Home Cart Sign in  
HazMat Fee +

There will be a HazMat fee per item when shipping a dangerous goods. The HazMat fee will be charged to your UPS/DHL/FedEx collect account or added to the invoice unless the package is shipped via Ground service. Ship by air in Excepted Quantity (each bottle), which is up to 1g/1mL for class 6.1 packing group I or II, and up to 25g/25ml for all other HazMat items.

Type HazMat fee for 500 gram (Estimated)
Excepted Quantity USD 0.00
Limited Quantity USD 15-60
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), Domestic USD 80+
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), International USD 150+
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), Domestic USD 100+
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), International USD 200+
Chemical Structure| 14542-13-3 Chemical Structure| 14542-13-3
Chemical Structure| 14542-13-3

2-Methoxythiazole

CAS No.: 14542-13-3

4.5 *For Research Use Only !

Cat. No.: A220138 Purity: 98%

Change View

Size Price

US Stock

Global Stock

In Stock
10g łÇ§¶ÊÊ Inquiry Inquiry
25g łËʶÊÊ Inquiry Inquiry

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

  • 10g

    łÇ§¶ÊÊ

  • 25g

    łËʶÊÊ

In Stock

- +

US Stock: ship in 0-1 business day
Global Stock: ship in 2 weeks

  • 1-2 Day Shipping
  • High Quality
  • Technical Support
Product Citations

Alternative Products

Product Details of [ 14542-13-3 ]

CAS No. :14542-13-3
Formula : C4H5NOS
M.W : 115.15
SMILES Code : COC1=NC=CS1
MDL No. :MFCD01631143
InChI Key :MJJRDTKNLLMJDJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Pubchem ID :575451

Safety of [ 14542-13-3 ]

GHS Pictogram:
Signal Word:Danger
Hazard Statements:H225
Precautionary Statements:P210-P403+P235
Class:3
UN#:1993
Packing Group:

Computational Chemistry of [ 14542-13-3 ] Show Less

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms 7
Num. arom. heavy atoms 5
Fraction Csp3 0.25
Num. rotatable bonds 1
Num. H-bond acceptors 2.0
Num. H-bond donors 0.0
Molar Refractivity 28.61
TPSA ?

Topological Polar Surface Area: Calculated from
Ertl P. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.

50.36 Ų

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP)?

iLOGP: in-house physics-based method implemented from
Daina A et al. 2014 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

1.65
Log Po/w (XLOGP3)?

XLOGP3: Atomistic and knowledge-based method calculated by
XLOGP program, version 3.2.2, courtesy of CCBG, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry

1.26
Log Po/w (WLOGP)?

WLOGP: Atomistic method implemented from
Wildman SA and Crippen GM. 1999 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

1.15
Log Po/w (MLOGP)?

MLOGP: Topological method implemented from
Moriguchi I. et al. 1992 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Moriguchi I. et al. 1994 Chem. Pharm. Bull.
Lipinski PA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev.

-0.2
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Hybrid fragmental/topological method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

2.16
Consensus Log Po/w?

Consensus Log Po/w: Average of all five predictions

1.2

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL):?

ESOL: Topological method implemented from
Delaney JS. 2004 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-1.81
Solubility 1.78 mg/ml ; 0.0155 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Very soluble
Log S (Ali)?

Ali: Topological method implemented from
Ali J. et al. 2012 J. Chem. Inf. Model.

-1.92
Solubility 1.4 mg/ml ; 0.0121 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Very soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT)?

SILICOS-IT: Fragmental method calculated by
FILTER-IT program, version 1.0.2, courtesy of SILICOS-IT, http://www.silicos-it.com

-1.37
Solubility 4.96 mg/ml ; 0.0431 mol/l
Class?

Solubility class: Log S scale
Insoluble < -10 < Poorly < -6 < Moderately < -4 < Soluble < -2 Very < 0 < Highly

Soluble

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption?

Gatrointestinal absorption: according to the white of the BOILED-Egg

High
BBB permeant?

BBB permeation: according to the yolk of the BOILED-Egg

Yes
P-gp substrate?

P-glycoprotein substrate: SVM model built on 1033 molecules (training set)
and tested on 415 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.72 / AUC=0.77
External: ACC=0.88 / AUC=0.94

No
CYP1A2 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9145 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.83 / AUC=0.90
External: ACC=0.84 / AUC=0.91

No
CYP2C19 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C19 inhibitor: SVM model built on 9272 molecules (training set)
and tested on 3000 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.86
External: ACC=0.80 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP2C9 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2C9 inhibitor: SVM model built on 5940 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2075 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.71 / AUC=0.81

No
CYP2D6 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 2D6 inhibitor: SVM model built on 3664 molecules (training set)
and tested on 1068 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.79 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.81 / AUC=0.87

No
CYP3A4 inhibitor?

Cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor: SVM model built on 7518 molecules (training set)
and tested on 2579 molecules (test set)
10-fold CV: ACC=0.77 / AUC=0.85
External: ACC=0.78 / AUC=0.86

No
Log Kp (skin permeation)?

Skin permeation: QSPR model implemented from
Potts RO and Guy RH. 1992 Pharm. Res.

-6.11 cm/s

Druglikeness

Lipinski?

Lipinski (Pfizer) filter: implemented from
Lipinski CA. et al. 2001 Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
MW ≤ 500
MLOGP ≤ 4.15
N or O ≤ 10
NH or OH ≤ 5

0.0
Ghose?

Ghose filter: implemented from
Ghose AK. et al. 1999 J. Comb. Chem.
160 ≤ MW ≤ 480
-0.4 ≤ WLOGP ≤ 5.6
40 ≤ MR ≤ 130
20 ≤ atoms ≤ 70

None
Veber?

Veber (GSK) filter: implemented from
Veber DF. et al. 2002 J. Med. Chem.
Rotatable bonds ≤ 10
TPSA ≤ 140

0.0
Egan?

Egan (Pharmacia) filter: implemented from
Egan WJ. et al. 2000 J. Med. Chem.
WLOGP ≤ 5.88
TPSA ≤ 131.6

0.0
Muegge?

Muegge (Bayer) filter: implemented from
Muegge I. et al. 2001 J. Med. Chem.
200 ≤ MW ≤ 600
-2 ≤ XLOGP ≤ 5
TPSA ≤ 150
Num. rings ≤ 7
Num. carbon > 4
Num. heteroatoms > 1
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 15
H-bond acc. ≤ 10
H-bond don. ≤ 5

2.0
Bioavailability Score?

Abbott Bioavailability Score: Probability of F > 10% in rat
implemented from
Martin YC. 2005 J. Med. Chem.

0.55

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS?

Pan Assay Interference Structures: implemented from
Baell JB. & Holloway GA. 2010 J. Med. Chem.

0.0 alert
Brenk?

Structural Alert: implemented from
Brenk R. et al. 2008 ChemMedChem

0.0 alert: heavy_metal
Leadlikeness?

Leadlikeness: implemented from
Teague SJ. 1999 Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
250 ≤ MW ≤ 350
XLOGP ≤ 3.5
Num. rotatable bonds ≤ 7

No; 1 violation:MW<1.0
Synthetic accessibility?

Synthetic accessibility score: from 1 (very easy) to 10 (very difficult)
based on 1024 fragmental contributions (FP2) modulated by size and complexity penaties,
trained on 12'782'590 molecules and tested on 40 external molecules (r2 = 0.94)

2.65
 

Historical Records

Technical Information

Categories

Related Functional Groups of
[ 14542-13-3 ]

Ethers

Chemical Structure| 15679-19-3

A746723 [15679-19-3]

2-Ethoxythiazole

Similarity: 0.89

Chemical Structure| 95453-59-1

A196112 [95453-59-1]

2-Methoxythiazole-5-carbaldehyde

Similarity: 0.71

Chemical Structure| 1640995-61-4

A127323 [1640995-61-4]

2-Ethoxy-5-(ethoxymethyl)thiazole

Similarity: 0.66

Chemical Structure| 105350-49-0

A196312 [105350-49-0]

4-(Thiazol-2-yloxy)aniline

Similarity: 0.57

Related Parent Nucleus of
[ 14542-13-3 ]

Thiazoles

Chemical Structure| 15679-19-3

A746723 [15679-19-3]

2-Ethoxythiazole

Similarity: 0.89

Chemical Structure| 82358-07-4

A219260 [82358-07-4]

2-Hydroxythiazole

Similarity: 0.85

Chemical Structure| 95453-59-1

A196112 [95453-59-1]

2-Methoxythiazole-5-carbaldehyde

Similarity: 0.71

Chemical Structure| 1640995-61-4

A127323 [1640995-61-4]

2-Ethoxy-5-(ethoxymethyl)thiazole

Similarity: 0.66

Chemical Structure| 1086381-71-6

A101954 [1086381-71-6]

4-Bromothiazol-2-ol

Similarity: 0.65