Home Cart Sign in  
Chemical Structure| 7051-16-3 Chemical Structure| 7051-16-3
Chemical Structure| 7051-16-3
Product Citations

Alternative Products

Product Details of [ 7051-16-3 ]

CAS No. :7051-16-3
Formula : C8H9ClO2
M.W : 172.61
SMILES Code : COC1=CC(OC)=CC(Cl)=C1
MDL No. :MFCD00008382
InChI Key :WQHNWJBSROXROL-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Pubchem ID :81502

Safety of [ 7051-16-3 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:Warning
Hazard Statements:H315-H319-H335
Precautionary Statements:P261-P305+P351+P338

Calculated chemistry of [ 7051-16-3 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms 11
Num. arom. heavy atoms 6
Fraction Csp3 0.25
Num. rotatable bonds 2
Num. H-bond acceptors 2.0
Num. H-bond donors 0.0
Molar Refractivity 44.44
TPSA ?

Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from
Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.

18.46 Ų

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP)?

iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from
Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

2.46
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)?

XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by
XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry

3.14
Log Po/w (WLOGP)?

WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from
Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

2.36
Log Po/w (MLOGP)?

MLOGP: Topological method implemented from
Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.

2.06
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

2.45
Consensus Log Po/w?

Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions

2.5

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):?

ESOL: Topological method implemented from
Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-3.16
Solubility 0.119 mg/ml ; 0.000692 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble
Log S (Ali)?

Ali: Topological method implemented from
Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-3.2
Solubility 0.11 mg/ml ; 0.000635 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-3.26
Solubility 0.094 mg/ml ; 0.000545 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption?

Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg

High
BBB permeant?

BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg

Yes
P-gp substrate?

P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set)
and tested on 415 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77
External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94

No
CYP1A2 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90
External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91

Yes
CYP2C19 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86
External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP2C9 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2075 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81

No
CYP2D6 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set)
and tested on 1068 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP3A4 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2579 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86

No
Log Kp (skin permeation)?

Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from
Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.

-5.12 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski?

Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from
Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
MW ≤ 500
MLOGP ≤ 4.15
N or O ≤ 10
NH or OH ≤ 5

0.0
Ghose?

Ghose filter: implemented from
Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem.
160 ≤ MW ≤ 480
-0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6
40 ≤ MR ≤ 130
20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70

None
Veber?

Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from
Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.
Rotatable bonds ≤ 10
TPSA ≤ 140

0.0
Egan?

Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from
Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.
WLOGP ≤ 5.88
TPSA ≤ 131.6

0.0
Muegge?

Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from
Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem.
200 ≤ MW ≤ 600
-2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5
TPSA ≤ 150
Num. rings ≤ 7
Num. carbon > 4
Num. heteroatoms > 1
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15
H-bond acc. ≤ 10
H-bond don. ≤ 5

1.0
Bioavailability Score?

Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat
implemented from
Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.

0.55

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS?

Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from
Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.

0.0 alert
Brenk?

Structural Alert: implemented from
Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem

0.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness?

Leadlikeness: implemented from
Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
250 ≤ MW ≤ 350
XLOGP ≤ 3.5
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7

No; 1 violation:MW<1.0
Synthetic accessibility?

Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult)
based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties,
trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r2 = 0.94)

1.62

Application In Synthesis [ 7051-16-3 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 7051-16-3 ]

[ 7051-16-3 ] Synthesis Path-Downstream   1~6

  • 1
  • [ 6086-21-1 ]
  • [ 7051-16-3 ]
  • [ 71597-10-9 ]
  • 2
  • [ 7051-16-3 ]
  • [ 73183-34-3 ]
  • [ 365564-07-4 ]
  • 3
  • 3-acetylphenylboron dihydroxide [ No CAS ]
  • [ 7051-16-3 ]
  • argon [ No CAS ]
  • [ 224311-51-7 ]
  • 3-acetyl-3',5'-dimethoxybiphenyl [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
232 mg (91%) With potassium fluoride;palladium diacetate; In tetrahydrofuran; EXAMPLE 48 Synthesis of 3-acetyl-3',5'-dimethoxybiphenyl An oven dried Schlenk tube was evacuated and backfilled with argon and charged with palladium acetate (2.2 mg, 0.01 mmol, 1.0 mol percent), 2-(di-tert-butylphosphino)biphenyl (6.0 mg, 0.020 mmol, 2.0 mol percent), 3,5-dimethoxyphenyl chloride (173 mg, 1.0 mmol), 3-acetylphenylboron dihydroxide (246 mg, 1.5 mmol), and potassium fluoride (174 mg, 3.0 mmol). The tube was evacuated and backfilled with argon, and THF (1 mL) was added through a rubber septum. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature until the starting aryl chloride had been completely consumed as judged by GC analysis. The reaction mixture was then diluted with ethyl acetate (30 mL) and poured into a separatory funnel. The mixture was washed with 2.0 M NaOH (20 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine (20 mL), dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated. The crude material was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel to afford 232 mg (91percent) of the title compound.
232 mg (91%) With potassium fluoride;palladium diacetate; In tetrahydrofuran; Example 48 Synthesis of 3-acetyl-3',5'-dimethoxybiphenyl An oven dried Schlenk tube was evacuated and backfilled with argon and charged with palladium acetate (2.2 mg, 0.01 mmol, 1.0 mol percent), 2-(di-tert-butylphosphino)biphenyl (6.0 mg, 0.020 mmol, 2.0 mol percent), 3,5-dimethoxyphenyl chloride (173 mg, 1.0 mmol), 3-acetylphenylboron dihydroxide (246 mg, 1.5 mmol), and potassium fluoride (174 mg, 3.0 mmol). The tube was evacuated and backfilled with argon, and THF (1 mL) was added through a rubber septum. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature until the starting aryl chloride had been completely consumed as judged by GC analysis. The reaction mixture was then diluted with ethyl acetate (30 mL) and poured into a separatory funnel. The mixture was washed with 2.0 M NaOH (20 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine (20 mL), dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated. The crude material was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel to afford 232 mg (91percent) of the title compound.
  • 6
  • [ 6914-71-2 ]
  • [ 7051-16-3 ]
  • C15H19ClO6 [ No CAS ]
 

Historical Records

Technical Information

Categories

Related Functional Groups of
[ 7051-16-3 ]

Aryls

Chemical Structure| 65262-96-6

A258565 [65262-96-6]

3-Chloro-5-methoxyphenol

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 2845-89-8

A112446 [2845-89-8]

1-Chloro-3-methoxybenzene

Similarity: 0.95

Chemical Structure| 623-12-1

A160728 [623-12-1]

1-Chloro-4-methoxybenzene

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 16766-30-6

A341868 [16766-30-6]

4-Chloro-2-methoxyphenol

Similarity: 0.90

Chemical Structure| 18113-03-6

A171762 [18113-03-6]

2-Chloro-4-methoxyphenol

Similarity: 0.88

Chlorides

Chemical Structure| 65262-96-6

A258565 [65262-96-6]

3-Chloro-5-methoxyphenol

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 2845-89-8

A112446 [2845-89-8]

1-Chloro-3-methoxybenzene

Similarity: 0.95

Chemical Structure| 623-12-1

A160728 [623-12-1]

1-Chloro-4-methoxybenzene

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 16766-30-6

A341868 [16766-30-6]

4-Chloro-2-methoxyphenol

Similarity: 0.90

Chemical Structure| 18113-03-6

A171762 [18113-03-6]

2-Chloro-4-methoxyphenol

Similarity: 0.88

Ethers

Chemical Structure| 65262-96-6

A258565 [65262-96-6]

3-Chloro-5-methoxyphenol

Similarity: 1.00

Chemical Structure| 2845-89-8

A112446 [2845-89-8]

1-Chloro-3-methoxybenzene

Similarity: 0.95

Chemical Structure| 623-12-1

A160728 [623-12-1]

1-Chloro-4-methoxybenzene

Similarity: 0.92

Chemical Structure| 16766-30-6

A341868 [16766-30-6]

4-Chloro-2-methoxyphenol

Similarity: 0.90

Chemical Structure| 18113-03-6

A171762 [18113-03-6]

2-Chloro-4-methoxyphenol

Similarity: 0.88