc) hydrogels and the swelling–shrinking transition of PNIPAM hydrogels, this gripper can be switched between its stiff-bent and stiff-stretched states by simply changing the temperature. The assembly of these two hydrogels into a gripper necessitated the development of a new hydrogel adhesion method, as existing topological adhesion methods are not applicable to such stiff hydrogels. A new hydrogel adhesion method, termed split-brushing adhesion, has been demonstrated to satisfy this need. When applied to P(MAAm-co-MAAc) hydrogels, this method achieves an adhesion energy of 1221.6 J m[−2], which is 67.5 times higher than that achieved with other topological adhesion methods.

Purchased from AmBeed: 7446-81-3

In situ silver nanoparticle development for molecular-specific biological imaging via highly accessible microscopies

Dae-Hyeon Song ; Chang Woo Song ; Jinkyoung Chung ; Eun-Hae Jang ; Hyunwoo Kim ; Yongsuk Hur , et al.

DOI: 10.1039/d2na00449f PubMed ID: 36926569 Nanoscale Adv.,2023,5(6):1636-1650.

Abstract: In biological studies and diagnoses, brightfield (BF), fluorescence, and electron microscopy (EM) are used to image biomolecules inside cells. When compared, their relative advantages and disadvantages are obvious. BF microscopy is the most accessible of the three, but its resolution is limited to a few microns. EM provides a nanoscale resolution, but sample preparation is time-consuming. In this study, we present a new imaging technique, which we termed decoration microscopy (DecoM), and quantitative investigations to address the aforementioned issues in EM and BF microscopy. For molecular-specific EM imaging, DecoM labels proteins inside cells using antibodies bearing 1.4 nm gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and grows silver layers on the AuNPs' surfaces. The cells are then dried without buffer exchange and imaged using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Structures labeled with silver-grown AuNPs are clearly visible on SEM, even they are covered with lipid membranes. Using stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy, we show that the drying process causes negligible distortion of structures and that less structural deformation could be achieved through simple buffer exchange to hexamethyldisilazane. Using DecoM, we visualize the nanoscale alterations in microtubules by microtubule-severing proteins that cannot be observed with diffraction-limited fluorescence microscopy. We then combine DecoM with expansion microscopy to enable sub-micron resolution BF microscopy imaging. We first show that silver-grown AuNPs strongly absorb white light, and the structures labeled with them are clearly visible on BF microscopy. We then show that the application of AuNPs and silver development must follow expansion to visualize the labeled proteins clearly with sub-micron resolution.

Purchased from AmBeed: 7446-81-3

Strong, Chemically Stable, and Enzymatically On-Demand Detachable Hydrogel Adhesion Using Protein Crosslink

Lee, Wonseok ; Heo, Eunseok ; Koo, Hye Been ; Cho, In ; Chang, Jae-Byum ;

DOI: 10.1002/marc.202200750 PubMed ID: 36484110 Macromol. Rapid Comm.,2023,44(4):2200750.

Abstract: Achieving strong adhesion between hydrogels and diverse materials is greatly significant for emerging technologies yet remains challenging. Existing methods using non-covalent bonds have limited pH and ion stability, while those using covalent bonds typically lack on-demand detachment capability, limiting their applications. In this study, a general strategy of covalent bond-based and detachable adhesion by incorporating amine-rich proteins in various hydrogels and inducing the interfacial crosslinking of the hydrogels using a protein-crosslinking agent is demonstrated. The protein crosslink offers topol. adhesion and can reach a strong adhesion energy of ≈750 J m-2. The chem. of the adhesion is characterized and that the inclusion of proteins inside the hydrogels does not alter the hydrogels' properties is shown. The adhesion remains intact after treating the adhered hydrogels with various pH solutions and ions, even at an elevated temperature The detachment is triggered by treating proteinase solution at the bonding front, causing the digestion of proteins, thus breaking up the interfacial crosslink network. In addition, that this approach can be used to adhere hydrogels to diverse dry surfaces, including glass, elastomers and plastics, is shown. The stable chem. of protein crosslinks opens the door for various applications in a wide range of chem. environments.

Keywords: covalent adhesion ; detachable adhesion ; hydrogels ; otein crosslinks

Purchased from AmBeed: 7446-81-3

Fabrication of Heterogeneous Chemical Patterns on Stretchable Hydrogels Using Single-Photon Lithography

Haeseong Im ; Eunseok Heo ; Dae-Hyeon Song ; Jeongwon Park ; Hyeonbin Park ; Kibum Kang , et al.

DOI: 10.1039/D2SM00253A PubMed ID: 35635476 Soft Matter,2022,18(23):4402-4413.

Abstract: Curved hydrogel surfaces bearing chemical patterns are highly desirable in various applications, including artificial blood vessels, wearable electronics, and soft robotics. However, previous studies on the fabrication of chemical patterns on hydrogels employed two-photon lithography, which is still not widely accessible to most laboratories. This work demonstrates a new patterning technique for fabricating curved hydrogels with chemical patterns on their surfaces without two-photon microscopy. In this work, we show that exposing hydrogels in fluorophore solutions to single photons via confocal microscopy enables the patterning of fluorophores on hydrogels. By applying this technique to highly stretchable hydrogels, we demonstrate three applications: (1) improving pattern resolution by fabricating patterns on stretched hydrogels and then returning the hydrogels to their initial, unstretched length; (2) modifying the local stretchability of hydrogels at a microscale resolution; and (3) fabricating perfusable microchannels with chemical patterns by winding chemically patterned hydrogels around a template, embedding the hydrogels in a second hydrogel, and then removing the template. The patterning method demonstrated in this work may facilitate a better mimicking of the physicochemical properties of organs in tissue engineering and may be used to make hydrogel robots with specific chemical functionalities.

Purchased from AmBeed: 7446-81-3

Product Details of [ 7446-81-3 ]

CAS No. :	7446-81-3
Formula :	C₃H₃NaO₂
M.W :	94.04
SMILES Code :	C=CC([O-])=O.[Na+]
MDL No. :	MFCD00067207
InChI Key :	NNMHYFLPFNGQFZ-UHFFFAOYSA-M
Pubchem ID :	4068533

Safety of [ 7446-81-3 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:	Danger
Hazard Statements:	H315-H318-H335-H410
Precautionary Statements:	P261-P305+P351+P338-P273
Class:	9
UN#:	3077
Packing Group:	Ⅲ

Computational Chemistry of [ 7446-81-3 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms	6
Num. arom. heavy atoms	0
Fraction Csp3	0.0
Num. rotatable bonds	1
Num. H-bond acceptors	2.0
Num. H-bond donors	0.0
Molar Refractivity	15.89
TPSA ? Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.	40.13 Å²

Lipophilicity

Log P_o/w (iLOGP)? iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.	-5.59
Log P_o/w (XLOGP3)? XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry	0.35
Log P_o/w (WLOGP)? WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.	-1.08
Log P_o/w (MLOGP)? MLOGP: Topological method implemented from Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull. Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull. Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.	-0.08
Log P_o/w (SILICOS-IT)? SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com	-0.23
Consensus Log P_o/w? Consensus Log P_o/w: Average of all five predictions	-1.32

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):? ESOL: Topological method implemented from Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.	-0.58
Solubility	24.9 mg/ml ; 0.264 mol/l
Class? Solubility class: Log S scale Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly	Very soluble
Log S (Ali)? Ali: Topological method implemented from Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.	-0.76
Solubility	16.5 mg/ml ; 0.175 mol/l
Class? Solubility class: Log S scale Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly	Very soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)? SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com	0.44
Solubility	259.0 mg/ml ; 2.75 mol/l
Class? Solubility class: Log S scale Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly	Soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption? Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg	High
BBB permeant? BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg	No
P-gp substrate? P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set) and tested on 415 molecules (test set) 10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77 External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94	Yes
CYP1A2 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set) and tested on 3000 molecules (test set) 10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90 External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91	No
CYP2C19 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set) and tested on 3000 molecules (test set) 10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86 External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87	No
CYP2C9 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set) and tested on 2075 molecules (test set) 10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85 External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81	No
CYP2D6 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set) and tested on 1068 molecules (test set) 10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85 External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87	No
CYP3A4 inhibitor? Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set) and tested on 2579 molecules (test set) 10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85 External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86	No
Log Kp (skin permeation)? Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.	-6.63 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski? Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. MW ≤ 500 MLOGP ≤ 4.15 N or O ≤ 10 NH or OH ≤ 5	0.0
Ghose? Ghose filter: implemented from Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem. 160 ≤ MW ≤ 480 -0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6 40 ≤ MR ≤ 130 20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70	None
Veber? Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem. Rotatable bonds ≤ 10 TPSA ≤ 140	0.0
Egan? Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem. WLOGP ≤ 5.88 TPSA ≤ 131.6	0.0
Muegge? Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem. 200 ≤ MW ≤ 600 -2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5 TPSA ≤ 150 Num. rings ≤ 7 Num. carbon > 4 Num. heteroatoms > 1 Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15 H-bond acc. ≤ 10 H-bond don. ≤ 5	2.0
Bioavailability Score? Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat implemented from Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.	0.55

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS? Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.	0.0 alert
Brenk? Structural Alert: implemented from Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem	1.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness? Leadlikeness: implemented from Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 250 ≤ MW ≤ 350 XLOGP ≤ 3.5 Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7	No; 1 violation:MW<1.0
Synthetic accessibility? Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult) based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties, trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r² = 0.94)	1.27

Application In Synthesis of [ 7446-81-3 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

Downstream synthetic route of [ 7446-81-3 ]

[ 7446-81-3 ] Synthesis Path-Downstream 1~35

1
[ 86241-63-6 ]
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 86024-61-5 ]

References: [1]Patent: US2881171,1955, .

2
[ 994-30-9 ]
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 17889-51-9 ]

References: [1]Journal of general chemistry of the USSR,1960,vol. 30,p. 2763 - 2765.
Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii,1960,vol. 30,p. 2782 - 2784.
[2]Russian Journal of General Chemistry,1996,vol. 66,p. 1257 - 1259.

3
[ 20614-18-0 ]
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 32813-68-6 ]

References: [1]Journal of Organic Chemistry USSR (English Translation),1971,vol. 7,p. 984 - 988.
Zhurnal Organicheskoi Khimii,1971,vol. 7,p. 967 - 971.

4
[ 32813-77-7 ]
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 32813-71-1 ]

References: [1]Journal of Organic Chemistry USSR (English Translation),1971,vol. 7,p. 984 - 988.
Zhurnal Organicheskoi Khimii,1971,vol. 7,p. 967 - 971.

5
[ 39074-38-9 ]
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 50888-19-2 ]

References: [1]Patent: DE2214057,1973, .
Chem.Abstr.,1974,vol. 80.

6
[ 20614-19-1 ]
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 32813-74-4 ]

References: [1]Journal of Organic Chemistry USSR (English Translation),1971,vol. 7,p. 984 - 988.
Zhurnal Organicheskoi Khimii,1971,vol. 7,p. 967 - 971.

7
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 109-89-7 ]
[ 2675-94-7 ]

References: [1]Gazzetta Chimica Italiana,1968,vol. 98,p. 1014 - 1030.

8
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 75-78-5 ]
[ 18292-15-4 ]

References: [1]Journal of general chemistry of the USSR,1960,vol. 30,p. 2763 - 2765.
Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii,1960,vol. 30,p. 2782 - 2784.

9
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 1719-53-5 ]
[ 17873-04-0 ]

References: [1]Journal of general chemistry of the USSR,1960,vol. 30,p. 2763 - 2765.
Zhurnal Obshchei Khimii,1960,vol. 30,p. 2782 - 2784.

10
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 814-68-6 ]
[ 2051-76-5 ]

References: [1]Australian Journal of Chemistry,1978,vol. 31,p. 209 - 213.
[2]Journal of the American Chemical Society,1998,vol. 120,p. 2493 - 2500.

11
[ 617-88-9 ]
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 10525-17-4 ]

References: [1]Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds,1990,vol. 26,p. 390 - 392.
Khimiya Geterotsiklicheskikh Soedinenii,1990,p. 457 - 495.

12
[ 109-86-4 ]
[ 7446-81-3 ]
3-(2-Methoxyethoxy)propionic acid sodium salt [ No CAS ]

References: [1]Tetrahedron,1993,vol. 49,p. 3149 - 3164.

13
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 114044-23-4 ]
[ 114044-45-0 ]

References: [1]Journal of Heterocyclic Chemistry,1987,vol. 24,p. 1381 - 1390.

14
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 120801-46-9 ]
[ 120801-50-5 ]

References: [1]Journal of the Chemical Society. Perkin transactions I,1989,p. 313 - 317.

15
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 344883-86-9 ]
[ 87282-40-4 ]

References: [1]Journal of the American Chemical Society,1983,vol. 105,p. 6712 - 6714.

16
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 137-40-6 ]

References: [1]Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry,1984,vol. 58,p. 1650 - 1652.
Zhurnal Fizicheskoi Khimii,1984,vol. 58,p. 2719 - 2721.

17
[ 95-46-5 ]
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 939-57-1 ]

References: [1]Organic Letters,2004,vol. 6,p. 225 - 228.
[2]Journal of Organic Chemistry,2004,vol. 69,p. 7919 - 7927.

18
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 79-06-1 ]
polymer, M_η 1.080E7, polydispersity 0.814; monomer(s): acrylamide; sodium acrylate, 21.5 wt. percent [ No CAS ]
polymer, M_η 5.08E6, polydispersity 0.814; monomer(s): acrylamide; sodium acrylate, 21.5 wt. percent [ No CAS ]
polymer, M_η 3.30E6, polydispersity 0.814; monomer(s): acrylamide; sodium acrylate, 21.5 wt. percent [ No CAS ]
polymer, M_η 1.07E6, polydispersity 0.814; monomer(s): acrylamide; sodium acrylate, 21.5 wt. percent [ No CAS ]

References: [1]Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry,2003,vol. 76,p. 1850 - 1854.

19
[ 15284-39-6 ]
[ 110-26-9 ]
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 79-10-7 ]
polymer; monomer(s): acrylic acid; sodium acrylate; 2-methyl-5-vinyltetrazole; N,N\-methylenebisacrylamide [ No CAS ]

References: [1]Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry,2004,vol. 77,p. 1704 - 1707.

20
[ 110-26-9 ]
[ 7446-81-3 ]
[ 79-10-7 ]
polymer; monomer(s): acrylic acid; sodium acrylate; N,N\-methylenebisacrylamide [ No CAS ]

References: [1]Russian Journal of Applied Chemistry,2004,vol. 77,p. 1704 - 1707.

21
C₃₂H₁₂IN₈O₉S₃^(5-)*Ga⁽³⁺⁾*HO^(1-)*3Na⁽¹⁺⁾ [ No CAS ]
[ 7446-81-3 ]
C₃₅H₁₄N₈O₁₁S₃^(6-)*Ga⁽³⁺⁾*HO^(1-)*4Na⁽¹⁺⁾ [ No CAS ]

References: [1]Tetrahedron Letters,2006,vol. 47,p. 8275 - 8278.

22
[ 110-26-9 ]
[ 2210-25-5 ]
[ 7446-81-3 ]
polymer; monomer(s): N-isopropylacrylamide; sodium acrylate; N,N'-methylenebis(acrylamide) [ No CAS ]