Home Cart 0 Sign in  

[ CAS No. 149647-78-9 ] {[proInfo.proName]}

,{[proInfo.pro_purity]}
Cat. No.: {[proInfo.prAm]}
Chemical Structure| 149647-78-9
Chemical Structure| 149647-78-9
Structure of 149647-78-9 * Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
Cart0 Add to My Favorites Add to My Favorites Bulk Inquiry Inquiry Add To Cart

Quality Control of [ 149647-78-9 ]

Related Doc. of [ 149647-78-9 ]

Alternatived Products of [ 149647-78-9 ]

Product Details of [ 149647-78-9 ]

CAS No. :149647-78-9 MDL No. :MFCD00945317
Formula : C14H20N2O3 Boiling Point : -
Linear Structure Formula :- InChI Key :WAEXFXRVDQXREF-UHFFFAOYSA-N
M.W : 264.32 Pubchem ID :5311
Synonyms :
SAHA;Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid;MK-0683, MK 0683, MK0683, SAHA, M344, CCRIS 8456, HSDB 7930, Vorinostat, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, Zolinza;MK0683
Chemical Name :N1-Hydroxy-N8-phenyloctanediamide

Calculated chemistry of [ 149647-78-9 ]

Physicochemical Properties

Num. heavy atoms : 19
Num. arom. heavy atoms : 6
Fraction Csp3 : 0.43
Num. rotatable bonds : 10
Num. H-bond acceptors : 3.0
Num. H-bond donors : 3.0
Molar Refractivity : 73.33
TPSA : 78.43 Ų

Pharmacokinetics

GI absorption : High
BBB permeant : No
P-gp substrate : No
CYP1A2 inhibitor : No
CYP2C19 inhibitor : No
CYP2C9 inhibitor : No
CYP2D6 inhibitor : No
CYP3A4 inhibitor : No
Log Kp (skin permeation) : -6.59 cm/s

Lipophilicity

Log Po/w (iLOGP) : 1.84
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : 1.86
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : 2.28
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : 1.83
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : 1.81
Consensus Log Po/w : 1.92

Druglikeness

Lipinski : 0.0
Ghose : None
Veber : 0.0
Egan : 0.0
Muegge : 0.0
Bioavailability Score : 0.55

Water Solubility

Log S (ESOL) : -2.22
Solubility : 1.58 mg/ml ; 0.00597 mol/l
Class : Soluble
Log S (Ali) : -3.13
Solubility : 0.197 mg/ml ; 0.000744 mol/l
Class : Soluble
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : -4.25
Solubility : 0.0147 mg/ml ; 0.0000557 mol/l
Class : Moderately soluble

Medicinal Chemistry

PAINS : 0.0 alert
Brenk : 2.0 alert
Leadlikeness : 1.0
Synthetic accessibility : 1.91

Safety of [ 149647-78-9 ]

Signal Word:Warning Class:N/A
Precautionary Statements:P280-P305+P351+P338 UN#:N/A
Hazard Statements:H302 Packing Group:N/A
GHS Pictogram:

Application In Synthesis of [ 149647-78-9 ]

* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.

  • Upstream synthesis route of [ 149647-78-9 ]
  • Downstream synthetic route of [ 149647-78-9 ]

[ 149647-78-9 ] Synthesis Path-Upstream   1~15

  • 1
  • [ 149648-52-2 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
75%
Stage #1: With 1,1'-carbonyldiimidazole In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 25 - 30℃; for 0.5 h;
Stage #2: With hydroxylamine hydrochloride In N,N-dimethyl-formamide for 0.5 h;
The suberanilic acid (leq) obtained in stage 1 was dissolved in DMF (5 vol) and CDI (2eq) was added at 25-3O0C and maintained for 30 minutes under stirring. Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (4eq) was added and stirring continued for 30 minutes. Water (25 vol) was then added and the mixture stirred for 2 hours. The precipitated solid was filtered, washed with water (2x5 vol) and dried under vacuum at 500C. Molar Yield = 70-75percent Purity by HPLC = 99percent
75%
Stage #1: With 1,1'-carbonyldiimidazole In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 25 - 30℃; for 0.5 h;
Stage #2: With hydroxylamine hydrochloride In N,N-dimethyl-formamide for 0.5 h;
The suberanilic acid (1 eq) obtained in stage 1 was dissolved in DMF (5 vol) and CDI (2 eq) was added at 25-30° C. and maintained for 30 minutes under stirring. Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (4 eq) was added and stirring continued for 30 minutes. Water (25 vol) was then added and the mixture stirred for 2 hours. The precipitated solid was filtered, washed with water (2.x.5 vol) and dried under vacuum at 50° C.Molar Yield=70-75percentPurity by HPLC=99percent
68%
Stage #1: With dmap; ethyl 2-(tert-butoxycarbonyloxyimino)-2-cyanoacetate; N-ethyl-N,N-diisopropylamine In tetrahydrofuran at 0 - 5℃; for 0.5 h;
Stage #2: With hydroxylamine hydrochloride In tetrahydrofuran; N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 20℃;
General procedure: Ethyl 2-(tert-butoxycarbonyloxyimino)-2-cyanoacetate(Boc-Oxyma,I)(1 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of suberic acid (2mmol) and DIPEA in DCM (2 mL) at 0-5 °C temperature. Then the reaction mixturewas stirred for 1 h followed by the addition of aniline (1 mmol). The progressof the reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reaction, thereaction mixture was acidified with 5percent HCl and extracted with dichloromethane(2×15 mL), and dried under anhydrous CaCl2 and the evaporation ofthe solvent gave a solid powder.Ethyl 2-(tert-butoxycarbonyloxyimino)-2-cyanoacetate(Boc-Oxyma, I)(1 mmol) was added to a stirred solution of previous carboxylic acid derivative(1 mmol), DIPEA (1 mmol) and DMAP (0.1 mmol) in THF (2 mL) at room temperature.Then the reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min followed by the addition ofhydroxylamine hydrochloride in DMF (0.5 mL), DIPEA (1.5 mmol). The progress ofthe reaction was monitored by TLC at room temperature. After completion of thereaction, the reaction mixture was concentrated using rotary evaporator andthen diluted with 15 mL of ethyl acetate and washed with 5percent HCl (2×10 mL), 5percentNaHCO3 (2×10 mL), saturated NaCl solution (2×10 mL) and dried overanhydrous Na2SO4 and the evaporationof the solvent gave a residue that was purified on silica gel columnchromatography using hexane and ethyl acetate.
Reference: [1] Nature Chemistry, 2017, vol. 9, # 6, p. 571 - 577
[2] Patent: WO2010/43904, 2010, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 18
[3] Patent: US2011/263712, 2011, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 7
[4] Tetrahedron Letters, 2015, vol. 56, # 44, p. 6108 - 6111
[5] ChemSusChem, 2017, vol. 10, # 9, p. 1969 - 1975
[6] Organic Preparations and Procedures International, 2001, vol. 33, # 4, p. 391 - 394
[7] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2016, vol. 22, # 20, p. 6964 - 6967
[8] Patent: CN106008267, 2016, A, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0053 - 0056
[9] ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2018, vol. 9, # 7, p. 635 - 640
[10] ChemMedChem, 2018, vol. 13, # 19, p. 2073 - 2079
[11] Patent: WO2005/23179, 2005, A2,
  • 2
  • [ 149647-86-9 ]
  • [ 62-53-3 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
82.4% With dicyclohexyl-carbodiimide; potassium hydroxide In ethanol at 50℃; for 0.5 h; 3.8 g (20 mmol) of N-hydroxy-7-carboxy-heptanoamide was dissolved in 20 ml of absolute ethanol and then 1,3-dicyclohexyl(100 mmol) of potassium hydroxide, heated to 50 ° C and stirred for 30 min under heat. After completion of the reaction, the reaction solution was concentrated and poured into water, Filtered, washed with water, and dried in vacuum to give 4 · 4g of fuloxitopine, with a yield of 82.4percent and a purity of 99.52percent.
Reference: [1] Patent: CN106008267, 2016, A, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0047; 0048
[2] Patent: US2011/263712, 2011, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 7
  • 3
  • [ 162853-41-0 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
YieldReaction ConditionsOperation in experiment
95.6%
Stage #1: With hydroxylamine hydrochloride; sodium methylate In methanol; water for 16.1667 h;
Stage #2: With water; acetic acid In methanol for 0.166667 h;
To a 50 L flask with a mechanical stirrer, thermocouple, and inlet for inert atmosphere was added 1,451.9 g of hydroxylamine hydrochloride, 19 L of anhydrous methanol, and a 3.93 L of a 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol. The flask was then charged with 2,748.0 g of methyl suberanilate, followed by 1.9 L of a 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol. The mixture was allowed to stir for 16 hr and 10 minutes. Approximately one half of the reaction mixture was transferred from the reaction flask (flask 1) to a 50 L flask (flask 2) fitted with a mechanical stirrer. Then 27 L of deionized water was added to flask 1 and the mixture was stirrer for 10 minutes. The pH was taken using a pH meter; the pH was 11.56. The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 12.02 by the addition of 100 ml of the 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol; this gave a clear solution (the reaction mixture at this time contained a small amount of solid. The pH was adjusted to give a clear solution from which the precipitation the product would be precipitated). The reaction mixture in flask 2 was diluted in the same manner; 27 L of deionized water was added, and the pH adjusted by the addition of 100 ml of a 30percent sodium methoxide solution to the mixture, to give a pH of 12.01 (clear solution). The reaction mixture in each flask was acidified by the addition of glacial acetic acid to precipitate the product. Flask 1 had a final pH of 8.98, and Flask 2 had a final pH of 8.70. The product from both flasks was isolated by filtration using a Buchner funnel and filter cloth. The filter cake was washed with 15 L of deionized water, and the funnel was covered and the product was partially dried on the funnel under vacuum for 15.5 hr. The product was removed and placed into five glass trays. The trays were placed in a vacuum oven and the product was dried to constant weight. The first drying period was for 22 hours at 60° C. using a Nash pump as the vacuum source with an argon bleed. The trays were removed from the vacuum oven and weighed. The trays were returned to the oven and the product dried for an additional 4 hr and 10 minutes using an oil pump as the vacuum source and with no argon bleed. The material was packaged in double 4-mill polyethylene bags, and placed in a plastic outer container. The final weight after sampling was 2633.4 g (95.6percent).
95.6% With hydroxylamine hydrochloride; sodium methylate In methanol for 16.1667 h; To a 50 L flask with a mechanical stirrer, thermocouple, and inlet for inert atmosphere was added 1,451.9 g of hydroxylamine hydrochloride, 19 L of anhydrous methanol, and a 3.93 L of a 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol. The flask was then charged with 2,748.0 g of methyl suberanilate, followed by 1.9 L of a 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol. The mixture was allowed to stir for 16 hr and 10 minutes. Approximately one half of the reaction mixture was transferred from the reaction flask (flask 1) to a 50 L flask (flask 2) fitted with a mechanical stirrer. Then 27 L of deionized water was added to flask 1 and the mixture was <n="63"/>stirrer for 10 minutes. The pH was taken using a pH meter; the pH was 11.56. The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 12.02 by the addition of 100 ml of the 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol; this gave a clear solution (the reaction mixture at this time contained a small amount of solid. The pH was adjusted to give a clear solution from which the precipitation the product would be precipitated). The reaction mixture in flask 2 was diluted in the same manner; 27 L of deionized water was added, and the pH adjusted by the addition of 100 ml of a 30 percent sodium methoxide solution to the mixture, to give a pH of 12.01 (clear solution).The reaction mixture in each flask was acidified by the addition of glacial acetic acid to precipitate the product. Flask 1 had a final pH of 8.98, and Flask 2 had a final pH of 8.70. The product from both flasks was isolated by filtration using a Buchner funnel and filter cloth. The filter cake was washed with 15 L of deionized water, and the funnel was covered and the product was partially dried on the funnel under vacuum for 15.5 hr. The product was removed and placed into five glass trays. The trays were placed in a vacuum oven and the product was dried to constant weight. The first drying period was for 22 hours at 6O0C using a Nash pump as the vacuum source with an argon bleed. The trays were removed from the vacuum oven and weighed. The trays were returned to the oven and the product dried for an additional 4 hr and 10 minutes using an oil pump as the vacuum source and with no argon bleed. The material was packaged in double 4-mill polyethylene bags, and placed in a plastic outer container. The final weight after sampling was 2633.4 g (95.6percent).
95.6%
Stage #1: With hydroxylamine hydrochloride; sodium methylate In methanol for 16.3333 h;
Stage #2: With sodium methylate In methanol; water for 0.166667 h;
Stage #3: With acetic acid In methanol; water
To a 50 L flask with a mechanical stirrer, thermocouple, and inlet for inert atmosphere was added 1,451.9 g of hydroxylamine hydrochloride, 19 L of anhydrous methanol, and a 3.93 L of a 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol. The flask was then charged with 2,748.0 g of methyl suberanilate, followed by 1.9 L of a 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol. The mixture was allowed to stir for 16 hr and 10 minutes. Approximately one half of the reaction mixture was transferred from the reaction flask (flask 1) to a 50 L flask (flask 2) fitted with a mechanical stirrer. Then 27 L of deionized water was added to flask 1 and the mixture was stirred for 10 minutes. The pH was taken using a pH meter; the pH was 11.56. The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 12.02 by the addition of 100 ml of the 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol; this gave a clear solution (the reaction mixture at this time contained a small amount of solid. The pH was adjusted to give a clear solution from which the precipitation the product would be precipitated). The reaction mixture in flask 2 was diluted in the same manner; 27 L of deionized water was added, and the pH adjusted by the addition of 100 ml of a 30percent sodium methoxide solution to the mixture, to give a pH of 12.01 (clear solution).The reaction mixture in each flask was acidified by the addition of glacial acetic acid to precipitate the product. Flask 1 had a final pH of 8.98, and Flask 2 had a final pH of 8.70. The product from both flasks was isolated by filtration using a Buchner funnel and filter cloth. The filter cake was washed with 15 L of deionized water, and the funnel was covered and the product was partially dried on the funnel under vacuum for 15.5 hr. The product was removed and placed into five glass trays. The trays were placed in a vacuum oven and the product was dried to constant weight. The first drying period was for 22 hours at 60° C. using a Nash pump as the vacuum source with an argon bleed. The trays were removed from the vacuum oven and weighed. The trays were returned to the oven and the product dried for an additional 4 hr and 10 minutes using an oil pump as the vacuum source and with no argon bleed. The material was packaged in double 4-mill polyethylene bags, and placed in a plastic outer container. The final weight after sampling was 2633.4 g (95.6percent).
95.6% With hydroxylamine hydrochloride; sodium methylate In methanol To a 50 L flask with a mechanical stirrer, thermocouple, and inlet for inert atmosphere was added 1,451. 9 g of hydroxylamine hydrochloride, 19 L of anhydrous methanol, and a 3.93 L of a 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol. The flask was then charged with 2,748. 0 g of methyl suberanilate, followed by 1.9 L of a 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol. The mixture was allowed to stir for 16 hr and 10 minutes. Approximately one half of the reaction mixture was transferred from the reaction flask (flask 1) to a 50 L flask (flask 2) fitted with a mechanical stirrer. Then 27 L of deionized water was added to flask 1 and the mixture was stirrer for 10 minutes. The pH was taken using a pH meter; the pH was 11.56. The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 12.02 by the addition of 100 ml of the 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol; this gave a clear solution (the reaction mixture at this time contained a small amount of solid. The pH was adjusted to give a clear solution from which the precipitation the product would be precipitated). The reaction mixture in flask 2 was diluted in the same manner; 27 L of deionized water was added, and the pH adjusted by the addition of 100 ml of a 30 percent sodium methoxide solution to the mixture, to give a pH of 12.01 (clear solution). The reaction mixture in each flask was acidified by the addition of glacial acetic acid to precipitate the product. Flask 1 had a final pH of 8.98, and Flask 2 had a final pH of 8.70. The product from both flasks was isolated by filtration using a Buchner funnel and filter cloth. The filter cake was washed with 15 L of deionized water, and the funnel was covered and the product was partially dried on the funnel under vacuum for 15. 5 hr. The product was removed and placed into five glass trays. The trays were placed in a vacuum oven and the product was dried to constant weight. The first drying period was for 22 hours at 60°C using a Nash pump as the vacuum source with an argon bleed. The trays were removed from the vacuum oven and weighed. The trays were returned to the oven and the product dried for an additional 4 hr and 10 minutes using an oil pump as the vacuum source and with no argon bleed. The material was packaged in double 4-mill polyethylene bags, and placed in a plastic outer container. The final weight after sampling was 2633.4 g (95.6percent).
95% With hydroxylamine hydrochloride; sodium hydroxide In methanol at 50℃; for 0.5 h; Green chemistry A. 3.96 g of hydroxylamine hydrochloride was dissolved in a single-necked flask with 40 mL of methanol, and the flask was placed on a thermostatically heated thermostat. Magnetic stirrer, heated to 50 ° C; B, 3.80 g of sodium hydroxide was added to a solution of hydroxylamine hydrochloride in methanol, mixed for 5 minutes, maintaining a reaction environment of pH=9; C, adding 5g (0.019mol) methyl 7-(anilinoformyl)heptanoate; D. After 30 minutes of reaction, the solvent was removed by rotary evaporation and the residue was thoroughly mixed with 120 mL of 5 mol/L diluted hydrochloric acid. With suction filtration, multiple washings and vacuum drying of white solids, high-purity vorinostat is obtained without the need for subsequent recrystallization treatment. Vorinostat was obtained by the above method with a yield of 95.0percent and a purity of 99.0percent.
95.6% With hydroxylamine hydrochloride; sodium methylate In methanol To a 50 L flask with a mechanical stirrer, thermocouple, and inlet for inert atmosphere was added 1,451. 9 g of hydroxylamine hydrochloride, 19 L of anhydrous methanol, and a 3.93 L of a 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol. The flask was then charged with 2,748. 0 g of methyl suberanilate, followed by 1.9 L of a 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol. The mixture was allowed to stir for 16 hr and 10 minutes. Approximately one half of the reaction mixture was transferred from the reaction flask (flask 1) to a 50 L flask (flask 2) fitted with a mechanical stirrer. Then 27 L of deionized water was added to flask 1 and the mixture was stirrer for 10 minutes. The pH was taken using a pH meter; the pH was 11.56. The pH of the mixture was adjusted to 12.02 by the addition of 100 ml of the 30percent sodium methoxide solution in methanol; this gave a clear solution (the reaction mixture at this time contained a small amount of solid. The pH was adjusted to give a clear solution from which the precipitation the product would be precipitated). The reaction mixture in flask 2 was diluted in the same manner; 27 L of deionized water was added, and the pH adjusted by the addition of 100 ml of a 30 percent sodium methoxide solution to the mixture, to give a pH of 12.01 (clear solution). The reaction mixture in each flask was acidified by the addition of glacial acetic acid to precipitate the product. Flask 1 had a final pH of 8.98, and Flask 2 had a final pH of 8.70. The product from both flasks was isolated by filtration using a Buchner funnel and filter cloth. The filter cake was washed with 15 L of deionized water, and the funnel was covered and the product was partially dried on the funnel under vacuum for 15. 5 hr. The product was removed and placed into five glass trays. The trays were placed in a vacuum oven and the product was dried to constant weight. The first drying period was for 22 hours at 60°C using a Nash pump as the vacuum source with an argon bleed. The trays were removed from the vacuum oven and weighed. The trays were returned to the oven and the product dried for an additional 4 hr and 10 minutes using an oil pump as the vacuum source and with no argon bleed. The material was packaged in double 4-mill polyethylene bags, and placed in a plastic outer container. The final weight after sampling was 2633.4 g (95.6percent).
92.1% With hydroxylamine hydrochloride; sodium methylate In methanol at 40℃; for 3 h; 3) Hydroxylamine hydrochloride 6.5g (100mmol) of sodium methoxide and 6.5g (120mmol) was stirred in anhydrous methanol reaction 0.5h, filtered and the suberanilic acid methyl ester was added to the filtrate, the reaction deg.] C 40 3 hours, cooled to room temperature, adjusted pH = 7, filtered off with suction, the filter cake was washed with water, and recrystallized from ethanol to give 21.7 g of vorinostat, yield 92.1percent, purity 99.87percent.
90% With hydroxylamine; potassium hydroxide In methanol at 20℃; for 1.5 h; Step (b): Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (5.84 g, 0.084 mol) in methanol (15 mL) was mixed with KOH (4.70 g, 0.084 mol) at 40 °C in methanol (25 mL), cooled to 0 °C, and filtered. The suberanilic acid methyl ester (1.2 g, 0.004 mol) was then added to the filtrate followed by addition (over 30 min) of KOH (380 mg, 0.06 mol). The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 1 h. The mixture was added to stirring cold water (150 mL), and the pH was adjusted to seven by adding acetic acid. The precipitate was filtered off, and the resulting product was dried in a vacuum oven at 40 °C overnight to yield 1.05 g (yield 90.0 percent) of SAHA [2]: mp 158–161 °C.
48.6% With hydroxylamine hydrochloride; potassium hydroxide In methanol at 20 - 40℃; for 0.5 h; Inert atmosphere (B) To a 100-mL beaker equipped with a Teflon-coatedmagnetic stirring bar were sequentially placed potassiumhydroxide (5.05g, 90 mmol) and methanol (20mL). The mixturewas stirred until a complete dissolution was obtained.Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (6.95g, 100 mmol) was added. After an additional 30 min of stirring at 40oC, the reactionmixture was cooled to ambient temperature. Methyl 8-(phenyl amino)-8-oxooctanoate (1.32g, 5mmol, obtainedfrom the part A) was added. Stirring was continued for 30min. TLC was employed to monitor the progress of the reaction.After the complete reaction, the reaction mixture waspoured into 600mL of ice-water mixture with vigorous stirringleading to the formation of a solid. The resulting solidwas collected by vacuum filtration, and successively washedwith water (2 X 10mL) and ether (2 X 10mL). After havingbeen dried in vacuo, the crude product was further purifiedby recrystallization from acetonitrile to afford N-hydroxy-N'-phenyloctane-diamide as a white solid (0.64 g, 48.6percent);HPLC Rt=14.26min; mp: 159-161oC; 1HNMR (400 MHz,DMSO-d6): = 10.32(s,1H), 9.83(s,1H), 8.64(s,1H), 7.58(d,J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.27(t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.01(t, J=7.2 Hz, 1H),2.28(t, J=7.2Hz, 2H), 1.93(t, J=7.1Hz, 2H), 1.53(m, 4H),1.28ppm (m, 4H); 13C NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):=25.00, 28.38, 32.22, 36.35, 119.01, 122.87, 128.58,139.31, 169.11, 171.20ppm. C14H20N2O3, MS (ES+) m/z:265.1560 [M+H]+.
48.6% With hydroxylamine hydrochloride; potassium hydroxide In methanol at 40℃; for 1 h; Green chemistry (A) To an oven-dried, 100-mL, three-necked, round bottomed flask equipped with a thermometer, a vacuum jacketed Dean-Stark trap topped with a reflux condenser fitted with a T-joint inlet, glass stoppers, and a Teflon-coated magnetic stirring bar was sequentially charged with 8-methoxy-8-oxooctanoic acid (3.76g, 20 mmol, 1 equiv),30mL of toluene, and boric acid (0.62g, 10 mmol, 0.5 equiv).While stirring vigorously under nitrogen, aniline (1.86g, 20mmol, 1 equiv) was added in one portion. The reaction was heated at reflux for 10h in an oil bath. TLC analysis, using ether: petroleum ether (2:1) as the eluent, indicated the complete reaction. The reaction mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature and then poured into 300mL of hexane with vigorous stirring leading to the precipitation of a solid.Stirring was continued for an additional 30min, and the resultingsolid was then filtered off with suction through a sintered glass filter funnel. After having been successively washed with water and hexane, the collected solid was further dried in vacuo at ambient temperature for 12h to afford methyl 8-(phenyl amino)-8-oxooctanoate as a white solid(3.82g, 72.5percent). (B) To a 100-mL beaker equipped with a Teflon-coated magnetic stirring bar were sequentially placed potassium hydroxide (5.05g, 90 mmol) and methanol (20mL). The mixture was stirred until a complete dissolution was obtained. Hydroxylamine hydrochloride (6.95g, 100 mmol) was added. After an additional 30 min of stirring at 40oC, the reaction mixture was cooled to ambient temperature. Methyl 8-(phenylamino)-8-oxooctanoate (1.32g, 5mmol, obtained from the part A) was added. Stirring was continued for 30 min. TLC was employed to monitor the progress of the reaction. After the complete reaction, the reaction mixture was poured into 600mL of ice-water mixture with vigorous stirring leading to the formation of a solid. The resulting solid was collected by vacuum filtration, and successively washed with water (2 X 10mL) and ether (2 X 10mL). After having been dried in vacuo, the crude product was further purified by recrystallization from acetonitrile to afford N-hydroxy-N'-phenyloctane-diamide as a white solid (0.64 g, 48.6percent);HPLC Rt=14.26min; mp: 159-161oC; 1HNMR (400 MHz,[D6]DMSO): = 10.32(s,1H), 9.83(s,1H), 8.64(s,1H), 7.58(d,J=7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.27(t, J=7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.01(t, J=7.2 Hz, 1H),2.28(t, J=7.2Hz, 2H), 1.93(t, J=7.1Hz, 2H), 1.53(m, 4H),1.28ppm (m, 4H); 13C NMR (400 MHz [D6]DMSO):=25.00, 28.38, 32.22, 36.35, 119.01, 122.87, 128.58,139.31, 169.11, 171.20ppm. C14H20N2O3, MS (ES+) m/z:265.1560 [M+H]+.

Reference: [1] Patent: US2007/117815, 2007, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 29
[2] Patent: WO2007/56244, 2007, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 60-61
[3] Patent: US2008/132575, 2008, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 14
[4] Patent: WO2005/23179, 2005, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 84-85
[5] Patent: CN108069878, 2018, A, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0011; 0032; 0058-0064; 0067; 0074; 0081; 0087
[6] Patent: WO2005/23179, 2005, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 84-85
[7] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2010, vol. 53, # 8, p. 3038 - 3047
[8] Patent: CN105777582, 2016, A, . Location in patent: Paragraph 0023; 0027
[9] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 1995, vol. 38, # 8, p. 1411 - 1413
[10] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2005, vol. 48, # 15, p. 5047 - 5051
[11] Journal of Natural Products, 2013, vol. 76, # 7, p. 1260 - 1266
[12] Apoptosis, 2016, vol. 21, # 11, p. 1249 - 1264
[13] ChemMedChem, 2018, vol. 13, # 19, p. 2073 - 2079
[14] Angewandte Chemie - International Edition, 2007, vol. 46, # 42, p. 7960 - 7964
[15] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2013, vol. 56, # 20, p. 7997 - 8007
[16] Medicinal Chemistry, 2015, vol. 11, # 7, p. 636 - 648
[17] Medicinal Chemistry, 2016, vol. 12, # 8, p. 767 - 774
[18] Patent: WO2008/39421, 2008, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 33-34
[19] Patent: US2008/132575, 2008, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 15
[20] Patent: WO2010/62333, 2010, A1, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 10
[21] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2011, vol. 54, # 13, p. 4694 - 4720
[22] Journal of Drug Targeting, 2018, vol. 26, # 5-6, p. 448 - 457
[23] ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2018, vol. 9, # 7, p. 635 - 640
  • 4
  • [ 505-48-6 ]
  • [ 62-53-3 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
Reference: [1] Patent: WO2010/43904, 2010, A2, . Location in patent: Page/Page column 19
[2] Patent: US2011/263712, 2011, A1,
[3] Tetrahedron Letters, 2015, vol. 56, # 44, p. 6108 - 6111
  • 5
  • [ 162853-41-0 ]
  • [ 149648-52-2 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2009, vol. 74, # 9, p. 3540 - 3543
  • 6
  • [ 3946-32-5 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2005, vol. 48, # 15, p. 5047 - 5051
[2] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2011, vol. 54, # 13, p. 4694 - 4720
[3] Journal of Drug Targeting, 2018, vol. 26, # 5-6, p. 448 - 457
[4] ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2018, vol. 9, # 7, p. 635 - 640
  • 7
  • [ 62-53-3 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
Reference: [1] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2016, vol. 22, # 20, p. 6964 - 6967
[2] Patent: CN105777582, 2016, A,
[3] ChemSusChem, 2017, vol. 10, # 9, p. 1969 - 1975
[4] Journal of Drug Targeting, 2018, vol. 26, # 5-6, p. 448 - 457
[5] ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2018, vol. 9, # 7, p. 635 - 640
[6] ChemMedChem, 2018, vol. 13, # 19, p. 2073 - 2079
[7] Patent: WO2005/23179, 2005, A2,
  • 8
  • [ 505-48-6 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Preparations and Procedures International, 2001, vol. 33, # 4, p. 391 - 394
[2] Chemistry - A European Journal, 2016, vol. 22, # 20, p. 6964 - 6967
[3] ChemMedChem, 2018, vol. 13, # 19, p. 2073 - 2079
[4] Patent: WO2005/23179, 2005, A2,
  • 9
  • [ 3946-32-5 ]
  • [ 62-53-3 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
Reference: [1] Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 2013, vol. 56, # 20, p. 7997 - 8007
[2] Medicinal Chemistry, 2015, vol. 11, # 7, p. 636 - 648
[3] Apoptosis, 2016, vol. 21, # 11, p. 1249 - 1264
[4] Medicinal Chemistry, 2016, vol. 12, # 8, p. 767 - 774
  • 10
  • [ 10521-06-9 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
Reference: [1] Organic Preparations and Procedures International, 2001, vol. 33, # 4, p. 391 - 394
[2] Patent: CN105777582, 2016, A,
  • 11
  • [ 62-53-3 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
Reference: [1] ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2018, vol. 9, # 7, p. 635 - 640
  • 12
  • [ 3946-32-5 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
Reference: [1] ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2018, vol. 9, # 7, p. 635 - 640
  • 13
  • [ 162853-41-0 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
Reference: [1] ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2018, vol. 9, # 7, p. 635 - 640
  • 14
  • [ 149648-52-2 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
Reference: [1] ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2018, vol. 9, # 7, p. 635 - 640
  • 15
  • [ 5698-29-3 ]
  • [ 149647-78-9 ]
Reference: [1] ChemSusChem, 2017, vol. 10, # 9, p. 1969 - 1975
Same Skeleton Products
Historical Records