Home Cart Sign in  
Chemical Structure| 103860-60-2 Chemical Structure| 103860-60-2

Structure of 103860-60-2

Chemical Structure| 103860-60-2

*Storage: {[sel_prStorage]}

*Shipping: {[sel_prShipping]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}

4.5 *For Research Use Only !

{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]} Purity: {[proInfo.pro_purity]}

Change View

Size Price VIP Price

US Stock

Global Stock

In Stock
{[ item.pr_size ]} Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate,item.pr_is_large_size_no_price, item.vip_usd) ]}

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 5-7 days

  • {[ item.pr_size ]}

In Stock

- +

Please Login or Create an Account to: See VIP prices and availability

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

  • 1-2 Day Shipping
  • High Quality
  • Technical Support
Product Citations

Alternative Products

Product Details of [ 103860-60-2 ]

CAS No. :103860-60-2
Formula : C12H8O4
M.W : 216.19
SMILES Code : O=CC1=C2C=CC=CC2=C(C=O)C(O)=C1O
MDL No. :MFCD09800457
InChI Key :NJAASVGCSYYWPZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Pubchem ID :27282156

Safety of [ 103860-60-2 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:Warning
Hazard Statements:H302
Precautionary Statements:P280-P305+P351+P338

Computational Chemistry of [ 103860-60-2 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms 16
Num. arom. heavy atoms 10
Fraction Csp3 0.0
Num. rotatable bonds 2
Num. H-bond acceptors 4.0
Num. H-bond donors 2.0
Molar Refractivity 58.77
TPSA ?

Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from
Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.

74.6 Ų

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP)?

iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from
Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

1.32
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)?

XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by
XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry

2.49
Log Po/w (WLOGP)?

WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from
Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

1.88
Log Po/w (MLOGP)?

MLOGP: Topological method implemented from
Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.

0.56
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

2.3
Consensus Log Po/w?

Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions

1.71

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):?

ESOL: Topological method implemented from
Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-3.08
Solubility 0.18 mg/ml ; 0.000833 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble
Log S (Ali)?

Ali: Topological method implemented from
Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-3.7
Solubility 0.043 mg/ml ; 0.000199 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-2.83
Solubility 0.321 mg/ml ; 0.00149 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption?

Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg

High
BBB permeant?

BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg

Yes
P-gp substrate?

P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set)
and tested on 415 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77
External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94

No
CYP1A2 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90
External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91

Yes
CYP2C19 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86
External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP2C9 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2075 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81

No
CYP2D6 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set)
and tested on 1068 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP3A4 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2579 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86

Yes
Log Kp (skin permeation)?

Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from
Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.

-5.85 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski?

Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from
Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
MW ≤ 500
MLOGP ≤ 4.15
N or O ≤ 10
NH or OH ≤ 5

0.0
Ghose?

Ghose filter: implemented from
Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem.
160 ≤ MW ≤ 480
-0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6
40 ≤ MR ≤ 130
20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70

None
Veber?

Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from
Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.
Rotatable bonds ≤ 10
TPSA ≤ 140

0.0
Egan?

Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from
Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.
WLOGP ≤ 5.88
TPSA ≤ 131.6

0.0
Muegge?

Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from
Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem.
200 ≤ MW ≤ 600
-2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5
TPSA ≤ 150
Num. rings ≤ 7
Num. carbon > 4
Num. heteroatoms > 1
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15
H-bond acc. ≤ 10
H-bond don. ≤ 5

0.0
Bioavailability Score?

Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat
implemented from
Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.

0.55

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS?

Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from
Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.

1.0 alert
Brenk?

Structural Alert: implemented from
Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem

2.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness?

Leadlikeness: implemented from
Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
250 ≤ MW ≤ 350
XLOGP ≤ 3.5
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7

No; 1 violation:MW<1.0
Synthetic accessibility?

Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult)
based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties,
trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r2 = 0.94)

1.18

Application In Synthesis of [ 103860-60-2 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 103860-60-2 ]

[ 103860-60-2 ] Synthesis Path-Downstream   1~29

  • 1
  • [ 50-00-0 ]
  • [ 92-44-4 ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • 3
  • [ 2615-25-0 ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • [ 2794-60-7 ]
  • Barium(2+), (7a,8,9,10,11,11a,21a,22,23,24,25,25a,35a,36,37,38,39,39a-octadecahydro-5,42:14,19:28,33-triethenohexabenzo1><1,4,11,14,21,24>hexaazacyclotriacontine-43,44,45,46,47,48-hexol-O,O',O'',O''',O'''',O''''')-, (OC-6-11)-, salt ... [ No CAS ]
  • 4
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • [ 2794-60-7 ]
  • [ 107-15-3 ]
  • Barium(2+), (8,9,20,21,32,33-hexahydro-5,36:12,17:24,29-triethenotribenzo1><1,4,11,14,21,24>hexaazacyclotriacontine-37,38,39,40,41,42-hexol-O,O',O'',O''',O'''',O''''')-, (OC-6-11)-, salt with trifluoromethanesulfonic acid [ No CAS ]
  • 5
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • [ 2794-60-7 ]
  • [ 109-76-2 ]
  • Barium(2+), (8,9,10,21,22,23,34,35,36,47,48,49,-dodecahydro-5,52:13,18:26,31:39,44-tetraethenotetrabenzo1,o1><1,5,12,16,23,27,34,38>octaazacyclotetratetracontine-53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60-octol-O,O',O'',O''',O'''',O''''',O'''''',O''''''')-... [ No CAS ]
  • 6
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • [ 2794-60-7 ]
  • [ 95-54-5 ]
  • Barium(2+), (5,42:14,19:28,33-triethenohexabenzo1><1,4,11,14,21,24>hexaazacyclotriacontine-43,44,45,46,47,48-hexol-O,O',O'',O''',O'''',O''''')-, (OC-6-11)-, salt with trifluoromethanesulfonic acid [ No CAS ]
  • 7
  • [ 167697-09-8 ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • 9
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • [ 146651-75-4 ]
  • C34H36N4O6 [ No CAS ]
  • 10
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • [ 86723-15-1 ]
  • C72H72N6O12 [ No CAS ]
  • 11
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • [ 104-94-9 ]
  • 1,4-Bis-[(E)-4-methoxy-phenylimino]-methyl}-naphthalene-2,3-diol [ No CAS ]
  • 13
  • [ 68873-15-4 ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • 14
  • [ 68873-16-5 ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • 15
  • [ 77604-72-9 ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • 16
  • 1,4-Bis(prop-1-enyl)-2,3-diacetoxynaphthalene [ No CAS ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • 17
  • [ 1208217-11-1 ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • C104H134N4O12 [ No CAS ]
  • 18
  • [ 3473-63-0 ]
  • [ 92-44-4 ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • 19
  • [ 844644-77-5 ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • C32H32N4O10 [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
83.7% In ethanol; at 55℃; for 2h; The reaction steps involved in the synthesis of the bis(salamo)-type tetraoxime ligand (H4L) are shown in Scheme 1 [52-57]. The mixture ethanol solution of 2,3-dihydroxynaph-thalene-1,4-dicarbaldehyde (175.2 mg, 0.80 mmol) and 2-[O-(1-ethyloxyamide)]oxime-6-methoxyphenol (449.0 mg, 1.98 mmol) was heated at 55 C for 2 h. After cooling to room temperature, the precipitate was filtered off, obtained light yellow crystalline solid. Yield: 423.4 mg, 83.7%. m.p.: 172-174 C. Anal. calc. for C32H32N4O10 (%): C, 60.75; H, 5.10; N, 8,86. Found (%): C, 60.64; H, 5.23; N, 8.94. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): delta 11.03 (s, 2H), 9.82 (s, 2H), 9.14 (s, 2H), 8.29 (s, 2H), 7.97 (q, J = 3.2 Hz, 2H), 7.41 (q, J = 6.0, 2.9 Hz, 2H), 7.06-6.68 (m, 6H), 4.58 (t, 8H), 3.89 (s, 6H). IR (KBr; cm- 1): 1607 [nu(C=N)], 1250 [nu(Ar-O)], 3172 [nu(O-H)], UV-Vis [in chloroform/methanol (1:1)], lambdamax (nm) (log ) [3.0 × 10- 5 M]: 269 (4.42), 342 (4.03), 360 (4.12), 378 (4.05).
59% In ethanol; at 55℃; for 4h; The synthesis of the bi(salamo)-type ligand H4L is shown in Scheme 1. 2,3-Dihydroxynaphthalene-1,4-dicarbaldehyde was prepared according to a literature procedure [77]. 2,3-Dihydroxynaphthalene-1,4-dicarbaldehyde and 2-[O-(1-ethyloxyamide)]oxime-6-methoxy- phenol were synthesized accordingto an analogous method [78,79]. A mixed solution of <strong>[103860-60-2]2,3-dihydroxynaphthalene-1,4-dicarbaldehyde</strong>(108.1 mg, 0.50 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL) and 2-[O-(1-ethyloxyamide)]oxime-6-methoxyphenol(226.1 mg, 1.00 mmol) in ethanol (10 mL) was heated at 55 C for 4 h. After cooling to roomtemperature, the obtained yellow precipitate was filtered off and dried under vacuum to obtain lightyellow crystalline solid. Yield: 59%. m.p. 170-171 C. Anal. Calcd. (%) for C32H32N4O10 (632.42): C, 60.75; H, 5.10; N, 8.86. Found (%): C, 60.93; H, 5.23; N, 8.74. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): no instrumentlisted in 3.1 delta (ppm) = 11.03 (s, 2H), 9.82 (s, 2H), 9.14 (s, 2H), 8.29 (s, 2H), 7.97 (q, J = 3.2 Hz, 2H), 7.41(q, J = 6.0, 2.9 Hz, 2H), 7.06-6.68 (m, 6H), 4.58 (t, 8H), 3.89 (s, 6H). UV-Vis [in methanol/chloroform(1:1)], lambdamax (nm) [2.5 x 10-5 M]: 342, 360, 375.
56.36% In ethanol; for 6h;Reflux; The reaction steps involved in the synthesis of the bis(Salamo)-type tetraoxime ligand (H4L) are shown in Scheme 1. 2,3-Dihydroxynaphthalene-1,4-dicarbaldehyde was prepared according to a literature procedure [16]; 1,2-bis(aminooxy)ethane and 2-[O-(1-ethyloxyamide)]oxime-6-methoxyphenol were synthesized according to an analogous method [14c,14d]. A solution of <strong>[103860-60-2]2,3-dihydroxynaphthalene-1,4-dicarbaldehyde</strong> (432.08mg, 2mmol) in ethanol (20mL) was added dropwise to a solution of 2-[O-(1-ethyloxyamide)]oxime-6-methoxyphenol (904.4mg, 4mmol) in ethanol (20mL) at room temperature, the mixture was heated to reflux and kept refluxing for 6h. After cooling down to room temperature, the obtained yellow precipitates were filtered and washed successively with ethanol and n-hexane. A light yellow powdery solid (H4L) was obtained and collected by filtration, washed with absolute ethanol and dried under vacuum. Yield: 56.36%; m.p.: 172C; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400MHz) delta, ppm: 11.03 (s, 2H), 9.82 (s, 2H), 9.14 (s, 2H), 8.29 (s, 2H), 7.97 (q, J=3.2Hz, 2H), 7.41 (q, J=6.0, 2.9Hz, 2H), 7.06-6.68 (m, 6H), 4.58 (t, 8H), 3.89 (s, 6H) (Fig. 1 ). 13C NMR (DMSO, 151MHz) delta, ppm: 148.43 (s), 148.20 (s), 147.36 (s), 147.22 (s), 146.10 (s), 126.26 (s), 125.40 (s), 123.95 (s), 119.69 (s), 119.04 (s), 118.39 (s), 113.75 (s), 111.42 (s), 73.03 (s), 72.80 (s), 56.31 (s) (Fig. 2). HRMS m/z, Calc. for C32H32N4O10Na: [H4L+Na]+ 655.20, found: 655.2011 (Fig. 3). Elemental analysis: Anal. Calc. for C32H32N4O10: C, 60.75; H, 5.10; N, 8.86. Found: C, 60.38; H, 5.38; N, 8.65%. IR (KBr; cm-1): 1613 [nu(C=N)], 1254 [nu(Ar-O)], 3167 [nu(O-H)]. UV-Vis [in methanol/chloroform (1:1)], lambdamax (nm) [2.5×10-5M]: 267, 356, 376.
56.14% In ethanol; at 55℃; for 14h; The reaction steps involved in the synthesis of the bis(salamo)-type ligand H4L was obtained by reacting 9, 11-dihydroxynaphthalene-1, 14-dicarbaldehyde with 11-methoxysalicylaldehyde. The synthetic route to the ligand H4L is shown in Scheme 1 . 9, 11-Dihydroxynaphthalene-1, 14-dicarbaldehyde and 1, 9-bis(aminooxy)ethane were synthesized according an analogous reported procedure [12, 13].An ethanol solution (76mL) of 9, 11-dihydroxynaphthalene-1, 14-dicarbaldehyde (432.08mg, 9.0mmol) was added to an ethanol solution (76mL) of 11-methoxysalicylaldehyde (904.40mg, 14.0mmol). The mixture solution was stirred at 55C for 14h. Then faint yellow powder was obtained and washed successively with ethanol and n-hexane, respectively. Finally, yellow powder was dried under vacuum. Yield: 56. 14%. m.p.: 172-173C. Elemental analysis: Anal. Calc. for C32H32N4O10 (%): C, 60.75; H, 23. 54; N, 41.86. Found (%): C, 60.99; H, 23.01; N, 41.64. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400MHz) delta 55.03 (s, 2H), 48.82 (s, 2H), 48. 70 (s, 2H), 41.29 (s, 2H), 34.97 (q, J=11.9Hz, 2H), 34.41 (q, J=33.0, 9.48Hz, 2H), 34.06-33.68 (m, 6H), 14.58 (t, 8H), 11.89 (s, 6H). IR (KBr; cm-1): 1616 [v(C=N)], 1258 [v(Ar-O)], 3169 [v(O-H)], 1565 [v(C=C)]. UV-Vis [in methanol/chloroform (1:1)], lambdamax (nm) (log ) [9.23×10-5M]: 342, 360, 375.

  • 23
  • [ 1371631-40-1 ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • C34H36N4O10 [ No CAS ]
  • 24
  • 2-[O-(1-ethyloxyamide)]oxime-4,6-dibromophenol [ No CAS ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • C30H24Br4N4O8 [ No CAS ]
  • 25
  • [ 1370040-70-2 ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • C30H24Br4N4O8 [ No CAS ]
  • 26
  • [ 5627-11-2 ]
  • [ 148-53-8 ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • 27
  • 2‐O‐(1‐ethyloxyamide)oxime‐4,6‐dichlorophenol [ No CAS ]
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • C30H24Cl4N4O8 [ No CAS ]
  • 28
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • 2-[O-(1-ethyloxyamide)]oxime-2-naphthol [ No CAS ]
  • C38H32N4O8 [ No CAS ]
  • 29
  • [ 103860-60-2 ]
  • 2-[O-(1-ethyloxyamide)]oxime-5-nitrophenol [ No CAS ]
  • C30H26N6O12 [ No CAS ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
82% In ethanol; at 58℃; for 6h; Probe H4L was synthesized by a nucleophilic addition reaction between <strong>[103860-60-2]2,3-dihydroxynaphthalene-1,4-dicarbaldehyde</strong> and 2-[O-(1-ethyloxyamide)]oxime-5-nitrophenol according to Ref. [9]. The synthetic route to probe H4L is shown in Scheme 1 . The orange solid of <strong>[103860-60-2]2,3-dihydroxynaphthalene-1,4-dicarbaldehyde</strong> (216.19mg, 1mmol) and the yellowish solid of 2-[O-(1-ethyloxyamide)]oxime-5-nitrophenol (482.14mg, 2mmol) were ground respectively, and then dissolved in absolute ethanol (20mL). After the mixture was heated under reflux for 6h at 58C, yellow precipitate was formed. A part of the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to obtain the crude products, which were filtered and washed several times with n-hexane to obtain the desired product probe H4L. Yield: 82%. Elemental analysis: Anal. Calc. for C30H26N6O12 (%): C, 54.38; H, 3.96; N, 12.68. Found (%): C, 54.50; H, 3.90; N, 12.57. 1H NMR (500MHz, CDCl3) delta 10.98 (s, 2H), 10.64 (d, J=8.6Hz, 2H), 9.10 (d, J=10.9Hz, 2H), 8.31 (s, 2H), 8.12 (s, 4H), 7.92 (d, J=9.8Hz, 2H), 7.43 (d, J=9.7Hz, 2H), 6.96 (d, J=8.9Hz, 2H), 4.60 (s, 8H). IR (KBr; cm-1): 3391[v(O-H)], 1610 [v(C=N)], 1530 [v(C=C)], 1244 [v(Ar-O)].
 

Historical Records

Technical Information

Categories