There will be a HazMat fee per item when shipping a dangerous goods. The HazMat fee will be charged to your UPS/DHL/FedEx collect account or added to the invoice unless the package is shipped via Ground service. Ship by air in Excepted Quantity (each bottle), which is up to 1g/1mL for class 6.1 packing group I or II, and up to 25g/25ml for all other HazMat items.
Type | HazMat fee for 500 gram (Estimated) |
Excepted Quantity | USD 0.00 |
Limited Quantity | USD 15-60 |
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), Domestic | USD 80+ |
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), International | USD 150+ |
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), Domestic | USD 100+ |
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), International | USD 200+ |
Purity | Size | Price | VIP Price | USA Stock *0-1 Day | Global Stock *5-7 Days | Quantity | |||||
{[ item.p_purity ]} | {[ item.pr_size ]} |
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1) ]} {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate) ]} |
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1) ]} | Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate) ]} {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,1,item.mem_rate) ]} | {[ item.pr_usastock ]} | Inquiry - | {[ item.pr_chinastock ]} | Inquiry - |
* Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
CAS No. : | 12270-13-2 | MDL No. : | MFCD00013334 |
Formula : | C20H26N4O6S2 | Boiling Point : | - |
Linear Structure Formula : | - | InChI Key : | MHOFGBJTSNWTDT-UHFFFAOYSA-M |
M.W : | 482.57 | Pubchem ID : | 83008 |
Synonyms : |
|
Num. heavy atoms : | 32 |
Num. arom. heavy atoms : | 15 |
Fraction Csp3 : | 0.35 |
Num. rotatable bonds : | 8 |
Num. H-bond acceptors : | 8.0 |
Num. H-bond donors : | 1.0 |
Molar Refractivity : | 124.2 |
TPSA : | 164.35 Ų |
GI absorption : | Low |
BBB permeant : | No |
P-gp substrate : | Yes |
CYP1A2 inhibitor : | No |
CYP2C19 inhibitor : | No |
CYP2C9 inhibitor : | No |
CYP2D6 inhibitor : | No |
CYP3A4 inhibitor : | No |
Log Kp (skin permeation) : | -6.72 cm/s |
Log Po/w (iLOGP) : | -3.07 |
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : | 3.55 |
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : | 4.14 |
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : | 1.84 |
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : | 4.32 |
Consensus Log Po/w : | 2.16 |
Lipinski : | 0.0 |
Ghose : | None |
Veber : | 1.0 |
Egan : | 1.0 |
Muegge : | 1.0 |
Bioavailability Score : | 0.55 |
Log S (ESOL) : | -4.89 |
Solubility : | 0.00626 mg/ml ; 0.000013 mol/l |
Class : | Moderately soluble |
Log S (Ali) : | -6.69 |
Solubility : | 0.0000994 mg/ml ; 0.000000206 mol/l |
Class : | Poorly soluble |
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : | -5.58 |
Solubility : | 0.00125 mg/ml ; 0.0000026 mol/l |
Class : | Moderately soluble |
PAINS : | 2.0 alert |
Brenk : | 4.0 alert |
Leadlikeness : | 3.0 |
Synthetic accessibility : | 3.88 |
Signal Word: | Danger | Class: | 8 |
Precautionary Statements: | P270-P273-P280-P301+P312-P338-P340-P351 | UN#: | 1759 |
Hazard Statements: | H302-H314-H373-H400 | Packing Group: | Ⅲ |
GHS Pictogram: |
* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
Azofarbstoff(13),Dimethylsulfat; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With ZnO/reduced graphene oxide composite In water at 25℃; for 0.666667h; Irradiation; | ||
With dihydrogen peroxide In water for 0.333333h; Irradiation; | ||
With activated carbon doped with TiO2 In water for 1h; UV-irradiation; | 2.2.1. Photocatalytic Degradation The photocatalytic degradation experiment was carried out in batch-wise mode usingsix 1 L reactors coupled with UV-T8 blacklight-blue bulb of wavelength 400 nm andpower of 18W, (Philips, Eindhoren, The Netherlands), under constant stirring at a speedof 150 rpm [24]. The reactor was placed in a closed chamber with the UV-light placed ata distance of less than 2 cm. To establish the photocatalytic kinetics, 3 g of each catalyst(TiO2 and AC-TiO2) was added to 500 mL dye solution. The irradiation time (10±60 min)was varied while the solution was constantly stirred. At each time interval of 10 min,supernatant samples were collected with a syringe and filtered through a Whatman filter(Grade 5; 2.5 m). The kinetics degradation efficiency was monitored in terms of the CODremoval, by using Equation (1). To estimate the rate of reaction constants for the first-orderkinetic model (2), a plot of ln CoC vs t was developed: Removal efficiency (%) = C0 - Cf/C0 x 100 (1) ln C0/C = k1t (2) where, k1 is the first-order rate constant (min1), C0 is the initial COD concentration, t is time and Cf is the concentration at the specified time. |