Home Cart Sign in  
Chemical Structure| 52462-29-0 Chemical Structure| 52462-29-0

Structure of 52462-29-0

Chemical Structure| 52462-29-0

*Storage: {[sel_prStorage]}

*Shipping: {[sel_prShipping]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}

4.5 *For Research Use Only !

{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]} Purity: {[proInfo.pro_purity]}

Change View

Size Price VIP Price

US Stock

Global Stock

In Stock
{[ item.pr_size ]} Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 5-7 days

  • {[ item.pr_size ]}

In Stock

- +

Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

  • 1-2 Day Shipping
  • High Quality
  • Technical Support
Product Citations

Alternative Products

Product Details of [ 52462-29-0 ]

CAS No. :52462-29-0
Formula : C20H28Cl4Ru2
M.W : 612.39
SMILES Code : [Cl-][Ru+2]1([Cl-][Ru+2]23456(C7C2(=C3C4=C5(C6=7)C(C)C)C)([Cl-]1)[Cl-])12345C6C1(=C2C3=C4(C5=6)C(C)C)C
MDL No. :MFCD00064793
InChI Key :LAXRNWSASWOFOT-UHFFFAOYSA-J
Pubchem ID :10908223

Safety of [ 52462-29-0 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:Warning
Hazard Statements:H315-H319-H412
Precautionary Statements:P273-P305+P351+P338

Computational Chemistry of [ 52462-29-0 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms 26
Num. arom. heavy atoms 0
Fraction Csp3 0.4
Num. rotatable bonds 2
Num. H-bond acceptors 0.0
Num. H-bond donors 0.0
Molar Refractivity 104.97
TPSA ?

Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from
Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.

0.0 Ų

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP)?

iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from
Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

0.0
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)?

XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by
XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry

5.25
Log Po/w (WLOGP)?

WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from
Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-6.8
Log Po/w (MLOGP)?

MLOGP: Topological method implemented from
Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.

6.33
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

6.34
Consensus Log Po/w?

Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions

2.23

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):?

ESOL: Topological method implemented from
Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-6.76
Solubility 0.000104 mg/ml ; 0.000000173 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Poorly soluble
Log S (Ali)?

Ali: Topological method implemented from
Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-5.0
Solubility 0.00606 mg/ml ; 0.00001 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Moderately soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-8.3
Solubility 0.00000301 mg/ml ; 0.000000005 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Poorly soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption?

Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg

Low
BBB permeant?

BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg

No
P-gp substrate?

P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set)
and tested on 415 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77
External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94

Yes
CYP1A2 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90
External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91

No
CYP2C19 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86
External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP2C9 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2075 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81

No
CYP2D6 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set)
and tested on 1068 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP3A4 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2579 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86

Yes
Log Kp (skin permeation)?

Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from
Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.

-6.26 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski?

Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from
Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
MW ≤ 500
MLOGP ≤ 4.15
N or O ≤ 10
NH or OH ≤ 5

2.0
Ghose?

Ghose filter: implemented from
Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem.
160 ≤ MW ≤ 480
-0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6
40 ≤ MR ≤ 130
20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70

None
Veber?

Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from
Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.
Rotatable bonds ≤ 10
TPSA ≤ 140

0.0
Egan?

Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from
Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.
WLOGP ≤ 5.88
TPSA ≤ 131.6

0.0
Muegge?

Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from
Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem.
200 ≤ MW ≤ 600
-2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5
TPSA ≤ 150
Num. rings ≤ 7
Num. carbon > 4
Num. heteroatoms > 1
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15
H-bond acc. ≤ 10
H-bond don. ≤ 5

4.0
Bioavailability Score?

Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat
implemented from
Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.

0.17

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS?

Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from
Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.

0.0 alert
Brenk?

Structural Alert: implemented from
Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem

0.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness?

Leadlikeness: implemented from
Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
250 ≤ MW ≤ 350
XLOGP ≤ 3.5
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7

No; 1 violation:MW<2.0
Synthetic accessibility?

Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult)
based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties,
trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r2 = 0.94)

4.85

Application In Synthesis of [ 52462-29-0 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 52462-29-0 ]

[ 52462-29-0 ] Synthesis Path-Downstream   1~35

  • 1
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 22795-99-9 ]
  • [Ru(II)((S)-(-)-2-aminomethyl-1-ethylpyrrolidine)(η6-p-cymene)Cl]Cl [ No CAS ]
  • 2
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 13406-29-6 ]
  • [ 169829-74-7 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
72% In tetrahydrofuran; at 20℃; for 2h;Inert atmosphere; General procedure: A 50-mL round-bottom flask was charged with [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (0.2029 g, 0.331 mmol) and CH2Cl2(20 mL). To the orange solution was added P(C6H4F)3 (0.2199 g, 0.695 mmol), and the mixture was leftto stir for 3 h at room temperature. The volatiles were removed in vacuo to leave a dark red oil, andhexanes were added to precipitate a solid product. The resulting orange solid was collected by vacuumfiltration and dried in vacuo (0.3529 g, 86percent yield).
  • 3
  • [ 2645-22-9 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 2923-28-6 ]
  • [(p-cymene)Ru(μ-4,4'-dipyridyldisulfide)Cl]2(OTf)2 [ No CAS ]
  • 4
  • [ 2645-22-9 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 1245080-66-3 ]
  • 5
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 402-69-7 ]
  • C16H17ClFNO2Ru [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
82.3% In ethanol; at 50℃; for 3h; 6-Fluoropyridine-2-carboxylic acid (HL3) (28 mg, 0.2 mmol) in ethanol (3 ml) was added to a solution of [Ru(eta6-p-cymene)Cl2]2 (61 mg, 0.1 mmol) in ethanol (5 ml) at 50 °C. The yellow solution was stirred for 3 h. The solvent was removed by one half under reduced pressure and the concentrated solution was placed in a fridge. Next day orange product was filtered off, washed with EtOH (5 ml) and dried in air.
  • 6
  • [ 6624-49-3 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • C20H20ClNO2Ru [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
61.8% In ethanol; at 20℃; for 2h; To a warm solution of [Ru(eta6-p-cymene)Cl2]2 (61 mg, 0.1 mmol) in ethanol (5 ml) <strong>[6624-49-3]isoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid</strong> (HL7) (38 mg,0.2 mmol) in ethanol (3 ml) was added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The yellow product was filtered off, washed with EtOH (5 ml) and dried in air.
  • 7
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 62-53-3 ]
  • C23H26ClN2Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 8
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 98-16-8 ]
  • C24H25ClF3N2Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 9
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 108-42-9 ]
  • C23H25Cl2N2Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 10
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 134-32-7 ]
  • C27H28ClN2Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 11
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 83-55-6 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • C27H28ClN2ORu(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 12
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 104-94-9 ]
  • C24H28ClN2ORu(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 13
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 150-13-0 ]
  • C24H26ClN2O2Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 14
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 2835-68-9 ]
  • C24H27ClN3ORu(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 15
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 123-30-8 ]
  • C23H26ClN2ORu(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 16
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 63-74-1 ]
  • C23H27ClN3O2RuS(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 17
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 98-18-0 ]
  • C22H25ClN3O2RuS(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 18
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 121-57-3 ]
  • C23H26ClN2O3RuS(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 19
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 3858-83-1 ]
  • C24H28ClN4Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 20
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 100142-87-8 ]
  • C29H31ClN3O2RuS(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 21
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 10165-86-3 ]
  • [ 62-53-3 ]
  • C24H26ClN2O2Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 22
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 98-16-8 ]
  • [ 10165-86-3 ]
  • C25H25ClF3N2O2Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 23
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 10165-86-3 ]
  • [ 108-42-9 ]
  • C24H25Cl2N2O2Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 24
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 134-32-7 ]
  • [ 10165-86-3 ]
  • C28H28ClN2O2Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 25
  • [ 83-55-6 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 10165-86-3 ]
  • C28H28ClN2O3Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 26
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 104-94-9 ]
  • [ 10165-86-3 ]
  • C25H28ClN2O3Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 27
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 150-13-0 ]
  • [ 10165-86-3 ]
  • C25H26ClN2O4Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 28
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 536-90-3 ]
  • C24H28ClN2ORu(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 29
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 591-27-5 ]
  • C23H26ClN2ORu(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 30
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 2836-04-6 ]
  • C25H31ClN3Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 31
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 455-14-1 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • C24H25ClF3N2Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 32
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 106-47-8 ]
  • C23H25Cl2N2Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 33
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 91-59-8 ]
  • C27H28ClN2Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 34
  • [ 55589-47-4 ]
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 99-98-9 ]
  • C25H31ClN3Ru(1+)*Cl(1-) [ No CAS ]
  • 35
  • [ 52462-29-0 ]
  • [ 2622-63-1 ]
  • chloro(η6-p-cymene)(1-methyl-2-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-κC,N)ruthenium(II), [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
60% With potassium acetate; In dichloromethane; at 20℃; for 20h;Inert atmosphere; Schlenk technique; Dichloromethane (10 mL) was added to dichloro(pcymene)ruthenium(II) dimer (0.16 mmol) in a round bottom flask. To this solution were added, L6 (0.33 mmol) followed by potassium acetate(0.38 mmol). The reaction mixturewas stirred at room temperature for 20 h. Then the solvent was evaporated and the residue leftbehind was dissolved in dichloromethane and the mixture wasfiltered. The filtratewas then added to large volume of diethyl etherresulting in a precipitate which was filtered and washed withdiethyl ether and dried. (90 mg, 60percent yield) 1H NMR (CDCl3,400 MHz): delta 0.80 (3H, d, J 6.8 Hz, isopropyl), 0.94 (3H, d,J 6.8 Hz, isopropyl), 2.08 (3H, s, methyl), 2.31 (1H, m, isopropyl),4.10 (3H, s, N-methyl), 5.14 (1H, d, J 5.9 Hz, cymene), 5.36 (1H, d,J 5.9 Hz cymene), 5.70 (1H, d, J 5.9 Hz, cymene), 5.84 (1H, d,J 5.9 Hz, cymene) 7.07 (1H, m, ArH), 7.21 (1H, m, ArH), 7.40 (3H, m,ArH), 7.80 (1H, m, ArH), 7.9 (1H, d, J 7.6 Hz, ArH), 8.33 (1H, d,J 7.6 Hz, ArH). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz): delta 19.42, 22.36, 23.08,31.35, 32.41, 81.77, 82.17, 89.26, 89.77, 99.43, 101.55, 110.27, 117.49,122.89, 123.48, 123.61, 124.80,129.36, 134.62, 136.74, 140.99, 141.84,158.86, 183.66. Elemental analysis for C24H25Cl1N2Ru, calcd. (percent) C,60.31; H, 5.27; N, 5.86. Found: C, 60.16; H, 5.14; N, 5.90.
 

Historical Records

Categories