Home Cart Sign in  
Chemical Structure| 13063-60-0 Chemical Structure| 13063-60-0

Structure of 13063-60-0

Chemical Structure| 13063-60-0

*Storage: {[sel_prStorage]}

*Shipping: {[sel_prShipping]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}

4.5 *For Research Use Only !

{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]} Purity: {[proInfo.pro_purity]}

Change View

Size Price VIP Price

US Stock

Global Stock

In Stock
{[ item.pr_size ]} Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 5-7 days

  • {[ item.pr_size ]}

In Stock

- +

Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

  • 1-2 Day Shipping
  • High Quality
  • Technical Support
Product Citations

Alternative Products

Product Details of [ 13063-60-0 ]

CAS No. :13063-60-0
Formula : C12H25NO
M.W : 199.33
SMILES Code : CCCCCCCCN1CCOCC1
MDL No. :MFCD00047423
InChI Key :NMLNNXGEQCSYGQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Pubchem ID :83099

Safety of [ 13063-60-0 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:Warning
Hazard Statements:H302-H315-H319-H335
Precautionary Statements:P261-P305+P351+P338

Computational Chemistry of [ 13063-60-0 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms 14
Num. arom. heavy atoms 0
Fraction Csp3 1.0
Num. rotatable bonds 7
Num. H-bond acceptors 2.0
Num. H-bond donors 0.0
Molar Refractivity 65.58
TPSA ?

Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from
Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.

12.47 Ų

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP)?

iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from
Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

3.42
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)?

XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by
XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry

3.31
Log Po/w (WLOGP)?

WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from
Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

2.3
Log Po/w (MLOGP)?

MLOGP: Topological method implemented from
Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.

2.09
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

3.17
Consensus Log Po/w?

Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions

2.86

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):?

ESOL: Topological method implemented from
Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-2.7
Solubility 0.398 mg/ml ; 0.002 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble
Log S (Ali)?

Ali: Topological method implemented from
Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-3.25
Solubility 0.113 mg/ml ; 0.000565 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-3.29
Solubility 0.102 mg/ml ; 0.000512 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption?

Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg

High
BBB permeant?

BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg

Yes
P-gp substrate?

P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set)
and tested on 415 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77
External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94

No
CYP1A2 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90
External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91

No
CYP2C19 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86
External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP2C9 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2075 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81

No
CYP2D6 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set)
and tested on 1068 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP3A4 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2579 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86

No
Log Kp (skin permeation)?

Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from
Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.

-5.17 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski?

Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from
Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
MW ≤ 500
MLOGP ≤ 4.15
N or O ≤ 10
NH or OH ≤ 5

0.0
Ghose?

Ghose filter: implemented from
Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem.
160 ≤ MW ≤ 480
-0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6
40 ≤ MR ≤ 130
20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70

None
Veber?

Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from
Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.
Rotatable bonds ≤ 10
TPSA ≤ 140

0.0
Egan?

Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from
Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.
WLOGP ≤ 5.88
TPSA ≤ 131.6

0.0
Muegge?

Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from
Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem.
200 ≤ MW ≤ 600
-2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5
TPSA ≤ 150
Num. rings ≤ 7
Num. carbon > 4
Num. heteroatoms > 1
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15
H-bond acc. ≤ 10
H-bond don. ≤ 5

1.0
Bioavailability Score?

Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat
implemented from
Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.

0.55

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS?

Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from
Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.

0.0 alert
Brenk?

Structural Alert: implemented from
Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem

0.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness?

Leadlikeness: implemented from
Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
250 ≤ MW ≤ 350
XLOGP ≤ 3.5
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7

No; 1 violation:MW<1.0
Synthetic accessibility?

Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult)
based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties,
trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r2 = 0.94)

1.95

Application In Synthesis of [ 13063-60-0 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 13063-60-0 ]

[ 13063-60-0 ] Synthesis Path-Downstream   1~20

  • 1
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
  • [ 111-85-3 ]
  • 2
  • [ 5338-65-8 ]
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
  • 3
  • [ 111-86-4 ]
  • [ 111-46-6 ]
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
  • 4
  • [ 629-06-1 ]
  • 2.) ROCH2N(CH2)4O [ No CAS ]
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
  • 5
  • [ 5765-65-1 ]
  • n-octyl-Mg-X [ No CAS ]
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
  • 7
  • [ 31866-75-8 ]
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
  • 8
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
  • [ 25727-94-0 ]
  • 9
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
  • [ 2473-01-0 ]
  • 10
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
  • [ 1002-69-3 ]
  • 11
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
  • [ 82394-19-2 ]
  • 12
  • [ 543-59-9 ]
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
  • 13
  • [ 544-10-5 ]
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
  • 14
  • [ 82394-18-1 ]
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
  • 15
  • [ 110-91-8 ]
  • [ 111-83-1 ]
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
With sodium carbonate; In acetone; EXAMPLE 1C Preparation of N-Octyl Morpholinium Acetonitrile (OMA) Combined were 51.5 g of octylbromide, 29.88 g morpholine, and 28.0 g anhydrous sodium carbonate with 150 ml of acetone in a large round bottom flask. This mixture was refluxed for 8 hours at the boiling point of acetone or approximately 60 C., then cooled to room temperature and the solid sodium carbonate filtered. Acetone was removed using a roto-evaporator. The resulting oil was dissolved in ether and washed twice with water and once with brine solution. The ether solution was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. After filtering, ether was removed in-vacuo, leaving a slightly-colored oil. Gas chromatography showed the oil to be N-octyl morpholine, obtained with a yield of 98% and having greater than 95% purity.
  • 16
  • [ 110-91-8 ]
  • [ 111-87-5 ]
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
68% General procedure: The reaction of 1-octyl p-cymenesulphonate (4a) and 2-octyl p-cymenesulphonate (4c) with sodium methoxide led to the formation of the desired methyl octyl ethers (Scheme 2), as evidenced by NMR spectroscopy and GC-MS (Supplementary Information). The yields of methyl 1-octyl ether (5a) and for optimal conditions methyl 2-octyl ether (5b) are presented in Table 4, and are comparable to those established in the literature on similar substrates. 27 When the activated alcohols were reacted with excess morpholine, the p-cymenesulphonate esters underwent the anticipated substitution reaction, with yields of 68% (N-1-octyl morpholine, 6a) and 82% (N-2-octylmorpholine, 6b) achieved (Scheme 3).
  • 17
  • [ 4394-85-8 ]
  • [ 111-83-1 ]
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
90% With potassium hydroxide; In water; at 100℃; for 12.0h;Green chemistry; General procedure: KOH (2.4mmol), H2O (1.0mL), (pseudo)halides 1 (0.8mmol), and formamides 2 (1.6mmol) were successively added into a reaction tube. Then the reaction mixture was stirred under the conditions shown in Tables 1-5. After the reactions were completed, the mixture was extracted by ethyl acetate, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, concentrated under reduced pressure, and purified by flash chromatography to give products 3.
  • 18
  • [ 110-91-8 ]
  • [ 111-86-4 ]
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
  • [ 1120-48-5 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
81%; 18% With platinum-nickel nanoclusters on activated carbon; hydrogen; at 180℃; under 760.051 Torr;Flow reactor; General procedure: The reactions were performed in a flow-through reactor at atmospheric pressure and temperature 160-230. The reduced humid catalyst was loaded in the reactor between the glass layers of the nozzle and dried in a hydrogen stream at 120 prior to the reaction. The laboratory-grade reaction was a 12Kh18N10T steel tube (inner diameter 9 mm) put in an electric oven (heating zone height 50 mm). Temperature in the reactor was measured using a thermocouple. Hydrogen feed was adjusted using a GV-7 hydrogen generator. The feeding rate of the starting amines was 0.9 and 3.6 L kgcat-1 h-1 and that of hydrogen was 0.5 L h-1 gcat-1 at atmospheric pressure.
  • 19
  • [ 155127-38-1 ]
  • [ 13063-60-0 ]
 

Historical Records

Categories

Related Parent Nucleus of
[ 13063-60-0 ]

Morpholines

Chemical Structure| 39793-32-3

A186064 [39793-32-3]

5-Morpholinopentan-1-amine

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 95311-97-0

A504453 [95311-97-0]

4-Tetradecylmorpholine

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 4344-62-1

A556775 [4344-62-1]

5-Morpholinopentan-1-ol

Similarity: 0.96

Chemical Structure| 1005-67-0

A112838 [1005-67-0]

4-Butylmorpholine

Similarity: 0.96

Chemical Structure| 6321-07-9

A857360 [6321-07-9]

4-Morpholinobutan-1-amine

Similarity: 0.96