Home Cart Sign in  
Chemical Structure| 17261-28-8 Chemical Structure| 17261-28-8
Chemical Structure| 17261-28-8
Product Citations

Product Citations

Marion H. Emmert ; Cuixian Yang ; Eugene E. Kwan ; Rebecca Chmielowski ; Bruce Kilgore ; Zachary L. VanAernum , et al.

Abstract: This manuscript describes the detailed evaluation of more than 40 phosphine reductants via automated and nonautomated high-throughput experimentation approaches with the goal of identifying selective reductants for cleaving the disulfide bonds of capped, engineered cysteines in a proprietary monoclonal antibody (mAb). As a point of reference, this study included phosphines that have previously been documented in the literature [4-diphenylphosphino benzoic acid (DPPBA), tris(3-sulfophenyl)phosphine (TSPP), and 3-(diphenylphosphino)benzenesulfonate (diPPBS)]; however, all known reductants showed the formation of undesired side products upon reduction (detectable by IEX), especially at higher phosphine loadings. The high_x005f_x0002_throughput study also revealed several phosphines with potential for selective reduction that had not been previously studied for this type of transformation. These initial hits were further evaluated with regard to the phosphine/mAb ratio, solubility in aqueous media, and air oxidation behavior. The best phosphine identified (1-(4-(diphenylphosphanyl)benzyl)-1-methylpyrrolidin-1-ium bromide (P10)) was then employed in a sequence of high-throughput studies that established efficient one-pot reduction/conjugation reaction conditions. Overall, the work detailed herein demonstrates how high-throughput experimental design enables rapid and resource-sparing insights into mAb reduction and conjugation reactivity with phosphine-based reductants.

Keywords: high-throughput experimentation (HTE) ; monoclonal antibody (mAb) ; disulfide bond reduction ; mAb decapping ; phosphines ; one-pot reduction/conjugation

Purchased from AmBeed: ; ; ;

Alternative Products

Product Details of [ 17261-28-8 ]

CAS No. :17261-28-8
Formula : C19H15O2P
M.W : 306.30
SMILES Code : O=C(O)C1=CC=CC=C1P(C2=CC=CC=C2)C3=CC=CC=C3
MDL No. :MFCD00674024
InChI Key :UYRPRYSDOVYCOU-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Pubchem ID :87021

Safety of [ 17261-28-8 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:Warning
Hazard Statements:H302-H315-H319-H332-H335
Precautionary Statements:P261-P280-P305+P351+P338

Calculated chemistry of [ 17261-28-8 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms 22
Num. arom. heavy atoms 18
Fraction Csp3 0.0
Num. rotatable bonds 4
Num. H-bond acceptors 2.0
Num. H-bond donors 1.0
Molar Refractivity 92.11
TPSA ?

Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from
Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.

50.89 Ų

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP)?

iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from
Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

2.76
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)?

XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by
XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry

4.13
Log Po/w (WLOGP)?

WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from
Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

3.14
Log Po/w (MLOGP)?

MLOGP: Topological method implemented from
Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.

4.4
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

4.87
Consensus Log Po/w?

Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions

3.86

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):?

ESOL: Topological method implemented from
Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-4.68
Solubility 0.00636 mg/ml ; 0.0000208 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Moderately soluble
Log S (Ali)?

Ali: Topological method implemented from
Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-4.91
Solubility 0.00381 mg/ml ; 0.0000124 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Moderately soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-6.9
Solubility 0.0000385 mg/ml ; 0.000000126 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Poorly soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption?

Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg

High
BBB permeant?

BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg

Yes
P-gp substrate?

P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set)
and tested on 415 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77
External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94

No
CYP1A2 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90
External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91

No
CYP2C19 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86
External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87

Yes
CYP2C9 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2075 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81

No
CYP2D6 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set)
and tested on 1068 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87

Yes
CYP3A4 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2579 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86

No
Log Kp (skin permeation)?

Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from
Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.

-5.24 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski?

Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from
Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
MW ≤ 500
MLOGP ≤ 4.15
N or O ≤ 10
NH or OH ≤ 5

1.0
Ghose?

Ghose filter: implemented from
Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem.
160 ≤ MW ≤ 480
-0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6
40 ≤ MR ≤ 130
20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70

None
Veber?

Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from
Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.
Rotatable bonds ≤ 10
TPSA ≤ 140

0.0
Egan?

Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from
Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.
WLOGP ≤ 5.88
TPSA ≤ 131.6

0.0
Muegge?

Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from
Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem.
200 ≤ MW ≤ 600
-2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5
TPSA ≤ 150
Num. rings ≤ 7
Num. carbon > 4
Num. heteroatoms > 1
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15
H-bond acc. ≤ 10
H-bond don. ≤ 5

0.0
Bioavailability Score?

Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat
implemented from
Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.

0.56

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS?

Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from
Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.

0.0 alert
Brenk?

Structural Alert: implemented from
Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem

1.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness?

Leadlikeness: implemented from
Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
250 ≤ MW ≤ 350
XLOGP ≤ 3.5
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7

No; 1 violation:MW<1.0
Synthetic accessibility?

Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult)
based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties,
trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r2 = 0.94)

3.64

Application In Synthesis of [ 17261-28-8 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 17261-28-8 ]
 

Historical Records

Technical Information

Categories