Home Cart Sign in  
Chemical Structure| 131-58-8 Chemical Structure| 131-58-8

Structure of 2-Methylbenzophenone
CAS No.: 131-58-8

Chemical Structure| 131-58-8

*Storage: {[sel_prStorage]}

*Shipping: {[sel_prShipping]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}

4.5 *For Research Use Only !

{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]} Purity: {[proInfo.pro_purity]}

Change View

Size Price VIP Price

US Stock

Global Stock

In Stock
{[ item.pr_size ]} Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 5-7 days

  • {[ item.pr_size ]}

In Stock

- +

Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

  • 1-2 Day Shipping
  • High Quality
  • Technical Support
Product Citations

Alternative Products

Product Details of [ 131-58-8 ]

CAS No. :131-58-8
Formula : C14H12O
M.W : 196.24
SMILES Code : O=C(C1=CC=CC=C1)C2=CC=CC=C2C
MDL No. :MFCD00008518
InChI Key :CKGKXGQVRVAKEA-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Pubchem ID :67230

Safety of [ 131-58-8 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:Warning
Hazard Statements:H315-H319-H335
Precautionary Statements:P261-P305+P351+P338

Computational Chemistry of [ 131-58-8 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms 15
Num. arom. heavy atoms 12
Fraction Csp3 0.07
Num. rotatable bonds 2
Num. H-bond acceptors 1.0
Num. H-bond donors 0.0
Molar Refractivity 61.28
TPSA ?

Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from
Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.

17.07 Ų

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP)?

iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from
Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

2.37
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)?

XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by
XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry

3.12
Log Po/w (WLOGP)?

WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from
Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

3.23
Log Po/w (MLOGP)?

MLOGP: Topological method implemented from
Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.

3.26
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

3.91
Consensus Log Po/w?

Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions

3.18

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):?

ESOL: Topological method implemented from
Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-3.48
Solubility 0.0646 mg/ml ; 0.000329 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble
Log S (Ali)?

Ali: Topological method implemented from
Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-3.15
Solubility 0.14 mg/ml ; 0.000712 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-5.25
Solubility 0.00109 mg/ml ; 0.00000557 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Moderately soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption?

Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg

High
BBB permeant?

BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg

Yes
P-gp substrate?

P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set)
and tested on 415 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77
External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94

No
CYP1A2 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90
External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91

Yes
CYP2C19 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86
External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87

Yes
CYP2C9 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2075 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81

No
CYP2D6 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set)
and tested on 1068 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP3A4 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2579 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86

No
Log Kp (skin permeation)?

Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from
Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.

-5.28 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski?

Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from
Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
MW ≤ 500
MLOGP ≤ 4.15
N or O ≤ 10
NH or OH ≤ 5

0.0
Ghose?

Ghose filter: implemented from
Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem.
160 ≤ MW ≤ 480
-0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6
40 ≤ MR ≤ 130
20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70

None
Veber?

Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from
Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.
Rotatable bonds ≤ 10
TPSA ≤ 140

0.0
Egan?

Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from
Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.
WLOGP ≤ 5.88
TPSA ≤ 131.6

0.0
Muegge?

Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from
Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem.
200 ≤ MW ≤ 600
-2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5
TPSA ≤ 150
Num. rings ≤ 7
Num. carbon > 4
Num. heteroatoms > 1
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15
H-bond acc. ≤ 10
H-bond don. ≤ 5

2.0
Bioavailability Score?

Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat
implemented from
Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.

0.55

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS?

Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from
Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.

0.0 alert
Brenk?

Structural Alert: implemented from
Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem

0.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness?

Leadlikeness: implemented from
Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
250 ≤ MW ≤ 350
XLOGP ≤ 3.5
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7

No; 1 violation:MW<1.0
Synthetic accessibility?

Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult)
based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties,
trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r2 = 0.94)

1.49

Application In Synthesis of [ 131-58-8 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 131-58-8 ]

[ 131-58-8 ] Synthesis Path-Downstream   1~8

  • 1
  • [ 76339-61-2 ]
  • [ 108-88-3 ]
  • [ 599-66-6 ]
  • [ 134-84-9 ]
  • [ 131-58-8 ]
  • [ 41908-97-8 ]
  • 2
  • [ 108-88-3 ]
  • [ 599-66-6 ]
  • [ 134-84-9 ]
  • [ 131-58-8 ]
  • [ 41908-97-8 ]
  • 4
  • [ 615-37-2 ]
  • [ 201230-82-2 ]
  • [ 98-80-6 ]
  • [ 131-58-8 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
91% With palladium diacetate; sodium carbonate; In water; at 100℃; under 760.051 Torr; for 10h;Sealed tube; Autoclave; Green chemistry; General procedure: A 75 mL autoclave equipped with a Teflon liner and a magnetic stirrer bar was charged with Pd(OAc)2 (4.48 mg, 2.0 × 10-2 mmol), L (46.7 mg, 4.0 × 10-2 mmol) and H2O (6 mL) and the mixture was stirred at room temperatures for 0.5 h under N2. Then iodobenzene (113 μL, 1 mmol), phenylboronic acid (134 mg, 1.1 mmol), Na2CO3(106 mg, 1 mmol), and n-decane (0.1 mL, GC internal standard) were added. Once sealed, the autoclave was purged three times with CO, and pressurized to 1 atm of CO. The reaction mixture was stirred at 100 C for 2 h. After reaction, the mixture was extracted with diethyl ether (3 × 5 mL). The combined organic layer was concentrated in vacuo and the product was purified by column chromatography. In the recycling experiment, the aqueous phase containing the catalyst was subjected to a second run by charging it with the same substrates as mentioned above, and the reaction performed under the same conditions.
90% With potassium phosphate; nickel dichloride; Trimethylacetic acid; at 80℃; under 760.051 Torr; for 18h;Green chemistry; General procedure: Into a 25 ml reaction flask was successively added nickel chloride (0.01 mmol), substituted or non-substituted aryliodide (table 1) (0.5 mmol), phenylboronic acid (0.75 mmol), potassium phosphate (1.0 mmol), pivalic acid (0.25 mmol) and polyethylene glycol 400 (2.0 g), and introduce one atmospheric pressure carbon monoxide. The reaction mixture at 80 C react until starting material reaction complete and cool to room temperature, pressure reducing evaporate the solvent column chromatography separation to obtain the product. The experimental results are set out in table 1.
81% With potassium fluoride; potassium phosphate; copper; Trimethylacetic acid; at 100℃; under 760.051 Torr; for 24h; General procedure: A 25 mL reaction flask was charged with copper nanoparticles (0.1 mmol)Aryl diiodonium (0.5 mmol),Benzene boronic acid (1.5 mmol),Potassium phosphate (1.0 mmol),Potassium fluoride (0.5 mmol), pivalic acid (0.5 mmol) and polyethylene glycol-400 (2.0 g)And the introduction of an atmospheric carbon monoxide.The reaction mixture was reacted at 100 C until the reaction was complete and cooled to room temperature,The product was isolated by column chromatography after evaporation of the solvent under reduced pressure.
73% With potassium carbonate; at 90℃; under 3361.55 Torr; for 8h;Autoclave;Catalytic behavior; General procedure: In a 100 mL, autoclave equipped with magnetic stirrer (Fig. 1),phenyl boronic acid (1 mmol), iodobenzene (1 mmol), potassiumcarbonate (3 equiv.), anisole (5 mL) and Pd(PS-SAL) catalyst (15 mg,0.01 mmol based on Pd active centre) were added. Then it waspurged three times with carbon monoxide (65 psi) and after closingthe autoclave tightly, it was heated at 90 C. The reaction wascontinued for 8 h, cooled at room temperature then Pd(PS-SAL)catalyst was removed from the reaction system and washeddown with methanol. The organic content was dried out absolutelywith sodium sulfate after work up it with ethyl acetate (3 x 10 mL)followed by water. The unstable components were allowed toevaporate through a rotary evaporator. The solid product wasanalyzed by 1H NMR spectroscopy (supporting information).

  • 5
  • [ 615-37-2 ]
  • [ 201230-82-2 ]
  • [ 780-69-8 ]
  • [ 131-58-8 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
80% With dichloro bis(acetonitrile) palladium(II); cesium fluoride; In 1-methyl-pyrrolidin-2-one; at 80℃; under 760.051 Torr; for 6h; General procedure: A mixture of aryl silane (0.5 mmol), aryl iodines (0.5 mmol), PdCl2(MeCN)2 (5 mol%), and CsF (0.5 mmol) was stirred at 80oC for 6 h in NMP (5 mL) under CO (1atm). Afterwards, 2 mL water was added to the reaction solution and then filtered through a filter paper and the solution was extracted by Et2O (2 mL) for three times. The organic phase was combined and evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was purified on a SiO2 column to afford the desired product (ethyl acetate/hexane).
  • 6
  • [ 615-37-2 ]
  • [ 201230-82-2 ]
  • [ 71-43-2 ]
  • [ 131-58-8 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
87% With bis(η3-allyl-μ-chloropalladium(II)); silver trifluoromethanesulfonate; In 1,2-dichloro-ethane; at 100℃; under 3040.2 Torr; for 24h;Inert atmosphere; Sealed tube; Glovebox; Schlenk technique; Green chemistry; General procedure: Under an inert nitrogen atmosphere, silver triflate (386 mg,1.5 mmol) was transferred to a Teflon sealed thick-walled 50 ml glass reaction vessel equipped with a stir bar, followed by aryl iodide (1.0 mmol), arene (2.0 mmol), DCE (4 ml) and then a freshly prepared stock solution of [Pd(allyl)Cl]2 (0.2 mg, 5 × 10-4 mmol). The vessel was closed, removed from the glovebox, evacuated and backfilled with carbon monoxide three times, and finally pressurized with 4 atm carbon monoxide. After heating at 100 C for 24 h with stirring, the reaction was cooled to room temperature and carbon monoxide was released. The reaction mixture was filtered through Celite, eluting with dichloromethane. Saturated NaHCO3 was added and the aqueous layer was extracted with dichloromethane. The combined organic layers were concentrated in vacuo and the residue was purified by column chromatography (silica gel, gradient hexane/ethyl acetate 0 to 20%) to afford the pure ketone product.
  • 7
  • [ 2936-62-1 ]
  • [ 131-58-8 ]
  • 8
  • [ 19063-56-0 ]
  • [ 131-58-8 ]
  • 3-bromo-7-hydroxy-7-phenyltetrahydro-6H-naphtho[2,3-c]chromen-6-one [ No CAS ]
 

Historical Records

Technical Information

Categories