Home Cart Sign in  
Chemical Structure| 5438-07-3 Chemical Structure| 5438-07-3

Structure of 5438-07-3

Chemical Structure| 5438-07-3

*Storage: {[sel_prStorage]}

*Shipping: {[sel_prShipping]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}

4.5 *For Research Use Only !

{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]} Purity: {[proInfo.pro_purity]}

Change View

Size Price VIP Price

US Stock

Global Stock

In Stock
{[ item.pr_size ]} Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 5-7 days

  • {[ item.pr_size ]}

In Stock

- +

Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

  • 1-2 Day Shipping
  • High Quality
  • Technical Support
Product Citations

Alternative Products

Product Details of [ 5438-07-3 ]

CAS No. :5438-07-3
Formula : C10H13NO2
M.W : 179.22
SMILES Code : CCC(C1=CC=CC=C1)(N)C(O)=O
MDL No. :MFCD00038162
InChI Key :UBXUDSPYIGPGGP-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Pubchem ID :89317

Safety of [ 5438-07-3 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:Warning
Hazard Statements:H315-H319-H335
Precautionary Statements:P261-P305+P351+P338

Computational Chemistry of [ 5438-07-3 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms 13
Num. arom. heavy atoms 6
Fraction Csp3 0.3
Num. rotatable bonds 3
Num. H-bond acceptors 3.0
Num. H-bond donors 2.0
Molar Refractivity 50.19
TPSA ?

Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from
Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.

63.32 Ų

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP)?

iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from
Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

1.44
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)?

XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by
XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry

-0.99
Log Po/w (WLOGP)?

WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from
Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

1.23
Log Po/w (MLOGP)?

MLOGP: Topological method implemented from
Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.

-0.81
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

1.06
Consensus Log Po/w?

Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions

0.39

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):?

ESOL: Topological method implemented from
Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-0.47
Solubility 60.6 mg/ml ; 0.338 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Very soluble
Log S (Ali)?

Ali: Topological method implemented from
Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

0.15
Solubility 251.0 mg/ml ; 1.4 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Highly soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-2.25
Solubility 1.01 mg/ml ; 0.00561 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption?

Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg

High
BBB permeant?

BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg

Yes
P-gp substrate?

P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set)
and tested on 415 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77
External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94

No
CYP1A2 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90
External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91

No
CYP2C19 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86
External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP2C9 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2075 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81

No
CYP2D6 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set)
and tested on 1068 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP3A4 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2579 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86

No
Log Kp (skin permeation)?

Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from
Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.

-8.1 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski?

Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from
Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
MW ≤ 500
MLOGP ≤ 4.15
N or O ≤ 10
NH or OH ≤ 5

0.0
Ghose?

Ghose filter: implemented from
Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem.
160 ≤ MW ≤ 480
-0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6
40 ≤ MR ≤ 130
20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70

None
Veber?

Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from
Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.
Rotatable bonds ≤ 10
TPSA ≤ 140

0.0
Egan?

Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from
Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.
WLOGP ≤ 5.88
TPSA ≤ 131.6

0.0
Muegge?

Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from
Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem.
200 ≤ MW ≤ 600
-2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5
TPSA ≤ 150
Num. rings ≤ 7
Num. carbon > 4
Num. heteroatoms > 1
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15
H-bond acc. ≤ 10
H-bond don. ≤ 5

1.0
Bioavailability Score?

Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat
implemented from
Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.

0.55

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS?

Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from
Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.

0.0 alert
Brenk?

Structural Alert: implemented from
Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem

0.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness?

Leadlikeness: implemented from
Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
250 ≤ MW ≤ 350
XLOGP ≤ 3.5
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7

No; 1 violation:MW<1.0
Synthetic accessibility?

Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult)
based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties,
trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r2 = 0.94)

1.67

Application In Synthesis of [ 5438-07-3 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 5438-07-3 ]

[ 5438-07-3 ] Synthesis Path-Downstream   1~35

  • 1
  • [ 85-44-9 ]
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 102181-58-8 ]
  • 2
  • [ 50-00-0 ]
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 85614-51-3 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
With hydrogenchloride; hydrogen;palladium 10% on activated carbon; In methanol; water; under 2585.81 Torr; for 42h; A mixture of <strong>[5438-07-3]2-amino-2-phenylbutyric acid</strong> (1 ,5 g, 8.4 mmol), formaldehyde (14 mL, 37% in water), IN HCl (10 mL) and 10% Pd/C (0.5 mg) in MeOH (40 mL) was exposed to H2 at 50 psi in a Parr bottle for 42 h. The reaction was filtered over CELITE a^ concentrated in vacuo, the residue was taken up in MeOH (36 mL) and the product was purified with a reverse phase HPLC (MeOH/H2O/TFA) to afford the TFA salt of Cap-164 as a white solid (1.7 g). 1H NMR (DMS0-d6, delta = 2.5 ppm, 500MHz) 7.54-7.47 (m, 5H), 2.63 (m, IH), 2.55 (s, 6H), 2.31 (m, IH), 0.95 (app t, J = 7.3 Hz5 3H).
With hydrogenchloride; hydrogen;palladium 10% on activated carbon; In methanol; water; under 2585.81 Torr; for 42h; A mixture of <strong>[5438-07-3]2-amino-2-phenylbutyric acid</strong> (1.5 g, 8.4 mmol), formaldehyde (14 mL, 37% in water), IN HC1 (10 mL) and 10% Pd/C (0.5 mg) in MeOH (40 mL) was exposed to ¾ at 50 psi in a Parr bottle for 42 h. The reaction was filtered over Celite and concentrated in vacuo, the residue was taken up in MeOH (36 mL) and the product was purified with a reverse phase HPLC (MeOH/H20/TFA) to afford theTFA salt of Cap-164 as a white solid (1.7 g). ¾ NMR (DMSO-d6, delta = 2.5 ppm, 500 MHz) 7.54-7.47 (m, 5H), 2.63 (m, 1H), 2.55 (s, 6H), 2.31 (m, 1H), 0.95 (app t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H).
  • 3
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • 2-ethoxycarbonylamino-2-phenyl-butyric acid ethyl ester [ No CAS ]
  • 5
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • 2-phenyl-2-(<i>N</i>'-phenyl-ureido)-butyric acid [ No CAS ]
  • 6
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 98-88-4 ]
  • [ 101877-92-3 ]
  • 7
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 17356-08-0 ]
  • 5-ethyl-5-phenyl-2-thioxo-imidazolidin-4-one [ No CAS ]
  • 8
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 57-13-6 ]
  • [ 2216-93-5 ]
  • 9
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 103-85-5 ]
  • [ 33830-07-8 ]
  • 10
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 501-53-1 ]
  • N-Benzyloxycarbonyl-C-ethyl-C-phenyl-glycin [ No CAS ]
  • 11
  • [ 27856-08-2 ]
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • 12
  • [ 76142-47-7 ]
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • 13
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 407-25-0 ]
  • 2-Phenyl-2-(2,2,2-trifluoro-acetylamino)-butyric acid [ No CAS ]
  • 15
  • (+-)-4-ethyl-4-phenyl-imidazolidinedione-(2.5) [ No CAS ]
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • 16
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 7732-18-5 ]
  • [ 127-17-3 ]
  • [ 15719-64-9 ]
  • [ 93-55-0 ]
  • 17
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 7732-18-5 ]
  • silver oxide [ No CAS ]
  • [ 7664-41-7 ]
  • [ 15719-64-9 ]
  • [ 93-55-0 ]
  • 18
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • TFA-DL-Phg(αEt)-Azt-OH [ No CAS ]
  • 19
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • C30H35F3N6O6 [ No CAS ]
  • 20
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 169390-28-7 ]
  • 21
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • TFA-D-Phg(αEt)-Azt-Arg-H [ No CAS ]
  • 22
  • [ 171181-53-6 ]
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • 23
  • [ 1028309-24-1 ]
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • 24
  • triphenylbismuth carbonate [ No CAS ]
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • 25
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 65567-34-2 ]
  • 26
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 65567-32-0 ]
  • 27
  • [ 93-55-0 ]
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • 28
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 103853-64-1 ]
  • 31
  • [ 50-00-0 ]
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 76-05-1 ]
  • [ 1246852-56-1 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
A mixture of <strong>[5438-07-3]2-amino-2-phenylbutyric acid</strong> (1.5 g, 8.4 mmol), formaldehyde (14 mL, 37% in water), 1N HCl (10 mL) and 10% Pd/C (0.5 mg) in MeOH (40 mL) was exposed to H2 at 50 psi in a Parr bottle for 42 h. The reaction was filtered over Celite and concentrated in vacuo, the residue was taken up in MeOH (36 mL) and the product was purified with a reverse phase HPLC (MeOH/H2O/TFA) to afford the TFA salt of Cap-164 as a white solid (1.7 g). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, delta=2.5 ppm, 500 MHz) 7.54-7.47 (m, 5H), 2.63 (m, 1H), 2.55 (s, 6H), 2.31 (m, 1H), 0.95 (app t, J=7.3 Hz, 3H).
A mixture of <strong>[5438-07-3]2-amino-2-phenylbutyric acid</strong> (1.5 g, 8.4 ramol) , formaldehyde (14 mL, 37% in water) , IN HCl (10 mL) and 10% Pd/C (0.5 mg) in MeOH (40 mL) was exposed to H2 at 50 psi in a Parr bottle for 42 h. The reaction was filtered over CeI ite and concentrated in vacuo, the residue was taken up in MeOH (36 mL) and the product was purified with a reverse phase HPLC (MeOH/H2O/TFA) to afford the TFA salt of Cap-164 as a white solid (1.7 g) . 1H NMR (DMSO-ds, delta = 2.5 ppm, 500 MHz) 7.54-7.47 (m, 5H), 2.63 (m, IH), 2.55 (s, 6H), 2.31 (m, IH) , 0.95 (app t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H) .
A mixture of <strong>[5438-07-3]2-amino-2-phenylbutyric acid</strong> (1.5 g, 8.4 mmol), formaldehyde (14 mL, 37% in water), IN HCl (10 mL) and 10% Pd/C (0.5 mg) in MeOH (40 mL) was exposed to H2 at 50 psi in a Parr bottle for 42 h. The reaction was filtered over CELITE and concentrated in vacuo, the residue was taken up in MeOH (36 mL) and the product was purified with a reverse phase HPLC (MeOH/H20/TFA) to afford the TFA salt of Cap- 164 as a white solid (1.7 g). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, delta = 2.5 ppm, 500 MHz) 7.54-7.47 (m, 5H), 2.63 (m, 1H), 2.55 (s, 6H), 2.31 (m, 1H), 0.95 (app t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H).
[00262] A mixture of <strong>[5438-07-3]2-amino-2-phenylbutyric acid</strong> (1.5 g, 8.4 mmol), formaldehyde (14 mL, 37% in water), IN HCl (10 mL) and 10% Pd/C (0.5 mg) in MeOH (40 mL) was exposed to ¾ at 50 psi in a Parr bottle for 42 h. The reaction was filtered over CELITE and concentrated in vacuo, the residue was taken up in MeOH (36 mL) and the product was purified with a reverse phase HPLC (MeOH/H20/TFA) to afford the TFA salt of Cap- 164 as a white solid (1.7 g). XH NMR (DMSO-d6, delta = 2.5 ppm, 500 MHz) 7.54-7.47 (m, 5H), 2.63 (m, 1H), 2.55 (s, 6H), 2.31 (m, 1H), 0.95 (app t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H).
A mixture of <strong>[5438-07-3]2-amino-2-phenylbutyric acid</strong> (1.5 g, 8.4 mmol), formaldehyde (14 mL, 37% in water), 1N HCl (10 mL) and 10% Pd/C (0.5 mg) in MeOH (40 mL) was exposed to H2 at 50 psi in a Parr bottle for 42 h. The reaction was filtered over Celite and concentrated in vacuo, the residue was taken up in MeOH (36 mL) and the product was purified with a reverse phase HPLC (MeOH/H2O/TFA) to afford the TFA salt of Cap-164 as a white solid (1.7 g). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, delta=2.5 ppm, 500 MHz) 7.54-7.47 (m, 5H), 2.63 (m, 1H), 2.55 (s, 6H), 2.31 (m, 1H), 0.95 (app t, J=7.3 Hz, 3H).

  • 32
  • [ 50-00-0 ]
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 1246852-56-1 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
A mixture of <strong>[5438-07-3]2-amino-2-phenylbutyric acid</strong> (1.5 g, 8.4 mmol), formaldehyde(14 mL, 37% in water), IN HCl (10 mL) and 10% Pd/C (0.5 mg) in MeOH (40 mL) was exposed to H2 at 50 psi in a Parr bottle for 42 h. The reaction was filtered over CELITE and concentrated in vacuo, the residue was taken up in MeOH (36 mL) and the product was purified with a reverse phase HPLC (MeOH/^O/TFA) to afford the TFA salt of Cap-164 as a white solid (1.7 g). 3H NMR (DMSO-d6, delta - 2.5 ppm, 500MHz) 7.54-7.47 (m, 5H), 2.63 (m, IH), 2.55 (s, 6H), 2.31 (m, IH)5 0.95 (app t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H).
  • 33
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 33875-38-6 ]
  • [ 52247-77-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
With chiral stationary phase including isopropyl-functionalized CF6; In methanol; acetic acid; triethylamine; acetonitrile; at 20℃;Purification / work up; In addition to the foregoing, numerous other chromatographic separations using a column bonded with a CSP including a derivatized cyclofructan residue were carried out. Tables 5-9 list some additional examples of chromatographic separations using a column bonded with a CSP of the present invention. AU examples of chromatographic separations using columns bonded with CSPs of the present invention were carried out using the following experimental conditions and procedures.|0132| The high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column packing system was composed of an air driven fluid pump (HASKEL, DSTV- 122), an air compressor, a pressure regulator, a low pressure gauge, two high-pressure gauges (10,000 and 6,000 psi), a slurry chamber, check valves, and tubings. The CSPs were slurry packed into a 25 cm x 0.46 cm (inner diameter, I. D.) stainless steel column.|0133| The HPLC system was an Agilent 1 100 system (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto,CA), which consisted of a diode array detector, an autosampler, a binary pump, a temperature- controlled column chamber, and Chemstation software. All chiral analytes were dissolved in ethanol, methanol, or other appropriate mobile phases, as indicated. For the LC analysis, the injection volume and flow rate were 5 muL and 1 mL/min, respectively. Separations were carried out at room temperature (~20 0C) if not specified otherwise. The wavelengths of UV detection were 195, 200, 210, and 254 nm. The mobile phase was degassed by ultrasonication under vacuum for 5 min. Each sample was analyzed in duplicate. Three operation modes (the normal phase mode, polar organic mode, and reversed phase mode) were tested, unless indicated otherwise. In the normal phase mode, heptane with ethanol or isopropanol was used as the mobile phase. In some cases, trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was used as an additive, as indicated. The mobile phase of the polar organic mode was composed of acetonitrile/methanol and small amounts of acetic acid and triethylamine. Water/acetonitrile or acetonitrile/acetate buffer (20 mM, pH = 4.1 ) was used as the mobile phase in the reversed-phase mode.|0134| Two different supercritical fluid chromatographic instruments were used. One was a Berger SFC unit with an FCM 1200 flow control module, a TCM 2100 thermal column module, a dual pump control module, and a column selection valve. The flow rate was 4 mL/min. The cosolvent was composed of methanol/ethanol/isopropanol = 1 : 1 : 1 and 0.2% diethylamine (DEA). The gradient mobile phase composition was 5% cosolvent hold during 0- 0.6 min, 5-60% during 0.6-4.3 min, 60% hold during 4.3-6.3 min, 60%-5% during 6.3-6.9 min, and 5% hold during 6.9-8.0 min. The other SFC system was a Jasco (MD, USA) system comprised of an autosampler unit (AS-2059-SF Plus), a dual pump module (PU-2086 Plus), a column thermostat module (CO-2060 Plus), a UV/Vis detector (UV-2075 Plus), and a back pressure regulator module (SCH-Vch-BP). Unless otherwise specified, the mobile phase was composed of CCVmethanol (0.1 % TFA or 0.1% diethylamine). The flow rate was 3 mL/min.|0135| For the calculations of chromatographic data, the "dead time" to was determined by the peak of the refractive index change due to the sample solvent or determined by injecting l ,3,5-tri-/e/-/-butylbenzene in the normal phase mode.
  • 34
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 1260435-40-2 ]
  • 35
  • [ 5438-07-3 ]
  • [ 1260435-50-4 ]
 

Historical Records

Technical Information

Categories