Home Cart Sign in  
HazMat Fee +

There will be a HazMat fee per item when shipping a dangerous goods. The HazMat fee will be charged to your UPS/DHL/FedEx collect account or added to the invoice unless the package is shipped via Ground service. Ship by air in Excepted Quantity (each bottle), which is up to 1g/1mL for class 6.1 packing group I or II, and up to 25g/25ml for all other HazMat items.

Type HazMat fee for 500 gram (Estimated)
Excepted Quantity USD 0.00
Limited Quantity USD 15-60
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), Domestic USD 80+
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), International USD 150+
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), Domestic USD 100+
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), International USD 200+
Chemical Structure| 54010-75-2 Chemical Structure| 54010-75-2

Structure of Zinc trifluoromethanesulfonate
CAS No.: 54010-75-2

Chemical Structure| 54010-75-2

*Storage: {[sel_prStorage]}

*Shipping: {[sel_prShipping]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}

4.5 *For Research Use Only !

{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]} Purity: {[proInfo.pro_purity]}

Change View

Size Price VIP Price

US Stock

Global Stock

In Stock
{[ item.pr_size ]} Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 5-7 days

  • {[ item.pr_size ]}

In Stock

- +

Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

  • 1-2 Day Shipping
  • High Quality
  • Technical Support
Product Citations

Product Citations      Show More

Betts, Katherine ; Jiang, Yuhan ; Frailey, Michael ; Yohannes, Kidus ; Feng, Zhange ;

Abstract: With the heightening interest in bivalent battery technology, there arises a necessity for a thorough investigation into zinc-ion battery (ZIB) electrolytes, accommodating their chemical attributes and potential-dependent structural dynamics. While the phenomenon of in situ solid electrolyte interphase formation is extensively documented in lithium-ion batteries, its analogous occurrences in ZIBs remain limited. Herein is a comparative study of three zinc electrolytes of interest: ZnSO4, ZnOTF, and Zn(TFSI)2/LiTFSI hybrid water-in-salt electrolyte. Additionally, the impact of an acetonitrile additive is scrutinized, with a comparative assessment of the interfacial behavior in aqueous solutions. Utilizing ATR-SEIRAS, potential-dependent alterations in the composition of the electrolyte/electrode interface were monitored, while EQCM-D facilitated a comprehensive understanding of variations in the mass and structural properties of the adsorbed layer. Aqueous ZnSO4 demonstrated the accumulation of porous Zn4SO4(OH)6·xH2O at negative potentials, leading to a mass of 1.47 μg cm−2 after five cycles. Bisulfate formation was observed at positive potentials. SEIRAS measurements for ZnOTF demonstrated reorientation and surface adsorption of CF3SO3 to favor CF3 at the surface for positive potentials, and acetonitrile showed increased stability for the electrode at negative potentials. The additive was also reported to lead to the accumulation of a substantial passivation layer with viscoelastic properties. The zinc water-in-salt showed exceptional surface stability at negative potentials and a widened potential window. A thin rigid zinc SEI layer is reported with a mass of 0.7 μg cm−2 . The compositional intricacies of these surface structures are discussed in relation to their solvent conditions. This investigation not only sheds light on the initial charge/discharge cycles in ZIBs but also underscores their pivotal role in instigating enduring transformations that can significantly influence their long-term cycling performance.

Purchased from AmBeed:

Singh, Surya Pratap ; Chaudhary, Umesh ; Sharma, Indrajeet ;

Abstract: Traditional glycosylation methods using thioglycosides often require harsh conditions or expensive metal catalysts. This study presents a more sustainable alternative by employing copper, an earth-abundant catalyst. We developed diazo-based thioglycoside donors that, through copper catalysis, undergo intramolecular activation to form glycosyl sulfonium ions, leading to the generation of oxocarbenium ions. This versatile approach efficiently accommodates a variety of O-nucleophiles, including primary, secondary, and tertiary, as well as complex bioactive molecules. It is compatible with various glycosyl donors and protecting groups, including superarmed, armed, and disarmed systems. Notably, the methodology operates orthogonally to traditional thioglycoside and alkyne donors and has been successfully applied to the orthogonal iterative synthesis of trisaccharides. Mechanistic insights were gained by studying the electronic effects of electron-donating (OMe) and electron-withdrawing (NO2) groups on the donors, offering a valuable understanding of the intramolecular reaction pathway.

Keywords: earth-abundant metals ; copper catalysis ; thioglycoside donor ; orthogonal reactivity ; iterative synthesis ; intramolecular activation

Purchased from AmBeed: ; ;

Alternative Products

Product Details of [ 54010-75-2 ]

CAS No. :54010-75-2
Formula : C2F6O6S2Zn
M.W : 363.55
SMILES Code : O=S(C(F)(F)F)([O-])=O.O=S(C(F)(F)F)([O-])=O.[Zn+2]
MDL No. :MFCD00013229
InChI Key :CITILBVTAYEWKR-UHFFFAOYSA-L
Pubchem ID :104671

Safety of [ 54010-75-2 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:Danger
Hazard Statements:H314
Precautionary Statements:P280-P305+P351+P338-P310
Class:8
UN#:3261
Packing Group:

Computational Chemistry of [ 54010-75-2 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms 17
Num. arom. heavy atoms 0
Fraction Csp3 1.0
Num. rotatable bonds 2
Num. H-bond acceptors 12.0
Num. H-bond donors 0.0
Molar Refractivity 31.59
TPSA ?

Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from
Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.

131.16 Ų

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP)?

iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from
Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-46.97
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)?

XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by
XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry

0.64
Log Po/w (WLOGP)?

WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from
Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

4.78
Log Po/w (MLOGP)?

MLOGP: Topological method implemented from
Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.

-0.34
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

2.23
Consensus Log Po/w?

Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions

-7.93

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):?

ESOL: Topological method implemented from
Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-2.37
Solubility 1.57 mg/ml ; 0.00432 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble
Log S (Ali)?

Ali: Topological method implemented from
Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-2.97
Solubility 0.39 mg/ml ; 0.00107 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-0.1
Solubility 290.0 mg/ml ; 0.798 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption?

Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg

Low
BBB permeant?

BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg

No
P-gp substrate?

P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set)
and tested on 415 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77
External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94

Yes
CYP1A2 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90
External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91

No
CYP2C19 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86
External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP2C9 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2075 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81

No
CYP2D6 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set)
and tested on 1068 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP3A4 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2579 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86

No
Log Kp (skin permeation)?

Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from
Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.

-8.06 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski?

Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from
Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
MW ≤ 500
MLOGP ≤ 4.15
N or O ≤ 10
NH or OH ≤ 5

0.0
Ghose?

Ghose filter: implemented from
Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem.
160 ≤ MW ≤ 480
-0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6
40 ≤ MR ≤ 130
20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70

None
Veber?

Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from
Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.
Rotatable bonds ≤ 10
TPSA ≤ 140

0.0
Egan?

Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from
Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.
WLOGP ≤ 5.88
TPSA ≤ 131.6

0.0
Muegge?

Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from
Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem.
200 ≤ MW ≤ 600
-2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5
TPSA ≤ 150
Num. rings ≤ 7
Num. carbon > 4
Num. heteroatoms > 1
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15
H-bond acc. ≤ 10
H-bond don. ≤ 5

2.0
Bioavailability Score?

Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat
implemented from
Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.

0.55

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS?

Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from
Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.

0.0 alert
Brenk?

Structural Alert: implemented from
Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem

3.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness?

Leadlikeness: implemented from
Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
250 ≤ MW ≤ 350
XLOGP ≤ 3.5
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7

No; 1 violation:MW<1.0
Synthetic accessibility?

Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult)
based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties,
trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r2 = 0.94)

2.34

Application In Synthesis of [ 54010-75-2 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 54010-75-2 ]

[ 54010-75-2 ] Synthesis Path-Downstream   1~25

  • 1
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 1517-69-7 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C29H31N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 2
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52019-78-0 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C27H35N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 3
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 37982-27-7 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C33H37N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 4
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 1517-66-4 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C26H33N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 5
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 31087-44-2 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C26H33N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 6
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 16404-54-9 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C27H35N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 7
  • [ 54221-96-4 ]
  • [ 1517-69-7 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C29H31N5O2Zn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 8
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 14898-79-4 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C25H31N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 9
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 4221-99-2 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C25H31N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 10
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • [ 78-92-2 ]
  • C25H31N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 11
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 1445-91-6 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C29H31N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 12
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 98-85-1 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C29H31N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 13
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 239080-06-9 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C33H37N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 14
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 1565-74-8 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C30H33N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 15
  • rel-(R)-1-phenylbutanol [ No CAS ]
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C31H35N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 16
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 2344-70-9 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C31H35N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 17
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 6169-06-8 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 75-05-8 ]
  • C29H39N5OZn(2+) [ No CAS ]
  • 18
  • 3-(o-tolyl)picolinaldehyde [ No CAS ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 169556-48-3 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • C35H43N5O3Zn(2+) [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
With 4-(2-chloroethyl)morpholine hydrochride; In acetonitrile; at 20℃; for 16h;Sonication; Molecular sieve; Darkness; General procedure: An aldehyde (30 mmol), Zn(OTf)2 (13 mg, 35 mmol), and (N-Chloroethyl)morpholine HCl 6.5 mg, 35 mmol) were added to a 1dram vial. The dry solvent, acetonitrile (1mL), was added to the vial. Afterwards dipicolylamine (7 muL 35 mmol) was added to the vial and the vial was sonicated. Once the solution was transparent molecular sieves were added to the solution along with the respective alcohol (175 mmol). The assemblies were incubated for 16 h at room temperature in the dark.
  • 19
  • [ 2979-22-8 ]
  • 3-(o-tolyl)picolinaldehyde [ No CAS ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • C34H34N4O2Zn(2+) [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
With 4-(2-chloroethyl)morpholine hydrochride; In acetonitrile; at 20℃; for 16h;Sonication; Molecular sieve; Darkness; General procedure: An aldehyde (30 mmol), Zn(OTf)2 (13 mg, 35 mmol), and (N-Chloroethyl)morpholine HCl 6.5 mg, 35 mmol) were added to a 1dram vial. The dry solvent, acetonitrile (1mL), was added to the vial. Afterwards dipicolylamine (7 muL 35 mmol) was added to the vial and the vial was sonicated. Once the solution was transparent molecular sieves were added to the solution along with the respective alcohol (175 mmol). The assemblies were incubated for 16 h at room temperature in the dark.
  • 20
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 169556-48-3 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 206181-89-7 ]
  • C34H41N5O3Zn(2+) [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
With 4-(2-chloroethyl)morpholine hydrochride; In acetonitrile; at 20℃; for 16h;Sonication; Molecular sieve; Darkness; General procedure: An aldehyde (30 mmol), Zn(OTf)2 (13 mg, 35 mmol), and (N-Chloroethyl)morpholine HCl 6.5 mg, 35 mmol) were added to a 1dram vial. The dry solvent, acetonitrile (1mL), was added to the vial. Afterwards dipicolylamine (7 muL 35 mmol) was added to the vial and the vial was sonicated. Once the solution was transparent molecular sieves were added to the solution along with the respective alcohol (175 mmol). The assemblies were incubated for 16 h at room temperature in the dark.
  • 21
  • [ 2979-22-8 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • [ 206181-89-7 ]
  • C33H32N4O2Zn(2+) [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
With 4-(2-chloroethyl)morpholine hydrochride; In acetonitrile; at 20℃; for 16h;Sonication; Molecular sieve; Darkness; General procedure: An aldehyde (30 mmol), Zn(OTf)2 (13 mg, 35 mmol), and (N-Chloroethyl)morpholine HCl 6.5 mg, 35 mmol) were added to a 1dram vial. The dry solvent, acetonitrile (1mL), was added to the vial. Afterwards dipicolylamine (7 muL 35 mmol) was added to the vial and the vial was sonicated. Once the solution was transparent molecular sieves were added to the solution along with the respective alcohol (175 mmol). The assemblies were incubated for 16 h at room temperature in the dark.
  • 22
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 169556-48-3 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • C29H39N5O3Zn(2+) [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
With 4-(2-chloroethyl)morpholine hydrochride; In acetonitrile; at 20℃; for 16h;Sonication; Molecular sieve; Darkness; General procedure: An aldehyde (30 mmol), Zn(OTf)2 (13 mg, 35 mmol), and (N-Chloroethyl)morpholine HCl 6.5 mg, 35 mmol) were added to a 1dram vial. The dry solvent, acetonitrile (1mL), was added to the vial. Afterwards dipicolylamine (7 muL 35 mmol) was added to the vial and the vial was sonicated. Once the solution was transparent molecular sieves were added to the solution along with the respective alcohol (175 mmol). The assemblies were incubated for 16 h at room temperature in the dark.
  • 23
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 2979-22-8 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 1539-42-0 ]
  • C28H30N4O2Zn(2+) [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
With 4-(2-chloroethyl)morpholine hydrochride; In acetonitrile; at 20℃; for 16h;Sonication; Molecular sieve; Darkness; General procedure: An aldehyde (30 mmol), Zn(OTf)2 (13 mg, 35 mmol), and (N-Chloroethyl)morpholine HCl 6.5 mg, 35 mmol) were added to a 1dram vial. The dry solvent, acetonitrile (1mL), was added to the vial. Afterwards dipicolylamine (7 muL 35 mmol) was added to the vial and the vial was sonicated. Once the solution was transparent molecular sieves were added to the solution along with the respective alcohol (175 mmol). The assemblies were incubated for 16 h at room temperature in the dark.
  • 24
  • [ 103854-64-4 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 104-94-9 ]
  • C36H32N4O4Zn(2+)*2CF3O3S(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 25
  • [ 103854-64-4 ]
  • [ 54010-75-2 ]
  • [ 62-53-3 ]
  • C34H28N4O2Zn(2+)*2CF3O3S(1-) [ No CAS ]
 

Historical Records

Categories