There will be a HazMat fee per item when shipping a dangerous goods. The HazMat fee will be charged to your UPS/DHL/FedEx collect account or added to the invoice unless the package is shipped via Ground service. Ship by air in Excepted Quantity (each bottle), which is up to 1g/1mL for class 6.1 packing group I or II, and up to 25g/25ml for all other HazMat items.
Type | HazMat fee for 500 gram (Estimated) |
Excepted Quantity | USD 0.00 |
Limited Quantity | USD 15-60 |
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), Domestic | USD 80+ |
Inaccessible (Haz class 6.1), International | USD 150+ |
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), Domestic | USD 100+ |
Accessible (Haz class 3, 4, 5 or 8), International | USD 200+ |
Purity | Size | Price | VIP Price | USA Stock *0-1 Day | Global Stock *5-7 Days | Quantity | |||||
{[ item.p_purity ]} | {[ item.pr_size ]} |
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1) ]} {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate) ]} |
{[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd, 1,1) ]} | Inquiry {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,item.pr_rate,item.mem_rate) ]} {[ getRatePrice(item.pr_usd,1,item.mem_rate) ]} | {[ item.pr_usastock ]} | Inquiry - | {[ item.pr_chinastock ]} | Inquiry - |
* Storage: {[proInfo.prStorage]}
CAS No. : | 120-61-6 | MDL No. : | MFCD00008440 |
Formula : | C10H10O4 | Boiling Point : | - |
Linear Structure Formula : | - | InChI Key : | WOZVHXUHUFLZGK-UHFFFAOYSA-N |
M.W : | 194.18 | Pubchem ID : | 8441 |
Synonyms : |
|
Num. heavy atoms : | 14 |
Num. arom. heavy atoms : | 6 |
Fraction Csp3 : | 0.2 |
Num. rotatable bonds : | 4 |
Num. H-bond acceptors : | 4.0 |
Num. H-bond donors : | 0.0 |
Molar Refractivity : | 49.0 |
TPSA : | 52.6 Ų |
GI absorption : | High |
BBB permeant : | Yes |
P-gp substrate : | No |
CYP1A2 inhibitor : | Yes |
CYP2C19 inhibitor : | No |
CYP2C9 inhibitor : | No |
CYP2D6 inhibitor : | No |
CYP3A4 inhibitor : | No |
Log Kp (skin permeation) : | -5.89 cm/s |
Log Po/w (iLOGP) : | 2.34 |
Log Po/w (XLOGP3) : | 2.25 |
Log Po/w (WLOGP) : | 1.26 |
Log Po/w (MLOGP) : | 1.82 |
Log Po/w (SILICOS-IT) : | 1.61 |
Consensus Log Po/w : | 1.86 |
Lipinski : | 0.0 |
Ghose : | None |
Veber : | 0.0 |
Egan : | 0.0 |
Muegge : | 1.0 |
Bioavailability Score : | 0.55 |
Log S (ESOL) : | -2.51 |
Solubility : | 0.594 mg/ml ; 0.00306 mol/l |
Class : | Soluble |
Log S (Ali) : | -2.99 |
Solubility : | 0.198 mg/ml ; 0.00102 mol/l |
Class : | Soluble |
Log S (SILICOS-IT) : | -2.55 |
Solubility : | 0.542 mg/ml ; 0.00279 mol/l |
Class : | Soluble |
PAINS : | 0.0 alert |
Brenk : | 1.0 alert |
Leadlikeness : | 1.0 |
Synthetic accessibility : | 1.16 |
Signal Word: | Danger | Class: | N/A |
Precautionary Statements: | P501-P273-P260-P270-P271-P264-P312-P337+P313-P305+P351+P338-P332+P313-P304+P340+P312-P403+P233-P405 | UN#: | N/A |
Hazard Statements: | H303-H316-H320-H372-H335-H401 | Packing Group: | N/A |
GHS Pictogram: |
* All experimental methods are cited from the reference, please refer to the original source for details. We do not guarantee the accuracy of the content in the reference.
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
73% | Stage #1: With potassium hydroxide In methanol; toluene at 65℃; for 3 h; Stage #2: With thionyl chloride In toluene at 67℃; for 3 h; Inert atmosphere |
This example demonstrates the preparation of 4-chlorocarbonyl- benzoic acid methyl ester having the following structure. In a 4 L kettle with mechanical stirrer, reflux condenser, addition funnel, thermometer, water bath and hot plate, 438 g dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) and 2700 mL toluene were added. The kettle was heated to about 65 00 to dissolve all the DMT. After dissolution, a potassium hydroxide solution (144.54 g in 700 mL methanol) was added dropwise over 45 minutes. The reaction was stirred at 65 00 for three hours and then the reaction cooled to room temperature overnight. The solid was collected after filtration and washed with 3750 mL toluene at 80 00. The product was filtered again and dried in the oven at 110 00. The yield was 465.9 g(95.3percent).In a 2 Lthree neck round bottom flask with mechanical stirrer, addition funnel, water bath, thermometer, nitrogen sweep, and hot plate, 130.31 g of the product made in previous step and 1000 mL toluene were added. Then 48 mL of thionyl chloride was added dropwise. After the completion of addition, the mixture was heated to 67 00 for three hours. The reaction cooled to room temperature and was stirred overnight. The contents were filtered to collect the filtrate. The excess solvent was removed by vacuum and 86.52 g of product was obtained (73percent yield). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
95% | at 10 - 20℃; for 1 h; | In a 1000 ml four-necked flask, 926.97 g of 98percent sulfuric acid was introduced, Stirring down to 10~15°C ,Slowly add 97.7percent nitric acid 200.72g; Plus complete, keep 10~15 °C by adding dimethyl terephthalate 300.0g, about 30min plus, The reaction temperature was controlled at 15~20°C , After incubation for 30 minutes, The end point of the reaction was confirmed by TLC.After stirring for 15 minutes, the filter cake was rinsed with 900 ml of 5percent aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide and then rinsed with 500 ml of water to neutral. The filter cake was put into 3000 ml of water, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 minutes. Four bottles, add 1500g of ethanol for recrystallization: first heated to 50 ~ 55 , so that all the dissolved solids, and then cooled to 5 ° C below the full precipitation of the material; filtration, filter drying, the influx of goods 382.5g, 60°C dried in vacuo to obtain 351.2 g of white crystals in 95percent yield (as dimethyl dimethyl terephthalate), a gas chromatographic content of> 99percent, a melting point of 73.8 to 75.5 ° C (reported melting point: 73 to 76 ° C) . |
82.9% | at 20℃; for 1 h; Cooling | nitration reaction: electromagnetic stirring dimethyl terephthalic acid (compound I) 10g is dissolved in 50 ml concentrated sulfuric acid, ice-bath cooling, will 5 ml fuming nitric acid slowly dropping to the reaction flask, does not exceed the temperature is maintained during 20 °C; of after-reaction of adding 1h, TLC (thin layer chromatography) monitoring the consumption of raw materials, the reaction liquid stirring slowly poured into 100 ml ice water, separating white solid, filtering, the filter cake is washed with saturated NaHCO3pH8 to, drying shall 10.2g white solid, that is, 2-nitro-terephthalic acid dimethyl ester (compound II), as shown in Figure 1, the yield 82.9percent |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
100% | Stage #1: methanol; terephthalic acid for 0.5h; Reflux; Inert atmosphere; Stage #2: With thionyl chloride for 10h; Reflux; Inert atmosphere; | |
99% | With thionyl chloride Heating; | |
99% | Stage #1: methanol; terephthalic acid for 0.5h; Reflux; Stage #2: With thionyl chloride for 12h; Reflux; |
98% | With thionyl chloride at 20℃; for 17h; | Dimethyl Terephthalate (32) To a solution of terephthalic acid (31, 6.0 g, 36.0 mmol) in methanol (150 mL),thionyl chloride (7.7 mL, 108 mmol) was added dropwise at 0 C. The mixture was stirred at roomtemperature for 17 h and then saturated potassium carbonate solution was added until no bubbleswere generated. The methanol was removed by distillation. After adding water (40 mL), the mixturewas partitioned between water and ether. The organic layer was washed with a saturated aqueoussolution of NaHCO3 and brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated under vacuum togive 32 (6.84 g, 98%) as a white solid. m.p. 141~143°C (ether); ESI-MS: m/z [M + H]+ 195. |
95% | With sulfuric acid for 24h; Reflux; | 3 To a solution, of the bio-based terephthalic acid (632 mmol, 105 g) (obtained in Example 1) in methanol (6320 mmol, 2086 ml) was added concentrated H2SO4 (31.6 mmol, 3.23 ml) and the mixture was stirred for 1 day at reflux. After cooling down the solution, the solvent was removed and the resulting solid was dissolved in dichloro methane (DCM) (400 ml). The solution was washed with water (200 ml or until pH of solution is neutral), then the organic layer was dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated using a rotary evaporator to obtain the crude product, a solid. The solid was purified washing it with a small amount of cold methanol and dried at 90° C., for 12 h. The yield that was obtained was 95% (117 g). |
94% | With 4-methyl-morpholine; 4-(4,6-Dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methylmorpholin-4-ium chloride for 4h; | |
94% | With sulfuric acid for 48h; Reflux; | Dimethyl terephtalate (Ia) A suspension of TPA (5.0 g, 30.1 mmol)in 100 mL of MeOH and 8 mL of H2SO4 was refluxed for 2 days andduring this time the suspension dissolved. Reduction of the MeOH volumeby a rotary evaporator resulted in the precipitation of a product,which was neutralized by KHCO3 in 200 mL of an ice-water mixture.Product Ia was filtrated and washed with water. |
94% | With sulfuric acid for 48h; Reflux; | Dimethyl terephtalate (Ia) A suspension of TPA (5.0 g, 30.1 mmol)in 100 mL of MeOH and 8 mL of H2SO4 was refluxed for 2 days andduring this time the suspension dissolved. Reduction of the MeOH volumeby a rotary evaporator resulted in the precipitation of a product,which was neutralized by KHCO3 in 200 mL of an ice-water mixture.Product Ia was filtrated and washed with water. White solid. Yield 94 %. EA (calc.) for C10H10O4 (194.18): C,61.85; H, 5.19 %; found: C, 61.84; H, 5.22 %. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3,298 K, ppm): δ 8.09 (s, 4H), 3.94 (s, 6H). |
93% | With sulfuric acid for 4h; Reflux; | |
93% | With sulfuric acid for 4h; Reflux; | |
85.6% | With sulfuric acid for 4h; Reflux; | |
85% | Stage #1: methanol; terephthalic acid With sulfuric acid for 4h; Reflux; Stage #2: With 5,5’-(1,4-phenylene)-bis-1,3,4-oxadiazole In dichloromethane; water monomer Reflux; | 1 Synthesis of dimethyl terephthalate Terephthalic acid (10g, 0.06 mol), methanol (110 mL) and cone H2SO4 (2.7 mL) were heated under reflux for 4 h (Datoussaida, Y.; Othmana, A. A.; Kirsch, G. Synthesis and Antibacterial Activity of some 5,5’-(l,4-phenylene)-bis-l,3,4- Oxadiazole and bis-1, 2, 4-Triazole Derivatives as Precursors of New S-Nucleosides. S. Afr. J. Chem. 2012, 65, 30-35). Once the reaction complete, dichloromethane (100 mL) and water (100 mL) were added to the mixture. After separation, the organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated to afford a white solid (85%). [0231] Dimethyl terephthalate: 1H NMR (500 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ = 8.10 (s, 3H), 3.95 (s, OH), 3.94 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (126 MHz, Chloroform-d) δ = 166.43, 133.99, 129.66, 52.56. |
82% | With thionyl chloride at 25 - 80℃; for 12.16h; Inert atmosphere; | 6.1 Dimethyl terephthalate Terephthalic acid (20 g, 120 mmol) was taken in MeOH (200 mL) at 25-26 °C under nitrogen atmosphere. Thionyl chloride (42.9 g, 361 mmol) was added slowly over 10 minutes. The reaction mixture was heated to 80 °C for 12 h (reaction completion was confirmed by LCMS). The reaction mixture was cooled to 25-26 °C and concentrated to get the crude product as white solid (25 g). The crude product was taken up in 10% NaHC03 solution (50 mL) and stirred for 10 minutes. The precipitated solids were filtered, washed with water (50 mL) and dried to get the pure product as white solid (19 g, 82% yield). 1H NMR (DMSO-d6, 400MHz) δ 8.06 (s, 2H), 3.87 (s, 3H). HPLC (Method F) Rt 3.68 min (Purity: 99.5%). |
64% | With 4-methyl-morpholine; 4-(4,6-Dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methylmorpholin-4-ium chloride at 20℃; for 4h; | |
64% | With 4-methyl-morpholine; 4-(4,6-Dimethoxy-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-methylmorpholin-4-ium chloride at 20℃; for 4h; | |
With hydrogenchloride | ||
at 180 - 250℃; | ||
With sulfuric acid | ||
With hydrogenchloride | ||
With sulfuric acid at 100℃; for 24h; | ||
With sulfuric acid | ||
With sulfuric acid for 24h; Reflux; | ||
With sulfuric acid Reflux; | ||
With sulfuric acid for 6h; Reflux; | Synthesis of the probe (BPTH) The synthetic procedure of the probe is illustrated in the Scheme 1. Methanolic solution (10 ml) of terephthalic acid in the presence of con.H2SO4 (10:1) was refluxed for 6 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and evaporated under pressure, provided a dirty white colour solid. The solid formed was extracted with DCM for at least 3 times in order to completely remove the impurities and dried using MgSO4. The solution was then filtered and evaporated to give milky white solid (1 mmol). Subsequently, it was re-dissolved in methanol followed by slow addition of hydrazine monohydrate (2 mmol) and allowed to reflux for 3 h. The obtained white solid (bis-hydrazine derivative) was filtered,washed with water and dried under vacuum. A hot-aqueous solution of bis-hydrazine derivative (1 mmol) was mixed dropwise with pyridine-2-aldehyde (2 mmol) and again refluxed at 80 °C for2 h. The probe (BPTH) was obtained as a white puffy solid which was filtered and dried in vacuum. | |
With SiO2-SO3H supported 1-methyl-3-ethylimidazole bisulfate at 200℃; for 12h; Green chemistry; | 4 Example 4 ILa-SiO2-SO3H (0.2 g, ILa: SiO2: SO3H = 1: 3: 1), 100 mmol of terephthalic acid, 20 ml of methanol was added to the azeotropic distillation split esterification reactor, Using automatic temperature control program temperature was raised to the reaction temperature 200 °C, the reaction 12 hours, the reaction pressure remained unchanged. The reaction product was analyzed by GC and HPLC. The reaction results are shown in Table 1. | |
With thionyl chloride Reflux; | 4.2. 4-(Methoxycarbonyl)benzoic acid (11) A solution of terephthalic acid 6 (15.0 g, 90.3 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) andmethanol (375 mL) was refluxed for 30 min, after which thionylchloride (26 mL, 42.3 g, 3.97 equiv.) was added dropwise and themixture was maintained overnight at reflux. After being cooled to roomtemperature, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Themixture was extracted twice with diethyl ether (100×4) and washedwith KOH (0.1 M) solution. The combined organic layers were driedover anhydrous MgSO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to give abrown solid. To a portion of the dimethyl ester (8.95 g, 43.0 mmol, 1equiv.), methanol (150 mL) was added and the mixture was heated at40 °C for 15 min. Potassium hydroxide pellets (2.41 g, 43.0 mmol, 1equiv.) were then added and the mixture was refluxed overnight. Themixture was cooled and the alcohol evaporated. The resulting crudeproduct was dissolved in water and extracted with EtOAc (100×1 mL).The aqueous layer was acidified with HCl solution (1 M) and the precipitatewas filtered. The precipitate was then extracted with diethylether, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, concentrated under reducedpressure to give monoester 11 (7.05 g, 36.4 mmol, 85% over two steps)as a white solid. | |
With thionyl chloride at 0 - 20℃; for 12h; | ||
265 mg | With sulfuric acid at 70℃; for 3h; | Step 1: 300mg of terephthalic acid (1.8mmol) were dissolved in 3mL of MeOH in a flask and 100µL of concentrated H2SO4 were added. The mixture was refluxed for 3h, then neutralized with 1M NaOH solution. After that, 7mL of H2O were added and extracted with AcOEt (4×8mL). The combined organic layers were dried with anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure. 265mg of esterified product (1.4mmol) were recovered. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
95.3% | With methanol; potassium hydroxide at 65℃; for 4h; | 1.1 (1) Preparation of monomethyl terephthalate Add 1.35L of methanol and 56g (1mol) of KOH to the reaction flask, raise the temperature to dissolve all the KOH, then add 194.2g (1mol) of dimethyl terephthalate, and continue to raise the temperature to reflux reaction (the temperature is 65±1) , TLC monitors the progress of the reaction. After the reaction is kept for 4 hours, the methanol is recovered by distillation under reduced pressure. The obtained white solid was dissolved in water, stirred for 30 minutes and filtered, and about 11 g of unreacted raw material was recovered. The filtrate was acidified with hydrochloric acid (36% by mass) to a pH of about 4, and the product precipitated, stirred for 1h, filtered, and washed with water to obtain monomethyl terephthalate. The one-step reaction yield was 95.3% (yield after excluding the recovered raw materials), purity 98.0%. |
86% | With potassium hydroxide In methanol Reflux; | Mono-methyl terephatalate (IIa) A methanol (60 mL) solution ofIa (4.0 g, 20.6 mmol) and KOH (1.2 g, 21.6 mmol) was refluxed overnightand then evaporated. Then 80 mL of water was added and thesolution was extracted three times with 10 mL of CH2Cl2. Adjusting pHof the water solution to 1 with HCl resulted in precipitation of a whitesolid which after filtration, washing with water and drying yielded pureIIa. |
86% | With potassium hydroxide In methanol Reflux; | Mono-methyl terephatalate (IIa) A methanol (60 mL) solution ofIa (4.0 g, 20.6 mmol) and KOH (1.2 g, 21.6 mmol) was refluxed overnightand then evaporated. Then 80 mL of water was added and thesolution was extracted three times with 10 mL of CH2Cl2. Adjusting pHof the water solution to 1 with HCl resulted in precipitation of a whitesolid which after filtration, washing with water and drying yielded pureIIa. White solid. Yield 86 %. EA (calc.) for C9H8O4 (180.16): C,60.00; H, 4.48 %; found: C, 60.01; H, 4.45 %. 1H NMR (400 MHz,DMSO-d6, 298 K, ppm): δ 8.06 (s, 4H), 3.88 (s, 3H). |
80% | With potassium hydroxide In methanol for 3.5h; Reflux; | |
78% | With potassium hydroxide In methanol at 80 - 120℃; for 5h; | |
77% | With potassium hydroxide In methanol for 3.5h; Heating; | |
73% | With potassium hydroxide In methanol; diethyl ether; water monomer for 21h; | |
56% | With potassium hydroxide In methanol; diethyl ether; water monomer at 20℃; for 24h; | 4-(Methoxycarbonyl)benzoic acid (33) To a solution of 32 (2.0 g, 10.0 mmol) in methanol and ether(methanol:ether = 1:1, 20 mL), a solution of KOH (0.58 g, 10.0 mmol) in methanol and water(methanol:water = 10:1, 10 mL) was added dropwise at 0 C. The mixture was stirred at roomtemperature for 24 h. After adding water (50 mL), the mixture was partitioned between waterand ether. Then treating the aqueous layer successively with 1 N HCl until pH = 1. The mixturewas partitioned between water and EtOAc. The organic layer was washed with a saturated aqueoussolution of brine, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, and concentrated under vacuum to give 33 (1.0 g,56%) as a white solid. m.p. 188~192°C. |
With methanol; potassium hydroxide; benzene | ||
With potassium hydroxide | ||
With sulfuric acid; acetic acid | ||
With potassium carbonate | ||
With potassium hydroxide In methanol | ||
With sodium hydroxide In methanol; acetone Heating; | ||
With water monomer | ||
7.86 g | Stage #1: 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid dimethyl ester In methanol at 20℃; for 0.5h; Reflux; Inert atmosphere; Stage #2: With potassium hydroxide In deuteromethanol Reflux; Inert atmosphere; | |
With lithium hydroxide monohydrate In methanol; water monomer for 4h; | ||
7.05 g | With potassium hydroxide In methanol Reflux; | 4.2. 4-(Methoxycarbonyl)benzoic acid (11) A solution of terephthalic acid 6 (15.0 g, 90.3 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) andmethanol (375 mL) was refluxed for 30 min, after which thionylchloride (26 mL, 42.3 g, 3.97 equiv.) was added dropwise and themixture was maintained overnight at reflux. After being cooled to roomtemperature, the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Themixture was extracted twice with diethyl ether (100×4) and washedwith KOH (0.1 M) solution. The combined organic layers were driedover anhydrous MgSO4, filtered and concentrated in vacuo to give abrown solid. To a portion of the dimethyl ester (8.95 g, 43.0 mmol, 1equiv.), methanol (150 mL) was added and the mixture was heated at40 °C for 15 min. Potassium hydroxide pellets (2.41 g, 43.0 mmol, 1equiv.) were then added and the mixture was refluxed overnight. Themixture was cooled and the alcohol evaporated. The resulting crudeproduct was dissolved in water and extracted with EtOAc (100×1 mL). The aqueous layer was acidified with HCl solution (1 M) and the precipitatewas filtered. The precipitate was then extracted with diethylether, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, concentrated under reducedpressure to give monoester 11 (7.05 g, 36.4 mmol, 85% over two steps)as a white solid. This product was used without further purification. 1HNMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.91 (m, 4H, HAr), 3.76 (3, 3H, OMe); 13CNMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.1 (C]O), 165.0 (C]O), 132.9 (CAr),132.4 (CAr), 128.4 (CAr), 128.2 (CAr), 51.2 (OMe); HRMS (ESI) m/zcalcd. for [C9H7O4]-: 179.0339, obsd.: 179.0339. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
95% | With sulfuric acid; nitric acid; at 10 - 20℃; for 1h; | In a 1000 ml four-necked flask, 926.97 g of 98percent sulfuric acid was introduced, Stirring down to 10~15°C ,Slowly add 97.7percent nitric acid 200.72g; Plus complete, keep 10~15 °C by adding dimethyl terephthalate 300.0g, about 30min plus, The reaction temperature was controlled at 15~20°C , After incubation for 30 minutes, The end point of the reaction was confirmed by TLC.After stirring for 15 minutes, the filter cake was rinsed with 900 ml of 5percent aqueous solution of sodium hydroxide and then rinsed with 500 ml of water to neutral. The filter cake was put into 3000 ml of water, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 minutes. Four bottles, add 1500g of ethanol for recrystallization: first heated to 50 ~ 55 , so that all the dissolved solids, and then cooled to 5 ° C below the full precipitation of the material; filtration, filter drying, the influx of goods 382.5g, 60°C dried in vacuo to obtain 351.2 g of white crystals in 95percent yield (as dimethyl dimethyl terephthalate), a gas chromatographic content of> 99percent, a melting point of 73.8 to 75.5 ° C (reported melting point: 73 to 76 ° C) . |
82.9% | With sulfuric acid; nitric acid; at 20℃; for 1h;Cooling; | nitration reaction: electromagnetic stirring dimethyl terephthalic acid (compound I) 10g is dissolved in 50 ml concentrated sulfuric acid, ice-bath cooling, will 5 ml fuming nitric acid slowly dropping to the reaction flask, does not exceed the temperature is maintained during 20 °C; of after-reaction of adding 1h, TLC (thin layer chromatography) monitoring the consumption of raw materials, the reaction liquid stirring slowly poured into 100 ml ice water, separating white solid, filtering, the filter cake is washed with saturated NaHCO3pH8 to, drying shall 10.2g white solid, that is, 2-nitro-terephthalic acid dimethyl ester (compound II), as shown in Figure 1, the yield 82.9percent |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
99% | With hydrogen; sodium ethanolate In 1,4-dioxane at 80℃; for 16h; | |
99% | With potassium <i>tert</i>-butylate; hydrogen; C27H23BrMnN2O2P In ethanol at 90℃; for 20h; | |
96% | With C13H34BFeNOP2; hydrogen In tetrahydrofuran at 100℃; for 18h; Autoclave; Inert atmosphere; |
95% | With C15H29MnNO3P2(1+)*Br(1-); potassium <i>tert</i>-butylate; hydrogen In 1,4-dioxane at 110℃; for 24h; Inert atmosphere; Autoclave; | |
92% | With zirconium(IV) borohydride In tetrahydrofuran at 25℃; for 2h; | |
90% | With methanol; tris((2-(diphenylphosphino)ethyl)amino)ruthenium monocarbonyl; hydrogen In toluene for 18h; Autoclave; Glovebox; Heating; | II.II.1; II.II.7.5 II.1 Base-Free Hydrogenation of Esters (Dimethyl terephthalate) with MeOH as activator In a dry argon filled glove box, a 20 mL Teflon coated stainless steel autoclave was charged with the catalyst Ru(L)CO (I) (0.003 mmol), dimethyl terephthalate (1 .2 mmol), methanol (0.01 mL) and toluene (6 mL). The argon atmosphere in the autoclave was replaced with H2 by twice pressurization to 30 bar, and pressure release at room temperature. The autoclave was then pressurized with H2 gas (60 bar). The solution was heated at 130 °C (heating mantel tempera- ture) with stirring for 18 hrs. After cooling to 0 °C, the system was vented carefully and purged for 1 minute with argon. The conversion of starting material was analyzed by GC-MS, using an Agilent Technologies 6890N gas chromatography system coupled with an Agilent Technologies 5975B mass spectrometer and equipped with an Agilent Technologies HP-5MS capillary col- umn (30 m x 0.250 mm / 0.25 pm). Full conversion, with no residual dimethyl terephthalate was observed. The solution was then filtered, and the product 1 ,4-phenylenedimethanol, was col- lected and dried under vacuum. 147 mg product (90 % yield) were obtained as a white crystal- line powder. The product identification and purity (> 99 %) were analyzed by 1H-NMR (tetrachlo- roethane as internal standard, 200 MHz Bruker Avance, in CD3OD). |
85% | With hydrogen; C28H25BrMnN2O2P; lithium tert-butoxide In propan-1-ol at 100℃; for 12h; Autoclave; | |
77.9% | With sodium tetrahydroborate In methanol for 6h; Cooling with ice; Reflux; | 41.a (a) 1,4-bis(hydroxymethyl)benzene [0317] 138.0 g (0.75 mol) of dimethyl terephthalate was dissolved in 400 mL of methanol, cooled in an ice bath. 75.20 g (2.0 mol) of sodium borohydride was added in batches, and the addiction was completed within 2 hours. After addition, the reaction mixture was heated and refluxed for 4 hours. Methanol was removed under reduced pressure, the residue was dissolved with 500 mL of dichloromethane, the dichloromethane layer was washed with water three times (150 mL3), the organic phase was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, the desiccant was removed by filtration, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure to obtain 80.80 g of the target product, with a yield of 77.9%, m/z138.07. |
70% | With zinc(II) tetrahydroborate; cyclohexene In tetrahydrofuran for 2h; Heating; | |
63% | With [iPrPN(H)P]2Fe(H)(CO)(BH4); hydrogen In tetrahydrofuran at 115℃; for 24h; Glovebox; Sealed tube; | |
14% | With n-butyllithium; [(1,2-bis[(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imino]acenaphthene)FeCl2] In hexane; toluene at 100℃; for 20h; Inert atmosphere; Schlenk technique; Glovebox; Sealed tube; | |
With tetrahydrofuran; lithium aluminium tetrahydride | ||
With sodium tetrahydroborate; aluminium trichloride; diethylene glycol dimethyl ether | ||
With sodium bis(2-methoxyethoxy)aluminium dihydride | ||
(electrochemical reduction); | ||
With lithium aluminium tetrahydride | ||
97 % Chromat. | With hydrogen In 1,4-dioxane at 115℃; for 5h; | |
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: dichloro(benzene)ruthenium(II) dimer; 2-((di-p-tolylphosphino)methyl)-1-methyl-1H-imidazole; potassium <i>tert</i>-butylate; hydrogen / tetrahydrofuran / 4.5 h / 100 °C / 37503.8 Torr 2: dichloro(benzene)ruthenium(II) dimer; 2-((di-p-tolylphosphino)methyl)-1-methyl-1H-imidazole; potassium <i>tert</i>-butylate; hydrogen / tetrahydrofuran / 4.5 h / 100 °C / 37503.8 Torr | ||
60 %Chromat. | With 1,1'-methylene-bis(3-benzyl-1H-imidazol-3-ium) diiodide; [ruthenium(II)(η6-1-methyl-4-isopropyl-benzene)(chloride)(μ-chloride)]2; potassium <i>tert</i>-butylate; hydrogen In 1,4-dioxane at 100℃; for 6h; | |
96 %Chromat. | With [RuCl2(2-(diphenylphosphino)-N-((6-((diphenylphosphino)methyl)pyridin-2-yl)methyl)ethan-1-amine)]; potassium <i>tert</i>-butylate; hydrogen In tetrahydrofuran at 80℃; for 5h; Autoclave; | |
With C43H42NOP3Ru; hydrogen In methanol; toluene at 130℃; for 17h; Inert atmosphere; Glovebox; Schlenk technique; | ||
160 mg | With lithium aluminium tetrahydride In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 15h; Inert atmosphere; | Step 2: The product of the reaction carried out in step 1 was dissolved in 4mL of dry THF and then 4mmol of LiAlH4 (155mg) were added and the mixture was vigorously stirred for 15h at room temperature under an inert atmosphere of N2. Then 5mL of AcOEt and 5mL of an aqueous solution of H2SO4 (10%) were added. The aqueous phase was extracted with successive portions of AcOEt (8×5mL). The organic phases were combined, dried with anhydrous Na2SO4 and evaporated under reduced pressure. 160mg of the corresponding diol (that was assumed as 1.16mmol, 1,4-phenylenedimethanol) were recovered. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
95% | With hydrazine; In ethanol; for 5h;Reflux; | Into a 25-ml round-bottomed flask equipped with a refluxcondenser, a mixture of 1,4-phenylene dimethyl carboxylate(1.00 mol), hydrazine monohydrate (2.50 mol), and ethanol(10 ml) were placed and refluxed for 5 h. Upon cooling,crystals separated, which were filtered and washed withethanol. White; yield (%) = 95; m.p. (C)>300; FT-IR: 3324,3033, 1623, 1605, 1540, 1489, 1340, 1291, 1103, 1016, 927,886, 736, 713, 638 (cm-1); 1H-NMR (300 MHz): 4.51 (s,4H), 7.90 (s, 4H), 9.90 (s, 2H) ppm. |
With hydrazine hydrate; for 3h;Reflux; | The synthetic procedure of the probe is illustrated in the Scheme 1. Methanolic solution (10 ml) of terephthalic acid in the presence of con.H2SO4 (10:1) was refluxed for 6 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and evaporated under pressure, provided a dirty white colour solid. The solid formed was extracted with DCM for at least 3 times in order to completely remove the impurities and dried using MgSO4. The solution was then filtered and evaporated to give milky white solid (1 mmol). Subsequently, it was re-dissolved in methanol followed by slow addition of hydrazine monohydrate (2 mmol) and allowed to reflux for 3 h. The obtained white solid (bis-hydrazine derivative) was filtered,washed with water and dried under vacuum. A hot-aqueous solution of bis-hydrazine derivative (1 mmol) was mixed dropwise with pyridine-2-aldehyde (2 mmol) and again refluxed at 80 C for2 h. The probe (BPTH) was obtained as a white puffy solid which was filtered and dried in vacuum. | |
10 g | With hydrazine hydrate; In ethanol; chloroform; for 4h;Reflux; | Dimethyl terephthalate (h) 10g (51. 5mmol) ethanol, 15 ml, is dissolved in a mixed solvent of chloroform 10 ml, hydrate alkylhydrazine 1 25 therein. Adding 8g (515mmol), 4 is made to circulate heating time. After cooling, the solid is separated by filtration in a reaction solution, using ethanol 10 ml, filter to 2 times after washing, drying under reduced pressure, 10g of compound (i) is obtained. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
93% | With C30H42N2; potassium <i>tert</i>-butylate In tetrahydrofuran at 20℃; for 12h; Molecular sieve; | |
83% | With potassium <i>tert</i>-butylate In tetrahydrofuran for 0.5h; | |
75% | With 1,3-di(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-2-(pentafluorophenyl)-2,4,5-trihydroimidazole In tetrahydrofuran at 65℃; for 3h; |
72% | With tris(dimethylamino)methane In tetrahydrofuran at 70℃; for 6h; | |
With boric acid | ||
With lithium hydride | ||
With manganese(II) acetate | ||
With manganese(II) acetate at 200℃; | ||
With magnesium acetate; manganese(II) acetate at 190℃; for 6.5h; Inert atmosphere; | ||
With zinc diacetate at 180℃; for 3h; Dean-Stark; | 2.2. Sample preparation DMT, 35.5 g (0.573 mol) EG and 0.0799 g(4.35 1-4 mol) zinc acetate were added to a 250-mL bottle equipped with a Deane-Stark trap with a condense. The reaction system was firstly heated to 180 C for 3 h. As the reaction proceeded, methanol was released. After a stoichiometric amount of methanol was removed, the mixturewas poured into an excess of warm water,and the precipitate bis(2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate (BHET) was obtained. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
76% | With sodium hydride In tetrahydrofuran at 50℃; for 33h; Inert atmosphere; | 1 4.1.1. 3,3'-(1,4-Phenylene)bis(1-phenylpropane-1,3-dione) (2). To a suspension of NaH (4.80 g, 200 mmol) in dry THF (100 mL), dimethyl terephthalate (9.71 g, 50.0 mmol) and acetophenone (11.7 mL, 100 mmol) were added and stirred for 20 min at ambient temperature under Ar atmosphere. Then the mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 33 h. After cooling the mixture to ambient temperature, the reaction was quenched by the addition of aqueous HCl (2 M, 100 mL) and a large amount of water. The resultant suspension was filtered and the collected solid was washed with water and chloroform, and dried in vacuo to yield 2. The combined filtrate was extracted with chloroform and washed with water, dried over MgSO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude material was recrystallized from toluene to yield 2 (14.0 g, 37.8 mmol, 76%) a sa light yellow solid; mp 175.9-176.7 °C (lit. 176-177 °C).21 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K): d 16.84 (s, 2H, enol-OH), 8.10 (s, 4H,Ar-H), 8.05-7.99 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 7.63-7.56 (m, 2H, Ar-H), 7.56-7.49 (m, 4H, Ar-H), 6.93 (s, 2H, enol-CH) ppm. 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 298 K): δ 187.2, 183.6 (4C, C=O), 138.8, 135.5, 133.0, 128.9, 127.5, 127.5 (18C, Ar-C), 93.9 (2C, -CH2-) ppm. IR (ATR): 3048 (C-H), 1524 (C=O) cm-1. |
With sodium amide |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
73% | Stage #1: 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid dimethyl ester With potassium hydroxide In methanol; toluene at 65℃; for 3h; Stage #2: With thionyl chloride In toluene at 67℃; for 3h; Inert atmosphere; | 1 This example demonstrates the preparation of 4-chlorocarbonyl- benzoic acid methyl ester having the following structure. In a 4 L kettle with mechanical stirrer, reflux condenser, addition funnel, thermometer, water bath and hot plate, 438 g dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) and 2700 mL toluene were added. The kettle was heated to about 65 00 to dissolve all the DMT. After dissolution, a potassium hydroxide solution (144.54 g in 700 mL methanol) was added dropwise over 45 minutes. The reaction was stirred at 65 00 for three hours and then the reaction cooled to room temperature overnight. The solid was collected after filtration and washed with 3750 mL toluene at 80 00. The product was filtered again and dried in the oven at 110 00. The yield was 465.9 g(95.3%).In a 2 Lthree neck round bottom flask with mechanical stirrer, addition funnel, water bath, thermometer, nitrogen sweep, and hot plate, 130.31 g of the product made in previous step and 1000 mL toluene were added. Then 48 mL of thionyl chloride was added dropwise. After the completion of addition, the mixture was heated to 67 00 for three hours. The reaction cooled to room temperature and was stirred overnight. The contents were filtered to collect the filtrate. The excess solvent was removed by vacuum and 86.52 g of product was obtained (73% yield). |
50% | With iodine; phosphorus trichloride at 160℃; for 48h; Schlenk technique; Sealed tube; | |
(i) KOH, MeOH, (ii) SOCl2, Py, benzene; Multistep reaction; |
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: 73 percent / KOH / methanol; diethyl ether; H2O / 21 h 2: 91 percent / thionyl chloride; pyridine / benzene / 5 h / Heating | ||
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: N2H4 2: chlorine; HCl | ||
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: aq. KOH / methanol 2: SOCl2 | ||
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1.1: methanol / 0.5 h / 20 °C / Reflux; Inert atmosphere 1.2: Reflux; Inert atmosphere 2.1: thionyl chloride / 4 h / Reflux; Inert atmosphere | ||
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: potassium hydroxide / methanol; toluene / 5.5 h / 45 - 50 °C 2: bis(trichloromethyl) carbonate / toluene; N,N-dimethyl-formamide / Reflux | ||
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: potassium hydroxide / toluene; methanol / 3.75 h / 65 °C 2: thionyl chloride / toluene / 3 h / 67 °C / Inert atmosphere | ||
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: potassium hydroxide / methanol; diethyl ether; water / 24 h / 20 °C 2: thionyl chloride; pyridine / 24 h / Reflux | ||
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: potassium hydroxide / methanol / 3.5 h / Reflux 2: oxalyl dichloride; N,N-dimethyl-formamide / dichloromethane / 4 h / 0 - 20 °C | ||
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: potassium hydroxide / methanol / Reflux 2: thionyl chloride / 2.5 h / Reflux | ||
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: potassium hydroxide; methanol / 4 h / 65 °C 2: N,N-dimethyl-formamide; thionyl chloride / toluene / 2 h / Reflux |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
85% | With carbon monoxide; sodium acetate In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 150℃; for 20h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
82% | With carbon monoxide; sodium acetate In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 150℃; for 20h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With hydrogen;2% Pd/C; at 20 - 200℃; under 1277.21 - 104192 Torr; for 2h;Product distribution / selectivity; | Example 7; The catalyst produced in Example 1 (5 g) in a stainless steel catalyst basket was loaded in a 300 cc stainless steel autoclave. Then 170 g of DMCD and 30 g of DMT were added to the autoclave. Then, the autoclave was agitated and purged with 10 psig nitrogen twice at ambient temperature and then purged with 0.7 bars guage (barg) (10 psig) hydrogen. Then, the autoclave was heated to 200 C. at a heating rate of 10 C./minute and pressurized to 137.5 barg (2000 psig) with hydrogen. After 2 hours, the autoclave was cooled to about 70 C. and purged with nitrogen. Finally, the solution was discharged from the autoclave and analyzed by gas chromatography. DMT conversion was 68% and selectivity to DMCD was 95%. | |
With hydrogen;0.15% ruthenium and 2% palladium on graphite; at 20 - 180℃; under 1277.21 - 104192 Torr; for 3h;Product distribution / selectivity; | Example 10; The catalyst produced in Example 4 (5 g) in a stainless steel catalyst basket was loaded in a 300 cc stainless steel autoclave. Then 170 g of DMCD and 30 g of DMT were added to the autoclave. Then, the autoclave was agitated and purged with 0.7 barg (10 psig) nitrogen twice at ambient temperature and then purged with 0.7 barg (10 psig) hydrogen. Then, the autoclave was heated to 180 C. at a heating rate of 10 C./minute and pressurized to 2000 psig with hydrogen. After 3 hours, the autoclave was cooled to about 70 C. and purged with nitrogen. Finally, the solution was discharged from the autoclave and analyzed with a gas chromatography. DMT conversion was 99% and selectivity to DMCD was 97%. | |
With hydrogen;0.1% ruthenium and 2% palladium on silicon carbide; at 20 - 200℃; under 1277.21 - 104192 Torr; for 3h;Product distribution / selectivity; | Example 11; The catalyst produced in Example 5 (10 g) in a stainless steel catalyst basket was loaded in a 300 cc stainless steel autoclave. Then 170 g of DMCD and 30 g of DMT were added to the autoclave. Then, the autoclave was agitated and purged with 0.7 barg (10 psig) nitrogen twice at ambient temperature and then purged with 0.7 barg (10 psig) hydrogen. Then, the autoclave was heated to 200 C. at a heating rate of 10 C./minute and pressurized to 137.5 barg (2000 psig) with hydrogen. After 3 hours, the autoclave was cooled to about 70 C. and purged with nitrogen. Finally, the solution was discharged from the autoclave and analyzed by gas chromatography. DMT conversion was 83% and selectivity to DMCD was 92%. |
With hydrogen;0.3% nickel and 2% palladium on graphite; at 20 - 200℃; under 1277.21 - 104192 Torr; for 3h;Product distribution / selectivity; | Example 8; The catalyst produced in Example 2 (5 g) in a stainless steel catalyst basket was loaded in a 300 cc stainless steel autoclave. Then 170 g of DMCD and 30 g of DMT were added to the autoclave. Then, the autoclave was agitated and purged with 0.7 barg (10 psig) nitrogen twice at ambient temperature and then purged with 0.7 barg (10 psig) hydrogen. Then, the autoclave was heated to 200 C. at a heating rate of 10 C./minute and pressurized to 137.5 barg (2000 psig) with hydrogen. After 3 hours, the autoclave was cooled to about 70 C. and purged with nitrogen. Finally, the solution was discharged from the autoclave and analyzed by gas chromatography. DMT conversion was 73% and selectivity to DMCD was 98%. | |
With hydrogen;0.8% ruthenium and 1% palladium on silicon carbide; at 20 - 200℃; under 1277.21 - 104192 Torr; for 3h;Product distribution / selectivity; | Example 12; The catalyst produced in Example 6 (10 g) in a stainless steel catalyst basket was loaded in a 300 cc stainless steel autoclave. Then 170 g of DMCD and 30 g of DMT were added to the autoclave. Then, the autoclave was agitated and purged with 0.7 barg (10 psig) nitrogen twice at ambient temperature and then purged with 0.7 barg (10 psig) hydrogen. Then, the autoclave was heated to 200 C. at a heating rate of 10 C./minute and pressurized to 2000 psig with hydrogen. After 3 hours, the autoclave was cooled to about 70 C. and purged with nitrogen. Finally, the solution was discharged from the autoclave and analyzed by gas chromatography. DMT conversion was 71% and selectivity to DMCD was 91%. | |
With hydrogen;1% Pd/C; at 20 - 180℃; under 1277.21 - 104192 Torr; for 3h;Product distribution / selectivity; | Example 9; The catalyst produced in Example 3 (5 g) in a stainless steel catalyst basket was loaded in a 300 cc stainless steel autoclave. Then 170 g of dimethyl DMCD and 30 g of DMT were added to the autoclave. Then, the autoclave was agitated and purged with 0.7 barg (10 psig) nitrogen twice at ambient temperature and then purged with 0.7 barg (10 psig) hydrogen. Then, the autoclave was heated to 180 C. at a heating rate of 10 C./minute and pressurized to 137.5 barg (2000 psig) with hydrogen. After 3 hours, the autoclave was cooled to about 70 C. and purged with nitrogen. Finally, the solution was discharged from the autoclave and analyzed by gas chromatography. DMT conversion was 99% and selectivity to DMCD was 97%. | |
With Rh/Al2O3; hydrogen; In ethyl acetate; at 140℃; under 22502.3 Torr; | Hydrogenation was carried out under the conditions in example 1 to produce DMCD. However, the difference between examples 1 and 3 was that the pressure was increased to 30 kg/cm2 in example 3. Upon completion of the reaction, the product was discharged from the bottom of the reactor. The conversion rate of DMT was 100.0%, and the selectivity of DMCD was 100.0%. | |
With 5% active carbon-supported ruthenium; hydrogen; In ethyl acetate; at 70℃; under 22502.3 Torr; for 3h;Sealed tube; | Embodiment 3: in the reaction kettle by adding 0.5 g dimethyl terephthalate, 20 g ethyl acetate, 0 . 125 g5% Ru/C catalyst. The reaction kettle and seal a breath, filling 3 mpa hydrogen, in 70 C reaction under the condition of 3 hours. After the reaction, to a room temperature sampling, by centrifugal filtration and the like treatment and sent to the gas phase detection, the experimental results as shown in table 1 in which the sequence number 1. | |
201 g | With Ru/Al; hydrogen; at 150℃; under 22502.3 Torr; for 5h;Autoclave; | Example 1 Dimethyl terephthalate (200 g) and 5% ruthenium/alumina catalyst (3 g) as a catalyst were placed in a 500-ml autoclave provided with an electric, magnetic stirring device. After the system was purged with hydrogen, the reaction was performed at a reaction temperature of 150 C. under a hydrogen pressure of 3 MPa for 5 hours. After cooling, the catalyst was filtered off, and 201 g of dimethyl 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylate was obtained. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
99% | With titanium silicate; dihydrogen peroxide for 8h; Heating; | |
88% | With tert.-butylhydroperoxide In decane at 25℃; for 6h; Inert atmosphere; | 38 General experimental procedure for the preparation of methyl esters: General procedure: In an oven dried round bottom flask, 4-nitrobenzaldehyde la (1 g, 6.61 mmol) and Titanium superoxide catalyst (0.1 g, 10 wt%) in dry MeOH (1.32 mL, 33.05 mmol) was added TBHP in decane (5-6 M) (2.4 mL, 13.22 mmol) in a dropwise manner under nitrogen atmosphere. Then the flask was stirred at 25 oC for 6 h. After complete disappearance of aldehyde (judged by TLC; using DNP solution), the reaction mixture was filtered through sintered funnel using CH2C12 as eluent. Then the organic layer was extracted with CH2C12, dried over anhydrous Na2S04, and evaporated under reduced pressure. The crude product was purified by column chromatography over silica (230-400 mesh) using petroleum ether/ ethyl acetate (19: 1 v/v) as eluent to give methyl 4-nitrobenzoate. |
86% | With tert.-butylhydroperoxide In decane at 25℃; for 8h; Inert atmosphere; |
85% | With 2,2':6,2''-terpyridine; dichloro(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)rhodium (III) dimer; sodium acetate; sodium hydroxide at 90℃; for 24h; Green chemistry; chemoselective reaction; | |
65% | With Eco1a; dihydrogen peroxide In water at 20℃; for 17h; Reflux; | |
55% | With Oxone; indium(lll) trifluoromethanesulfonate for 1.5h; Reflux; | t.2, entry 6 General procedure: The starting aldehydematerials (1 mmol) were dissolved in MeOH (5 mL),and Oxone (1 mmol) and 10 mol % of In(OTf)3 were added atroom temperature. The reaction mixture was heated at reflux,and was monitored for completion by TLC. After the reactionmixture was filtered, the filtrate was condensed using arotary evaporator. Flash column chromatography on silica gelfurnished the corresponding products, which were confirmedby spectroscopy. |
39% | With triethylamine at 30℃; for 48h; | |
100 %Chromat. | Stage #1: methanol; terephthalaldehyde, With pyridine at 20℃; for 0.0833333h; Stage #2: With N-Bromosuccinimide at 20℃; for 9h; | |
With 1-hydroxytetraphenylcyclopentadienyl(tetraphenyl-2,4-cyclopentadien-1-one)-μ-hydrotetracarbonyldiruthenium(II) at 90℃; for 8h; Inert atmosphere; Schlenk technique; | 5 Example 5: Synthesis of Dimethyl Terephthalate (DMT) from Terephthalaldehyde Under a nitrogen atmosphere, an oven-dried 100 mL Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stir-bar and a Teflon plug was charged with the Shvo's catalyst (108 mg, 100 μmol, 1.0 mol %), terephthalaldehyde (1.35 g, 10 mmol, 99% purity), and anhydrous methanol (2 mL). The resulting mixture was heated at 90° C. for 8 hours using an oil-bath. After that the vessel was gradually allowed to come to room temperature and the volatiles (H2 and MeOH vapor) were carefully removed by opening the Teflon plug inside the hood. The liquid sample was analyzed by GC to determine the weight percent of dimethyl terephthalate (>99.9 wt %). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With zinc diacetate; chloroacetic acid at 70℃; for 24h; | ||
With zinc diacetate; chloroacetic acid at 70℃; for 24h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
99% | With potassium hydroxide at 100℃; for 12h; Autoclave; | |
92% | With potassium hydroxide at 100℃; for 12h; | 7 Example 7 General procedure: The excellent recycling ability realized with the new supported palladium-bis(oxazoline) complex in the methoxycarbonylation of iodobenzene encouraged us to study the scope of the new catalytic system and to examine its recycling ability in the alkoxycarbonylation reaction of a broad range of substrates using a CO pressure of 100 psi and KOH as a base. The methoxycarbonylation of 1,4-diiodobenzene was also successful and yields 92% of dimethylbenzene-1,4-dicarboxylate (Table 2, entry 11). |
100 % Chromat. | With triethylamine at 105℃; for 19h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With antimony(III) trioxide; Ti(OR)4; manganese(IV) acetate at 275℃; for 0.5h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With antimony(III) trioxide; Ti(OR)4; manganese(IV) acetate at 275℃; for 1h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With antimony(III) trioxide; Ti(OR)4; manganese(IV) acetate at 275℃; for 1.5h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With antimony(III) trioxide; Ti(OR)4; manganese(IV) acetate at 275℃; for 0.5h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
90% | With ethanolamine In xylene at 135℃; for 2h; | 1 Synthesis of bis-(β-hydroxyethyl)terephthalamide Synthesis of bis-(β-hydroxyethyl)terephthalamide.194 grams of dimethylterephthalate were dissolved in 1 liter of xylene at 135C. 128 grams of ethanolamine were added drop by drop. The methanol released was removed by means of distillation. After two hours' reaction bis-(β-hydroxyethyl)terephthalamide was isolated by means of filtration. The product was washed with xylene and was dried at 80C in a vacuum. The yield was 90%. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
99% | With ammonia In ethylene glycol at 20 - 80℃; for 25h; | 12 Terephthaldiamide (Method 1) Starting Materials Dimethyl Terephthalate 0.1 mol Ammonia (gas) Excess, bubbled through system Magnesium Methoxide (catalyst) 0.027 mol Ethylene Glycol 300 mL Operating Conditions Pressure Atmospheric Temperature/time regime Room temperature/1 h.; then 80° C./24 h. Reaction Progress Monitored by TLC Work-up The reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature, 1800 mL water added, pH adjusted to 3 with 50% aqueous sulfuric acid. The system was heated to 70-80° C. and maintained at that temperature during 30 minutes, cooled to room temperature and filtered under reduced pressure. The filter cake was washed thoroughly with water, drained and dried at 70-75° C. overnight. 16.3 g. of white, powdery crystals were obtained, m.p. 322.3-323.8° C. (Literature 330° C.) Yield 99% |
35% | With ammonium bicarbonate In ethylene glycol at 75 - 80℃; for 40h; | 13 Terephthaldiamide (Method 2) Starting Materials Dimethyl Terephthalate 0.1 mol Ammonium Carbonate 2.0 mol Ethylene Glycol 350 mL Operating Conditions Pressure Atmospheric Temperature/time regime 75-80° C./40 h. Reaction Progress Monitored by TLC Work-up The reaction mixture was cooled to 20° C., 1.5 L water added, pH adjusted to 6 with concentrated aqueous hydrochloric acid, cooled to 20° C. and filtered under reduced pressure. The filter cake was washed with 200 mL water, dried at 70-80° C. overnight, dispersed in 1 L methanol (absolute) at 70-75° C. during 30 minutes, and filtered under reduced pressure. 5.8 g. of white crystals were obtained (only one spot was observed by TLC) Yield 35% |
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: chlorine / benzene / 12 h / UV-irradiation 2: ammonium hydroxide / methanol / 1.5 h / Reflux |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
The other method involves a two-step ester exchange reaction and polymerization using dimethyl terephthalate and excess ethylene glycol. In this technique, the aforementioned step of reacting a terephthalate component and a diol component includes reacting dimethyl terephthalate and ethylene glycol in a heated, catalyzed ester exchange reaction (i.e., transesterification) to form bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-terephthalate monomers, as well as methanol as a byproduct. | ||
With zinc diacetate at 174℃; for 4h; Inert atmosphere; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
99.1% | With potassium hydroxide In methanol; toluene at 45 - 50℃; for 5.5h; | |
95% | With potassium hydroxide In methanol; toluene | 1 Monomethyl monopotassium terephthalate EXAMPLE 1 Monomethyl monopotassium terephthalate A solution of 87.5% KOH (143 g, 2.24 moles) in 870 mL of methanol was added to ground dimethylterephthalate (434 g, 2.24 moles) in 2,420 ml toluene at room temperature over a period of 45 minutes. The reaction mixture was heated at 65° C. for three hours with stirring and was then allowed to cool to room temperature. The solids were filtered, washed with 3500 ml of warm toluene, and dried to yield 464.08 grams (95% yield) of a white solid. IR (nujol) 1735, 1600, 1550, 1410, 1290, 730 cm-1. |
95.3% | With potassium hydroxide In methanol; toluene at 65℃; for 3.75h; | 1 PREPARATION EXAMPLE EX1 In a 4 L kettle with mechanical stirrer, reflux condenser, addition funnel, thermometer, water bath and hot plate, 438 g dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) and 2700 mL toluene were added. The kettle was heated to about 65° C. to dissolve all the DMT. After dissolution, a potassium hydroxide solution (144.54 g in 700 mL methanol) was added dropwise over 45 minutes. The reaction was stirred at 65° C. for three hours and then the reaction cooled to room temperature overnight. The solid was collected after filtration and washed with 3750 mL toluene at 80° C. The product was filtered again and dried in the oven at 110° C. The yield was 465.9 g (95.3%). |
2.85 gm (96%) | With potassium hydroxide In methanol; toluene | 1 Preparation of Monopotassium Methyl Terephthalate EXAMPLE 1 Preparation of Monopotassium Methyl Terephthalate This procedure is a modification of the one described by B. W. Hotten (Ind. Eng. Chem. 1957, 49, 1691-4). To a three-necked 50 ml round bottom flask equipped with a mechanical stirrer, reflux condenser and an addition funnel topped with a drying tube containing indicating Drierite were added 2.70 gm (0.0139 mole) of dimethyl terephthalate (ex Aldrich Chemical Co.) and 15 ml of toluene. A solution containing 0.76 gm (0.0136 mole) of potassium hydroxide and 10 ml of methanol was added dropwise to the diester solution. The mixture formed an immediate emulsion. The emulsion was heated to 65-70° C. and soon thereafter a precipitate began to form. After 30 minutes the reaction was complete. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and the solid collected on a Buchner funnel. The filter cake was washed several times with warm toluene and ether; thereupon the cake was dried in a vacuum oven at 60° C. The yield was 2.85 gm (96%). NMR (D2 O, tetramethylsilane, external standard): δ3.8 (s, 3H), 7.8 (s, 4H). IR (nujol mull): 1720 cm-1 (carbonyl ester). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With tetramethyl ammoniumhydroxide In water at 250℃; | 1 Example 1 This example demonstrates preparing 3GIT according to the process of the invention using DMT. To a 2-L stirred stainless steel vessel was added 873.90 g dimethyl terephthalate, 367.08 g 1,3-propanediol, 149.94 g isosorbide, 0.75 mL Catalyst A, and 1.8 mL tetramethylammonium hydroxide aqueous solution (25 weight %). The batch temperature was increased to a maximum [OF 240C] while methanol was removed through a column. When 288 g of condensate was removed, the reactor contents were taken down to 2.6 mm Hg (0.35 kPa) for polycondensation at a temperature [OF 250C.] The IV was measured as 0.50 dL/g and the Tg was 63. [5C.] Hunter color values were: L*=78.5, a*=0.02, and b*=7.7. The isosorbide content was 5.07 mole % and the polymer contained 0.07 mole [%] DPG. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
97.8% | In water at 70℃; for 12h; Green chemistry; | 3 (1) Waste PETG film pretreatment: The discarded PETG film was pulverized by pulverizer and placed in ethanol solution for stirring and then washed in a 75 ° C blast oven for 24 h to obtain a pretreated film.(2) EG alcohololysis PETG film: 10 parts by weight of PETG film prepared in step (1), 0.05 part by weight of zinc acetate and 51.6 parts by weight of ethylene glycol were added to a four-necked flask and passed through nitrogen to replace the PET air.And then open the condensed water, heated to 197 ° C, open stirring, heat reflux 3h after the end of the reaction, the reaction product is naturally cooled to 140 ° C, hot filter to get the intermediate product;(3) Methanol transesterification of dimethyl terephthalate: The intermediate product prepared in step (2) was distilled on a rotary evaporator at an operating temperature of 150 ° C and a distillation time of 1 h to give the distilled product (BHET), 15.4 parts by weight of diethylene glycol terephthalate (BHET), 79 parts by weight of methanol and 0.1 part by weight of the transesterification catalyst were added to a four-necked flask to open the condensed Water, stirred and heated to 70 ° C and incubated for 2 h. The reaction was completed.The reaction product was allowed to stand in a 5 ° C environment for 12 hours, and then a high purity dimethyl terephthalate monomer was obtained by filtration and dried in a blower at 80 ° C for 24 h to obtain the product of the present invention as DMT-3 ;(4) Recovery of methanol and ethylene glycol: The filtrate prepared in step (2) was distilled on a rotary evaporator at an operating temperature of 150 ° C and a pressure of -0.1 MPa to obtain the first recovered ethylene glycol The filtrate prepared in step (3) was distilled on a rotary evaporator to collect a fraction at 50 ° C, i.e., methanol, and the distillation temperature was raised to 150 ° C to obtain a second recovered EG. |
In ethylene glycol at 75 - 80℃; for 1h; | 1-3 Example 1100 g of cut pieces of polyethylene terephthalate fabric dyed in black (nitrogen content in fabric prior to dye extraction: 900 ppm) which was a dyed polyester fiber to be subjected to the method of the invention, and 600 g of paraxylene were charged into a 2 L separable flask. A dye extraction step was carried out by performing heating and stirring under atmospheric pressure at 130° C. for 10 minutes. After the completion of extraction, as a solid liquid separation step, suction filtration with an aspirator was carried out, thereby to separate dye-containing paraxylene from the fabric from which the dye had been extracted (dye-extracted polyester fiber).Thereafter, the dye-extracted polyester fiber and 600 g of another paraxylene were charged into a separable flask, and extraction of the dye was carried out under the same conditions. After the completion of extraction, solid liquid separation was carried out again, thereby to separate dye-containing paraxylene and the fabric from which the dye had been extracted and removed.Subsequently, about 100 g of the fabric from which the dye had been extracted and removed and 600 g of another ethylene glycol were charged into a separable flask. A dye extraction step was carried out by performing heating and stirring under atmospheric pressure at 170° C. for 10 minutes. Most of the paraxylene contained in the fabric is evaporated through an exhaust tube by heating at this step. The evaporated paraxylene is recovered by a condenser. After the completion of extraction, a solid liquid separation step was carried out again, thereby to separate a dye-containing ethylene glycol from the fabric from which the dye had been extracted and removed.Subsequently, as a depolymerization reaction step, 100 g of the dye-extracted fabric was charged into a mixture of 400 g of ethylene glycol preheated up to 185° C., and 3 g of potassium carbonate as a depolymerization catalyst. That was allowed to react under atmospheric pressure at 185° C. for 4 hours, thereby to obtain a depolymerized solution containing bis-β-hydroxy ethylene terephthalate (BHET).Incidentally, after the depolymerization reaction at the depolymerization reaction step, solid matters were filtrated and removed by a wire gauze strainer with an opening of 350 μm3. In this solid matter removing step, it was possible to mainly remove different types of plastics other than polyester.The resulting depolymerized solution after filtration was fed to a distillation column, and a depolymerized solution concentration step of distilling away 300 g of ethylene glycol under the conditions of a column bottom temperature of 140 to 150° C. and a pressure of 13.3 kPa, and thereby concentrating the depolymerized solution was carried out. Then, to 200 g of the filtrated and concentrated depolymerized solution, 1.7 g of potassium carbonate as an ester interchange catalyst, and 200 g of methanol were added. Thus, an ester interchange reaction step was carried out under atmospheric pressure at 75 to 80° C. for 1 hour, thereby to obtain an ester interchange reaction product mixture.After the completion of the ester interchange reaction, the ester interchange reaction product mixture was cooled to 40° C. Then, a solid liquid separation step of achieving solid liquid separation between a cake containing crude dimethyl terephthalate as a main component and a filtrate containing methanol and crude ethylene glycol as main components was carried out by centrifugation.Then, crude dimethyl terephthalate was subjected to distillation under the conditions of a pressure of 6.7 kPa and a column bottom temperature of 180 to 200° C., thereby to obtain purified dimethyl terephthalate (step of separating useful components of DMT components). Further, similarly, crude ethylene glycol was subjected to distillation under the conditions of a pressure of 13.3 kPa and a column bottom temperature of 140 to 150° C., thereby to obtain purified ethylene glycol (step of separating useful components of EG components) Finally, as useful components, purified dimethyl terephthalate and purified ethylene glycol were obtained in a yield of 85 wt %, respectively.Purified dimethyl terephthalate recovered from the ester interchange reaction product mixture bore comparison with commercially available products in terms of the inspection items such as outward appearance, acid value, melt colorimetry, and sulfuric acid ash content. Whereas, the purified ethylene glycol recovered from the ester interchange reaction product mixture bore comparison with commercially available products in terms of the inspection items such as diethylene glycol content and moisture content. Further, any nitrogen content of the recovered purified dimethyl terephthalate and the recovered purified ethylene glycol was equal to, or lower than the lower detection limit. Thus, high purity useful components were obtained.Whereas, 1200 g of the dye-containing paraxylene obtained in the dye extraction step was distilled under the conditions of a column bottom temperature of 120 to 130° C. and a pressure of 40.0 kPa, so that 1100 g thereof was obtained as a distilled component. For such paraxylene obtained in the extracting solvent recovery step, the coloration due to mixing of a dye was not observed in outward appearance, and the nitrogen content was also equal to, or lower than the lower detection limit. As a result of these operations, it was possible to recover paraxylene in such a purity as to allow reuse thereof as an extracting solvent.Whereas, 600 g of the dye-containing ethylene glycol obtained in the dye extraction step was distilled under the conditions of a column bottom temperature of 140 to 150° C. and a pressure of 13.3 kPa, so that 536 g thereof was obtained as a distilled component. For such ethylene glycol obtained in the extracting solvent recovery step, the coloration due to mixing of a dye was not observed in outward appearance, and the nitrogen content was also equal to, or lower than the lower detection limit. As a result of these operations, it was possible to recover ethylene glycol in such a purity as to allow reuse thereof as an extracting solvent or a raw material for polyethylene terephthalate.Example 2100 g of cut pieces of polyethylene terephthalate fabric dyed in black (nitrogen content in fabric prior to dye extraction: 900 ppm) which was a dyed polyester fiber to be subjected to the method of the invention, and 600 g of ethylene glycol were charged into a 2 L separable flask. A dye extraction step was carried out by performing heating and stirring under atmospheric pressure at 170° C. for 10 minutes. After the completion of extraction, as a solid liquid separation step, suction filtration with an aspirator was carried out, thereby to separate a dye-containing ethylene glycol from the fabric from which the dye had been extracted (dye-extracted polyester fiber).Thereafter, the dye-extracted polyester fiber and 600 g of another paraxylene were charged into a separable flask, and for extraction of the dye, a step of extracting the dye was carried out by performing heating and stirring under atmospheric pressure at 130° C. for 10 minutes. After the completion of extraction, solid liquid separation was carried out again, thereby to separate a dye-containing paraxylene and the fabric from which the dye had been extracted and removed.Subsequently, about 100 g of the fabric from which the dye had been extracted and removed and 600 g of another paraxylene were charged into a separable flask. Then, extraction of the dye was carried out under the same conditions. After the completion of extraction, solid liquid separation was carried out again, thereby to separate a dye-containing paraxylene from the fabric from which the dye had been extracted and removed.Subsequently, as a depolymerization reaction step, 100 g of the dye-extracted fabric was charged into a mixture of 400 g of ethylene glycol preheated up to 185° C., and 3 g of potassium carbonate as a depolymerization catalyst. That was allowed to react under atmospheric pressure at 185° C. for 4 hours, thereby to obtain a depolymerized solution containing bis-β-hydroxy ethylene terephthalate (BHET). Thereafter, in the same manner as in Example 1, through the solid matter removing step, the depolymerized solution concentration step, the ester interchange reaction step, the solid liquid separation step, and step of separating useful components of DMT components, finally, dimethyl terephthalate was obtained in a yield of 87 wt %, and ethylene glycol was obtained in a yield of 84 wt % as useful components.The dimethyl terephthalate recovered from the ester interchange reaction product mixture bore comparison with commercially available products in terms of the inspection items such as outward appearance, acid value, melt colorimetry, and sulfuric acid ash content. Whereas, the ethylene glycol recovered from the ester interchange reaction product mixture bore comparison with commercially available products in terms of the inspection items such as diethylene glycol content and moisture content. Further, any nitrogen content of the recovered dimethyl terephthalate and the recovered ethylene glycol was equal to, or lower than the lower detection limit. Thus, high purity useful components were obtained.Whereas, 1200 g of the dye-containing paraxylene obtained in the dye extraction step was distilled under the conditions of a column bottom temperature of 120 to 130° C. and a pressure of 40.0 kPa, so that 1089 g thereof was obtained as a distilled component. For such paraxylene obtained in the extracting solvent recovery step, the coloration due to mixing of a dye was not observed in outward appearance, and the nitrogen content was also equal to, or lower than the lower detection limit. As a result of these operations, it was possible to recover paraxylene in such a purity as to allow reuse thereof as an extracting solvent.Whereas, 600 g of the dye-containing ethylene glycol obtained in the dye extraction step was distilled under the conditions of a column bottom temperature of 140 to 150° C. and a pressure of 13.3 kPa, so that 540 g thereof was obtained as a distilled component. For such ethylene glycol obtained in the extracting solvent recovery step, the coloration due to mixing of a dye was not observed in outward appearance, and the nitrogen content was also equal to, or lower than the lower detection limit. As a result of these operations, it was possible to recover ethylene glycol in such a purity as to allow reuse thereof as an extracting solvent or a raw material for polyethylene terephthalate.Example 3100 g of cut pieces of polyethylene terephthalate fabric dyed in black (nitrogen content in fabric prior to dye extraction: 900 ppm) which was a dyed polyester fiber to be subjected to the method of the invention, 600 g of paraxylene, and 300 g of ethylene glycol were charged at the same time into a 2 L separable flask. A dye extraction step was carried out by performing heating and stirring under atmospheric pressure at 135° C. for 10 minutes. After the completion of extraction, as a solid liquid separation step, suction filtration with an aspirator was carried out, thereby to separate a dye-containing ethylene glycol, paraxylene mixed solvent from the fabric from which the dye had been extracted (dye-extracted polyester fiber).Thereafter, the dye-extracted polyester fiber, 600 g of another paraxylene, and 300 g of another ethylene glycol were charged into a separable flask, and a step of extracting the dye was carried out by performing heating and stirring under atmospheric pressure at 135° C. for 10 minutes. After the completion of extraction, solid liquid separation was carried out, thereby to separate a dye-containing paraxylene, ethylene glycol mixed solution and the fabric from which the dye had been extracted and removed.Subsequently, as a depolymerization reaction step, 100 g of the dye-extracted fabric was charged into a mixture of 400 g of ethylene glycol preheated up to 185° C., and 3 g of potassium carbonate as a depolymerization catalyst. That was allowed to react under atmospheric pressure at 185° C. for 4 hours, thereby to obtain a depolymerized solution containing bis-β-hydroxy ethylene terephthalate (BHET). Thereafter, in the same manner as in Example 1, through the solid matter removing step, the depolymerized solution concentration step, the ester interchange reaction step, the solid liquid separation step, and the DMT distillation step, finally, dimethyl terephthalate was obtained in a yield of 83 wt %, and ethylene glycol was obtained in a yield of 82 wt % as useful components.The dimethyl terephthalate recovered from the ester interchange reaction product mixture bore comparison with commercially available products in terms of the inspection items such as outward appearance, acid value, melt colorimetry, and sulfuric acid ash content. Whereas, the ethylene glycol recovered from the ester interchange reaction product mixture bore comparison with commercially available products in terms of the inspection items such as diethylene glycol content and moisture content. Further, any nitrogen content of the recovered dimethyl-terephthalate and the recovered ethylene glycol was equal to, or lower than the lower detection limit. Thus, high purity useful components were obtained.Whereas, a mixture of about 1200 g of the paraxylene and about 600 g of ethylene glycol containing a dye obtained in the dye extraction step was allowed to stand still under ordinary temperatures, and was allowed to undergo phase separation into two layers. The paraxylene phase was distilled under the conditions of a column bottom temperature of 120 to 130° C. and a pressure of 40.0 kPa, so that 1087 g thereof was obtained as a distilled component. For such paraxylene obtained in the extracting solvent recovery step, the coloration due to mixing of a dye was not observed in outward appearance, and the nitrogen content was also equal to, or lower than the lower detection limit. As a result of these operations, it was possible to recover paraxylene in such a purity as to allow reuse thereof as an extracting solvent. Whereas, the ethylene glycol phase was distilled under the conditions of a column bottom temperature of 140 to 150° C. and a pressure of 13.3 kPa, so that 527 g thereof was obtained as a distilled component. For such ethylene glycol obtained in the extracting solvent recovery step, the coloration due to mixing of a dye was not observed in outward appearance, and the nitrogen content was also equal to, or lower than the lower detection limit. As a result of these operations, it was possible to recover ethylene glycol in such a purity as to allow reuse thereof as an extracting solvent or a raw material for polyethylene terephthalate.Comparative Example 1100 g of a polyethylene terephthalate fabric dyed in the same black as that used in Examples 1 to 3 was cut. Then, dimethyl terephthalate and ethylene glycol were recovered under the same conditions as in Example 1, except that the process did not go through the dye extraction step, and the solid liquid separation step. The dimethyl terephthalate recovered from the ester interchange reaction product mixture bore comparison with commercially available products in terms of the inspection items such as outward appearance, acid value, melt colorimetry, and sulfuric acid ash content. However, it contained 11 ppm by weight of nitrogen. Whereas, the ethylene glycol recovered from the ester interchange reaction product mixture bore comparison with commercially available products in terms of the inspection items such as diethylene glycol content and moisture content. However, it contained 45 ppm by weight of nitrogen. Thus, the degradation of the quality was observed.Comparative Example 2100 g of cut pieces of a polyethylene terephthalate fabric dyed in the same black as that used in Examples 1 to 3 and 1000 g of ethylene glycol were charged in a 5 L autoclave. Then, dimethyl terephthalate and ethylene glycol were recovered under the same conditions as in Examples 1 to 3, except that extraction of the dye was carried out by performing heating and stirring under a pressure of 430 kPa (absolute pressure) at a temperature of 240° C. for 30 minutes. The dimethyl terephthalate recovered from the ester interchange reaction product mixture bore comparison with commercially available products in terms of the inspection items such as outward appearance, acid value, melt colorimetry, and sulfuric acid ash content. The nitrogen content thereof was also equal to, or less than the lower detection limit. Thus, it was possible to obtain high purity useful components. Whereas, the ethylene glycol recovered from the ester interchange reaction product mixture bore comparison with commercially available products in terms of the inspection items such as diethylene glycol content and moisture content. However, it contained 15 ppm by weight of nitrogen. Thus, the degradation of the quality was observed. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
70% | Stage #1: 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid dimethyl ester With tris(2,2-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) hexafluorophosphate; trifluorormethanesulfonic acid; C8H9F3NO3S(1+)*CF3O3S(1-) In acetonitrile at 23 - 25℃; for 24h; Sealed tube; Irradiation; Stage #2: With N-butylamine In acetonitrile at 23℃; for 2h; | |
Stage #1: 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid dimethyl ester With sulfuric acid; potassium nitrate In water Stage #2: With iron In water | ||
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: sulfuric acid; nitric acid / 1 h / 20 °C / Cooling 2: ammonium chloride; iron / ethanol; water / 0.5 h / Reflux |
Multi-step reaction with 2 steps 1: tris(2,2-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) hexafluorophosphate / acetonitrile / 1.5 h / Sealed tube; Schlenk technique; Inert atmosphere; Irradiation 2: piperidine / acetonitrile / 14 h / 20 °C / Sealed tube; Inert atmosphere |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
85% | With carbon tetrabromide; oxygen at 20℃; for 20h; Irradiation; | General procedure: Typical procedure: A solution of 4-tert-butylbenzyl alcohol (1a, 0.3 mmol) and CBr4 (0.09 mmol) in dry MeOH (4 mL) in a pyrex test tube, purged with an O2-balloon, was stirred and irradiated externally with four 22 W fluorescent lamps for 20 h. The reaction mixture was concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the crude product by PTLC (toluene) provided methyl 4-tert-butylbenzoate (2a) (Rf = 0.40, 54.0 mg, 94%). |
84% | With bis-triphenylphosphine-palladium(II) chloride; potassium carbonate; benzyl chloride In tetrahydrofuran at 65 - 70℃; for 20h; Inert atmosphere; Schlenk technique; | |
69% | With bismuth(lll) trifluoromethanesulfonate; dichloro bis(acetonitrile) palladium(II); oxygen; potassium carbonate at 60℃; for 3h; Schlenk technique; | 3.16 4.2.1 General procedure for the synthesis of 2 in Table2 General procedure: To a 25-mL Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stirrer, PdCl2(CH3CN)2 (0.05mol, 5mol%), Bi(OTf)3 (0.05mol, 5mol%), K2CO3 (1mmol) were added. Substrates 1 (1mmol) and MeOH (2mL) were added subsequently. The reaction tube was vacuumed and backfilled with oxygen (3 times). Then the reaction mixture was stirred at 60°C for 3h in the presence of an oxygen balloon. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion, the reaction mixture was diluted with water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate. Subsequently, the combined organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure and the crude product was purified by column chromatography with hexane/ethyl acetate to afford the corresponding products 2. |
60% | With dichloro bis(acetonitrile) palladium(II); silver tetrafluoroborate; oxygen; sodium t-butanolate at 45℃; Cooling with ice; | |
58% | With [ruthenium(II)(η6-1-methyl-4-isopropyl-benzene)(chloride)(μ-chloride)]2; (2-((2-(diphenylphosphanyl)ethyl)(quinolin-2-ylmethyl)amino)ethyl)diphenylphosphine oxide; potassium carbonate In n-heptane at 120℃; for 16h; | |
91 %Chromat. | With oxygen; potassium carbonate at 60℃; for 24h; Schlenk technique; Green chemistry; | |
> 99 %Chromat. | With carbon-nitrogen embedded cobalt nanoparticles (800); air In hexane at 25℃; for 96h; | |
65 %Chromat. | With oxygen; potassium carbonate at 70℃; for 5h; Autoclave; | |
85 %Chromat. | With potassium carbonate at 55℃; for 24h; | S6. Procedure for the synthesis of esters General procedure: A magnetic stir bar and the alcohol substrate were transferred to 20 mL glass tube and then 2 mL of MeOH oralcohol was added. Then, 35 mg catalyst and 10 mol% of K2CO3 were added. The glass tube containingreaction mixture was fitted with septum and connected to a balloon containing one bar air. Then the glass tubewas placed into a preheated aluminum block at 60°C. Temperature inside the reaction tube was measured tobe 55 oC and this temperature has been taken as the reaction temperature. After completion of the reaction,the glass tube was cooled down to room temperature. Af terwards, the catalyst was f iltered-off and washedwith methanol. The solvent from the filtrate containing the reaction products was removed in vacuum and thecorresponding ester was purified by column chromatography. Products were analyzed by GC-MS and NMRspectroscopy analysis. In the case of yields determined the by GC, 100 μL n-hexadecane was added to thereaction vial containing the products and diluted with ethyl acetate. Then catalyst was f iltered through a plugof silica and the filtrate containing product was analyzed by GC. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
34% | General procedure: To a solution of 6 (2.05 g, 14.2 mmol, 1 eq) in dry dichloromethane (50 mL) was added dropwise at 0 C under a nitrogen atmosphere a solution of trimethylaluminium 2 M in hexane (7.8 mL, 15.6 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 0-5 C for 2 h before the addition of a solution of dimethyl terephthalate (8.28 g, 42.7 mmol, 3 eq) in dry dichloromethane (60 mL). The reaction mixture was refluxed for 77 h, cooled down to room temperature and then quenched with water (40 mL). The white precipitate obtained was filtered. The filtrate was decanted and the aqueous layer was extracted with dichloromethane (4 × 100 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine (1 x 100 mL), dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated under vacuum. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography (alumina, dichloromethane/gradient of methanol from 0 up to 2%) to give compound 9 as an orange solid (1.47 g, 4.82 mmol, 34%). mp : 53 +/- 1 C; Rf : 0.5 (Alumina, eluent mixture A); 1H NMR (CDCl3, 200 MHz) delta 0.80 (t, 6H, J = 7.5 Hz, H12), 1.23 (sex, 4H, J = 7.5 Hz, H11), 2.36 (t, 4H, J = 7.5 Hz, H10), 2.58 (t, 2H, J = 6 Hz, H8), 3.41 (q, 2H, J = 6 Hz, H7), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 7.18 (brs, 1H, H6), 7.77 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, H2), 8.00 (d, 2H, J = 8.5 Hz, H3); 13C NMR (CDCl3, 50.3 MHz) delta 11.7 (2C12), 20.0 (2C11), 37.2 (C7), 52.1 (OCH3), 52.2 (C8), 55.6 (2C10), 126.2 (2C3), 129.6 (2C2), 132.3 (C1), 138.4 (C4), 166.1 (CO2), 166.1 (C5); IR (KBr) 3338.31, 2958.68, 2872.95, 1720.19, 1638.61, 1279.96, 735.37 cm-1 MS: m/z = 307.16 [M + H]+; Anal. (C17H26N2O3, 0.1H2O) C, H, N. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
96.1% | Stage #1: 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid dimethyl ester With hydrogenchloride; sodium nitrite In methanol; water at 10℃; for 1h; Stage #2: With aminosulfonic acid In methanol; water for 0.333333h; Stage #3: N-(4-nitrophenyl)-3-oxobutanamide With sodium acetate In methanol; water at 10℃; for 2h; | 1 [0139]Next, a compound (24) was synthesized using thecompound (22) and a compound (23). 40.0 parts of methanol and 5.29 parts of concentrated hydrochloric acid were added to 4.25 parts of the compound (23), and ice-cooled to 10°C or lower. To the solution, a solution in which 2.10 parts of sodium nitrite was dissolved in 6.00 parts of water was added, and allowed to react at the same temperature for 1 hour. Then, 0.990 part of sulfamic acid was added and stirred further for 20 min (diazonium salt solution). 70.0 parts of methanol and 4.51 parts of the compound (22) were added, and ice-cooled to 10°C or lower; and the diazonium salt solution was added. Thereafter, a solution in which 5.83 parts of sodium acetate was dissolved in 7.00 parts of water was added, and allowed to react at 10°C or lower for 2 hours. After the completion of the reaction, 300 parts of water was added and stirred for 30 min; thereafter, a solid was filtered off; and 8.65 parts of the compound (24) was obtained (yield: 96.1%) by purification by therecrystallization method from N, N-dimethylformamide . |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
for 24h; | 32 Comparison Examples 29 to 34Glycolysis of Dimethyl Terephthalate (DMT) at Ambient Temperature with DBU and TBDMaterials. DMT and Amberlyst-15 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received.To a 5 ml sample tube containing DMT (0.48 g, 2.5 mmol) was charged predetermined amounts of EG and a catalyst (DBU or TBD, 0.125 mmol, 0.05 eq.). Three levels of EG were used with each catalyst: 2.84 molar equivalents, 8 molar equivalents, and 16 molar equivalents of EG relative to moles of DMT. After the mixture was stirred for 24 hours, THF (8 mL) and Amberlyst-15 (150 mg) were added to the mixture to quench the reaction and allow the slurry to become homogeneous. Aliquots of the solution were taken for 1H NMR and GPC analysis in order to evaluate the conversion and content. FIG. 12 shows a typical GPC curve of the crude product. Peak labeled A corresponds to oligomers, peak labeled B corresponds to BHET, peak labeled C corresponds to 2-hydroxyethyl methyl terephthalate (HEMT), and peaks labeled D correspond to EG and DMT. HEMT is the intermediate in glycolysis of DMT and has the following structure:The GPC results are summarized in Table 6 below. | |
for 24h; | 31 Comparison Examples 29 to 34Glycolysis of Dimethyl Terephthalate (DMT) at Ambient Temperature with DBU and TBDMaterials. DMT and Amberlyst-15 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received.To a 5 ml sample tube containing DMT (0.48 g, 2.5 mmol) was charged predetermined amounts of EG and a catalyst (DBU or TBD, 0.125 mmol, 0.05 eq.). Three levels of EG were used with each catalyst: 2.84 molar equivalents, 8 molar equivalents, and 16 molar equivalents of EG relative to moles of DMT. After the mixture was stirred for 24 hours, THF (8 mL) and Amberlyst-15 (150 mg) were added to the mixture to quench the reaction and allow the slurry to become homogeneous. Aliquots of the solution were taken for 1H NMR and GPC analysis in order to evaluate the conversion and content. FIG. 12 shows a typical GPC curve of the crude product. Peak labeled A corresponds to oligomers, peak labeled B corresponds to BHET, peak labeled C corresponds to 2-hydroxyethyl methyl terephthalate (HEMT), and peaks labeled D correspond to EG and DMT. HEMT is the intermediate in glycolysis of DMT and has the following structure:The GPC results are summarized in Table 6 below. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 67% 2: 13% | With dichloro(benzene)ruthenium(II) dimer; 2-((di-p-tolylphosphino)methyl)-1-methyl-1H-imidazole; potassium <i>tert</i>-butylate; hydrogen In tetrahydrofuran at 100℃; for 4.5h; | |
With dichlorido-bis[(2-diphenylphosphino)ethyl]amine-cobalt(II); hydrogen; sodium methylate In 1,4-dioxane at 120℃; for 48h; Autoclave; | ||
1: 9 %Spectr. 2: 88 %Spectr. | With tris((2-(diphenylphosphino)ethyl)amino)ruthenium monocarbonyl; hydrogen; phenol In toluene for 18h; Glovebox; Inert atmosphere; Heating; Autoclave; | II.II.8 II.8 Base-Free Hydrogenation of Esters (Dimethyl terephthalate) with phenol as activator In a dry argon filled glove box, a stainless steel autoclave was charged with the catalyst Ru(L)CO (I) (0.02 mmol), and phenol (0.04 mmol) and toluene (12 mL). The mixture was stirred for 30 min at RT. Then dimethyl terephthalate (3 mmol) was added. The argon atmosphere in the autoclave was replaced with H2 by twice pressurization to 30 bar, and pressure release at room temperature. The autoclave was then pressurized with H2 gas (60 bar). The solution was heated at 130 °C (heating mantel temperature) with stirring for 18 hrs. After cooling to 0 °C, the system was vented carefully and purged for 1 minute with argon. The conversion of starting ma- terial was analyzed by GC-MS, using an Agilent Technologies 6890N gas chromatography sys- tem coupled with an Agilent Technologies 5975B mass spectrometer and equipped with an Ag- ilent Technologies HP-5MS capillary column (30 m x 0.250 mm / 0.25 pm). The solution was then evaporated under vacuum to remove all volatiles, and a sample was measured by 1H-NMR in methanol-c^ with 1 ,1 ,2,2-tetrachloroethane as internal standard. 88 % yield of NP1 was ob- tained with a ratio of: 10/1/0.4 of the components NP1 : BDM : DMT respectively. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
24% | With hydrogen;5% active carbon-supported ruthenium; In methanol; at 120℃; under 52476.2 - 57647.8 Torr; for 16h; | Example 1 : Condensed process. Slurry dimethyl cyclohexane-2,5-dione-l,4-dicarboxylate (also known as disuccinate dimethyl ester; assayed by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (proton NMR, 400 MegaHertz (MHz)) as being in form of a bis-enol tautomer in CDCI3) from TCI America (50.0g, 0.219 mol) in 150 mL of methanol, and add 350 mg of Strem 5 wt Ru on carbon (Ru/C) to a 300 mL volume stainless steel Parr reactor fitted with a stirrer, closable side-arm septum port, and needle valve. Seal the reactor, and pressurize it to 500 psig with H2 gas, then vent, and repeat this sealing/pressurizing/venting 3 times to give a H2 gas pressurized and sealed reactor. Heat contents of the reactor to 120 C, and pressurize the heated reactor with additional H2 gas to 1000 psig to 1100 psig with stirring throughout at 800 revolutions per minute (rpm). Observe a pressure drop to about 800 psig, and recharge the reactor with additional H2 gas to 1000 psig to 1100 psig, and repeat this pressure drop/recharging over a 5 hour period. Allow the reactor to run overnight at 1000 psig and 120 C with no further H2 gas uptake. After a total of 16 hours 120 C and 1000 psig, vent the reactor, and reduce temperature to 25 C by cooling the reactor. To the resulting cooled reactor contents add a solution of 1.5 g of NaOH in 30 mL of MeOH through the side-arm septum port, and purge the reactor 5 times with nitrogen gas (45 psig). Heat the reactor contents to 195 C for 2 hours.Observe a increase in reactor pressure to 1000 psig, and maintain this pressure by cautiously venting the reactor through the needle valve. Then cool the reactor to 25 C, and vent the cooled reactor.Retrieve the contents comprising a grey-white slurry from the reactor, and wash the contents with about 400 mL of MeOH. Observe that a residual grey-white solid remains insoluble and is filtered off using a medium-porosity sintered glass fritted funnel. Total MeOH wash is about 700 mL.Remove the methanol on a rotary evaporator to yield 38 g of a crude, light yellow semisolid material(89%); ½-NMR (400 MHz, CDCI3 indicates the material consists essentially of a 1 :2: 1 molar ratio of dimethyl terephthalate to dimethyl dihydroterephthalate isomers to dimethyltetrahydroterephthalate; (and < 1 mol% methyl benzoate). Add 700 mL of MeOH with stirring to this material, and place the resulting solution in the freezer (-20 C) to give 2 crops of white crystals (mp =140 C-142 C) of dimethyl terephthalate (total 10.0 g, 24% yield) (contains a small amount of dimethyl dihydroterephthalate by ½-NMR (400 MHz, CDCI3). delta 8.09 (s, 4H), 3.94 (s, 6H); 13C-NMR (101 MHz, CDCI3) delta 166.23, 133.90, 129.50, 52.36.Chromatographic fractionation of the MeOH liquor (using methylene chloride and flash silica gel) provides, if desired, analytically pure samples of the dimethyl terephthalate; dimethyl dihydroterephthalate isomers; and dimethyl tetrahydroterephthalate. Observe that no identifiable bicyclic lactone by-product is isolated or observed by ½-NMR (400 MHz, CDCI3) or by GC-MS. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
Example 3: condensed process. Load dimethyl cyclohexane-2,5-dione-l,4-dicarboxylate(15.1 g, 0.066 mol), 5 wt Ru/C catalyst (0.200 g, Aldrich Chemical) and methanol (90 g) into a 300 mL volume stainless steel Parr reactor. Purge the reactor 5 times with nitrogen gas (45 psig), then pressurize the reactor with H2 gas to 700 psig. Heat contents of the reactor to 120 C. Adjust reactor pressure to 900 psig with additional H2 gas. Maintain reactor pressure at 890 psig-900 psig by addition of H2 gas. After a total reaction time of 180 minutes, cool reactor contents to ambient temperature and vent the reactor. (If desired, in a separate non-invention run, repeat the foregoing procedure and then heat reactor contents to 200 C for 720 minutes without a dehydration catalyst (e.g., without sodium acetate) to show by GC analysis that there is no formation of dimethyl dihydrobenzene-l,4-dicarboxylate (i.e., dimethyl cyclohexa-l,4-diene dicarboxylate); dimethyl terephthalate; or by-product dimethyl cyclohexene-l,4-dicarboxylate.) Add sodium acetate (0.98 g) to the reactor. Purge the reactor 5 times with nitrogen gas (45 psig), then heat contents to 200 C. After a 1200 minute run time, analyze an aliquot of the reactor contents by GC (area %) and find the contents to contain dimethyl dihydrobenzene-l,4-dicarboxylate (i.e., dimethyl cyclohexa-l,4-diene dicarboxylate diastereomer (A), (7.3%); and dimethyl cyclohexa-l,4-diene dicarboxylate diastereomer (B), (12.8%)); dimethyl terephthalate (29.9%); and by-product dimethyl cyclohexene- 1 ,4-dicarboxylate (30.5%). Continue reaction for an additional 800 minutes at 200 C, and reanalyze an aliquot of the contents by GC (area %) and find the contents contain dimethyl dihydrobenzene- 1 ,4-dicarboxylate (i.e., dimethyl cyclohexa-l,4-diene dicarboxylate diastereomer (A), (3.9%); and dimethyl cyclohexa-l,4-diene dicarboxylate diastereomer (B), (9.4%)); dimethyl terephthalate (34.2%); and by-product dimethyl cyclohexene-l,4-dicarboxylate (34.8%). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
85% | With oxygen at 70℃; for 16h; | |
89 %Chromat. | With oxygen; potassium carbonate at 60℃; for 24h; Schlenk technique; Green chemistry; | |
With oxygen at 60℃; for 12h; chemoselective reaction; |
With oxygen at 60℃; for 24h; | ||
With oxygen at 25℃; for 24h; Irradiation; Sealed tube; | 2.9. Photocatalytic test for esterification Typically, 10 mg photocatalyst and 0.2 mmol benzylic alcoholswere dispersed into 1 mL methanol in a 10mL round-bottom Pyrexglass flask with a sealed spigot and a magnetic stirrer. Prior to illumination,the reaction system was saturated with ultrapure O2 gas(balloon), followed by illumination with a 420 nm LED lamp(50 W) for 24 h. The temperature of the reaction solution was carefullymaintained at 25 C during the entire experiment with ahomemade thermostatic control device. After the irradiation, thephotocatalyst was removed by centrifugation. The chemical structuresof products were confirmed by comparison with standardchemicals and GC-MS. The conversion and selectivity were determinedusing biphenyl as an internal standard. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
67% | With tellurium; bismuth (III) nitrate pentahydrate; 5%-palladium/activated carbon; oxygen In methanol at 60℃; for 8h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 44% 2: 20% | With copper (II)-fluoride In water; dimethyl sulfoxide at 120℃; for 12h; Schlenk technique; Inert atmosphere; Green chemistry; | Experimental Procedure for Cu-catalyzed Methyl Esterification of Aldehyde General procedure: To a 50 mL Schlenk tube equipped with a stir bar was added 0.5 mmol of aldehyde followed by 0.05 mmol of CuF2 (0.1 equiv). A mixture of DMSO (1.5mL) and H2O (1.5 mL) was added, followed by 4 mmol of TBHP (8 equiv).The glass tube was vacuumed and purged with argon three times before it was tightly screw-capped. The reaction mixture was stirred at 120 C for 12 h,cooled to room temperature, poured into brine and extracted with EtOAc. The combined extracts were dried over MgSO4, filtered, and evaporated.The residue was purified by column chromatography (petroleum ether/EtOAc) toafford the methyl ester |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
95% | at 200℃; for 16h;Sealed tube; Inert atmosphere; | General procedure: The synthesis of dimethyl terephthalate (9) via methyl 2-((trimethylsilyl)oxy)acrylate (8), prepared in accord with Leijohdahi et al., Org. Lett., 10, 2027 (2008), is representative. To a sealable tube flushed with argon was added <strong>[6018-41-3]methyl coumalate</strong> (1) (154mg, 1.0 mmol), followed by 8 as a crude mixture (261 mg, 1.5 mmol). The mixture was heated to 200 C. for 16 hours, after which it was cooled to room temperature. The resulting crude mixture was recrystallized from hexanes to afford 9 (165 mg, 85%) as a white crystalline solid: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) delta =8. 10 (s, 4H), 3.95 (s, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) delta =166.4,134.1, 129.7, 52.6 ppm. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
95% | at 200℃; for 16h;Sealed tube; Inert atmosphere; | General procedure: The synthesis of dimethyl terephthalate (9) via methyl 2-((trimethylsilyl)oxy)acrylate (8), prepared in accord with Leijohdahi et al., Org. Lett., 10, 2027 (2008), is representative. To a sealable tube flushed with argon was added methyl coumalate (1) (154mg, 1.0 mmol), followed by 8 as a crude mixture (261 mg, 1.5 mmol). The mixture was heated to 200 C. for 16 hours, after which it was cooled to room temperature. The resulting crude mixture was recrystallized from hexanes to afford 9 (165 mg, 85%) as a white crystalline solid: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) delta =8. 10 (s, 4H), 3.95 (s, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) delta =166.4,134.1, 129.7, 52.6 ppm. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
59% | at 200℃; for 16h;Sealed tube; Inert atmosphere; | General procedure: The synthesis of dimethyl terephthalate (9) via methyl 2-((trimethylsilyl)oxy)acrylate (8), prepared in accord with Leijohdahi et al., Org. Lett., 10, 2027 (2008), is representative. To a sealable tube flushed with argon was added <strong>[6018-41-3]methyl coumalate</strong> (1) (154mg, 1.0 mmol), followed by 8 as a crude mixture (261 mg, 1.5 mmol). The mixture was heated to 200 C. for 16 hours, after which it was cooled to room temperature. The resulting crude mixture was recrystallized from hexanes to afford 9 (165 mg, 85%) as a white crystalline solid: 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) delta =8. 10 (s, 4H), 3.95 (s, 6H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) delta =166.4,134.1, 129.7, 52.6 ppm. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
70% | With potassium bromide In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 130℃; for 12h; Schlenk technique; chemoselective reaction; | 4.2 General procedure for KBr-mediated methylation of carboxylic acid with dimethyl malonate General procedure: To a Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stir bar were added under air, carboxylic acid (0.3 mmol), dimethyl malonate (1.8 mmol) and KBr (0.09 mmol) in DMF (2 mL). The resultant reaction mixture was kept stirring at the required temperature for 12 h. After indicated reaction time, the mixture was cooled down to room temperature. It was poured into ethyl acetate, then washed with water, extracted with ethyl acetate, dried by anhydrous Na2SO4, then filtered and evaporated under vacuum, the residue was purified by flash column chromatography (petroleum ether or petroleum ether/ethyl acetate) to afford the corresponding coupling products with high purity. |
70% | With potassium bromide In N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 130℃; for 12h; Schlenk technique; | 17 In a Schlenk tube charged sequentially terephthalic acid (0.3mmol), potassium bromide (0.09mol), and N, N- dimethylformamide (2mL), with micro-injector added malonate (1.8mmol), the system was sealed in a 130 ° C oil bath was heated with stirring for about 12 hours, after the completion of the reaction, 4mL of water was added to quench the reaction, and then extracted with ethyl acetate (10 mL × 3), the combined organic phases and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate and concentrated by a simple column chromatography (eluent petroleum ether (60-90 ° C)), to give the product of dimethyl terephthalate, 70% yield. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
With tungstated zirconia; In n-heptane; at 225℃; for 5h;Inert atmosphere; Autoclave;Catalytic behavior; | In the examples that follow, a 300 cc Hastelloy-C autoclave fitted with a gas-entrainment stirrer was loaded with 0.5-1.0 g feed, 123 mL solvent and 1-2 g catalyst. At room temperature, the reactor was purged with nitrogen, pressurized with approximately 345 kPa (g) (3 atm) nitrogen and then pressurized with ethylene while stirring at 1500 rpm. The pressure was monitored until a constant pressure was reached (pressure decreases were observed due to dissolution of ethylene) and then pressurized to 2.8 MPa (g) (28 atm) total pressure. The reactor was sealed and heated to 225 C., and held at that temperature for approximately 5 hours. Pressure at reaction temperature was 8.3-11.0 MPa (g) (82-109 atm). The heat was removed and the reactor was allowed to cool overnight while stirring. Analysis was conducted by adding chloroform to the product slurry to dissolve all furanate and terephthalate components. Products were identified by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and comparison to known standards where available, and quantified by GC with a flame ionization detector (FID).; To eliminate water and protic solvent from the reaction, all subsequent tests were completed using n-heptane as the solvent. The solvent was not dried, but water analysis showed that only 18 ppm was present, which is considerably less than the amount of water that is theoretically generated in the dehydration of the bicyclic adduct. All catalysts used were dried at 150-175 C., followed by calcination at 500 C. for metal-free zeolites, or 650 C. for tungstated zirconia. DM-FDCA (obtained commercially) was used as the feed. 0.59 g was used in each run (in 84 g heptane). GC-MS was used to identify products which were subsequently quantified by GC with FID detector. In a blank run (with ethylene but no catalyst-comparative example 2), no products other than DM-FDCA were observed. In runs with catalyst, DM-FDCA appears to undergo trans-esterification with ethylene. This results in ethyl-methyl diesters of FDCA and diethyl esters of FDCA. The desired products, the corresponding ethyl and methyl terephthalate esters, are also observed. Trace amounts of benzoate and methyl-furan esters were also observed by GCMS, but in insufficient amounts to quantify by GC with FID. Generally, ethyl groups account for about 50% of the substituents in the tungstated zirconia catalyzed reactions and 60-75% of the substituents in the zeolite catalyzed reactions.; Tungstated zirconia was also tested as a catalyst (replicate examples 6A and 6B). The catalyst contained 12.5 wt % tungsten on volatile free basis. Prior to the reaction, the catalyst was calcined at 650 C. for 4 hours after drying at 175 C. for 3 hours. 1.6 g of catalyst was used with 84 g of heptane as the solvent and 0.58 g of DM-FDCA. In one of the replicate 225 C. reactions, the furan conversion was 69%, and in the other it was 96%. Both replicate runs had much higher terephthalate yield (22.1 and 15.3%) than the Y-zeolite runs, and higher terephthalate selectivity (32.1 and 15.9%). The mass balance of furan and terephthalate products on the furan feed basis was 53.1% and 19.2% in the two runs. 58% of the ester substituents were ethyl as opposed to methyl in the furan and terephthalate products in both runs. The coke yield was 26% in one of the runs and not analyzed in the other. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
87% | With oxygen; 1-(n-butyl)-3-methylimidazolium triflate; at 20℃; for 0.5h;Electrochemical reaction; Green chemistry; | General procedure: A mixture of [bmim][OTf] (20 mL) and ketone (0.1 mol) in a three-electrode cell fitted with activated carbon fiber as the anode and Pt cathode was subjected to electro-catalytic oxidation at a constant current at room temperature for an appropriate time. O2 gas was charged into the cell through a O2 bomb to a desired amount at the flow rate of 15 mL min-1. A magnetic stirrer was employed during the electro-oxidation. The progress of the reaction was monitored by GC. After completion of the reaction, the organic phase was extracted with dichloromethane (3×20 mL). The solvent was removed and the residue was purified by preparative thin-layer chromatography on silica gel (ethyl acetate: hexane, 1:10) to afford the desired pure product. The rest of the ionic liquid was recovered. Fresh substrates were then recharged to the recovered electro-catalytic system and then recycled under identical reaction conditions. The target substrates were characterized by Elemental analysis, NMR spectra or compared with their authentic samples. Spectroscopic data for selected products is as follows. Dimethyl terephthalate (Table 3, entry 9). White solid, mp: 140-142 C (Ref. [54] 141-142 C). |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
95% | Example 6To a 500 ml four-necked flask, equipped with a nitrogen gas conduit, liquid seal, dropping funnel, stirrer, thermometer, reflux condenser and heating device, was added dimethyl terephthalate 65.88 g, gamma-aminopropyl-(trimethoxy)silane 122.05 g and sodium ethoxide 0.51 g. The mixture was stirred and heated to reflux temperature of 90 - 100 C. After 5 hours, the heating was stopped and the reaction mass was cooled to room temperature, and stirred while adding 0.77g dimethyldichlorosilane and sodium methoxide catalyst through the dropping funnel. The reaction mass was heated to 60 C. nd then heating the separated by distillation byproduct methanol and dimethyl dimethoxy silane, to give a white solid product N, N'- bis [3- (trimethoxysilyl) propyl] diamine terephthalamide 157.4g. Yield 95% |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
92.6% | Stage #1: 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid dimethyl ester; 3-(diethoxy-methyl-silanyl)-propylamine With sodium methylate at 90 - 95℃; for 5h; Stage #2: With sodium methylate; dimethylsilicon dichloride at 20 - 90℃; | 2 Example 2 Example 2To a 1000 ml four-necked flask, equipped with a nitrogen gas conduit, liquid seal, dropping funnel, stirrer, thermometer, reflux condenser and heating device, was added dimethyl terephthalate 194 g, γ-aminopropyl-(methyl)diethoxysilane 382 g and sodium methoxide 1 g. The mixture was stirred and heated to reflux temperature of 90 - 95 °C. After 5 hours, the heating was stopped and the reaction mass was cooled to room temperature, and stirred while adding 1.3 g dimethyldichlorosilane and sodium methoxide catalyst through the dropping funnel. The reaction mass was heated to 90 ° C. By distillng at atmospheric pressure, the by-product methanol and dimethyldimethoxy silane were removed. Then under reduced pressure at 120 ° C distilled off excess material to give a pale yellow solid. Product was cooled N, N'- bis [3-Diethoxymethyl siliyl)Propyl] terephthalamide 474g. Yield 92.6%. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
75% | With lithium methanolate In methanol; toluene at 120℃; for 10h; | 1 Vacuum glass tube in dimethyl terephthalate (dimethyl terephthalate) (1.5 g, 7.72 mmol) and 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanamine (1,4-cyclohexanedimethanamine) (0.4 mL, 2.67 mmol) were placed, here in toluene (15 mL ) and after stirring a mixture of methanol (5 mL), it was added dropwise to lithium methoxide (0.4 mL, 0.89 mmol). And warmed to reflux (Reflux) was allowed to proceed the reaction in the vessel (Silicon oil bath) for 120°C formed. This point is heated to reflux consisting passed 10 hours, and was kept to room temperature. At this time, open the reaction vessel to remove the reaction solvent under reduced pressure by using a filter to remove impurities with methanol (20 mLx 2) and toluene (20 mL x 2). And remaining solvents using a drying oven at 110 for 5 hours to give the compound as a white solid in 75% yield. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
77.3% | With potassium hydroxide In tetrahydrofuran; water at 20℃; for 10h; | 4 Example 4 1 partDimethyl terephthalate was dissolved in 5 parts of tetrahydrofuran to form a solution;1 part of 1,4-butanediol and 2 parts of potassium hydroxide were dissolved in 1 part of water to form a solution;The reaction vessel was charged with 55 parts of dichloromethane,The above two reactant solutions were added dropwise to the reaction vessel at the same time for 10 h,The esterification reaction was carried out at room temperature;After the reaction is finished,Distillation,Washed,Recrystallization operation,80 dried sample,The product of the formula is (C12H12O4) 3,The name is cyclic butylene terephthalate trimer.The melting point, yield and yield of the product are shown in Table 1. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
53.2% | With manganese (II) acetate tetrahydrate In methanol for 48h; Inert atmosphere; Heating; | Preparation of dimethyl terephthalate In 100mL two bottles, anhydrous anaerobic conditions, were weighed 7,7,8,8-tetracyanoquinodimethane And 0.4085 g (0.002 mol) of manganese acetate tetrahydrate,0.1225 g (0.0005 mol) in a round bottom flask,Using anhydrous methanol (about 40 ml) as solvent,After heating for 48 hours,Hot filter,Natural evaporation to get crystals,Yield: 53.2%; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
77% | With polystyrene supported trioctyl methyl ammonium chloride In hexane at 80℃; for 5h; | 5.9 In a test tube, 39.0 mg (0.05 mmol) of PS-TOMAC, 0.5 mL of hexane (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd.)181.2 mg (1.0 mmol) of methyl 4-nitrobenzoate (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.)(1.2 mmol) of glycidol (manufactured by Aldrich), and the mixture was stirred at 80 ° C. for 3 hours. Thereafter, acetonitrile was added and extracted three times with acetonitrile (4 mL).30 mg (0.2 mmol) of biphenyl (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.) was added as an internal standard, and gas chromatography measurement was carried out on a part, whereby the conversion of methyl 4-nitrobenzoate was 97%The yield of glycidyl 4-nitrobenzoate was 92% and the selectivity was 95%. |
64% | With tridodecylmethylammonium chloride In hexane; toluene at 69℃; for 3h; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
92% | With hydrogen In methanol at 200 - 240℃; for 8h; | 1 example 1 A solution of 4.01 g of dimethyl terephthalate in methanol and 42 g of a methanol solution of dimethyl terephthalate was prepared.0.4003 g of the activated-passivated nickel-containing catalyst and 0.8005 g of the copper-based catalyst were added and hydrogenation reaction was carried out at 200° C. under a hydrogen pressure of 4 MPa and stirring at 700 r/min for 4 h. The temperature was then raised to 240°C, the hydrogen pressure was adjusted to 8 MPa, and the reaction was carried out for 4 hours while stirring at 700 r/min. After the reaction was cooled down to room temperature overnight, the catalyst was separated by centrifugation, filtration, and the solution was distilled to obtain 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol product after purification. The yield was 92%. |
91% | With palladium on silica; hydrogen; CuAl0.5Mg In 1,4-dioxane at 250℃; for 3h; | 1.3; 2-28; 1-10 (3) The synergistic hydrogenation reaction of the two catalysts General procedure: Weigh 50mg of the 0.1Pd/SBA-15 prepared above and 100mg of Cu1-Al0.5-Mg1 catalyst and add them to 7mL of 1,4-dioxane,After that, 2g of DMT was added, and pure hydrogen with a pressure of 5.0MPa and a purity of 99.999% was introduced, and the catalytic hydrogenation reaction was carried out with electromagnetic stirring at 250°C for 3h.After the hydrogenation reaction, the product was separated from the catalyst. The product was analyzed by gas chromatography to be 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol (CHDM), and the yield was 23%. |
With Cat.7; hydrogen at 180 - 250℃; | 10 Example 10 Take 0.1g Cat.7 above into a fixed bed hydrogenation reactor,Top of the catalyst filled quartz sand,Copper oxide was reduced by heating to 350 ° C in a hydrogen atmosphere,3h after the temperature was raised to 450 nickel oxide reduction,After 3h activation is complete,Feed pump into the diethyl terephthalate (due to the higher melting point of diethyl terephthalate,It needs to be dissolved in diethyl 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxylate in advance,Dubbed terephthalate content of 20% solution),Start hydrogenation reaction,One-pot two-step catalytic reduction reaction,The first step reaction conditions:Hydrogen pressure 7.0MPa,Reaction temperature 180 ,Raw material space velocity 0.7h-1,Hydrogen, reactant volume ratio of 1200: 1;Without treatment,Directly to the second step reaction,The reaction conditions are:Hydrogen pressure 9.0MPa,Reaction temperature 250 ,Raw material space velocity 0.7h-1,Hydrogen, reactant volume ratio of 1200: 1,After the reaction,After testing,The product is 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol,The reaction conversion was 99.9%Selectivity was 97.2%. |
With hydrogen In 1,4-dioxane at 250℃; for 3h; Autoclave; | 2.5. Catalytic test The DMT hydrogenation was carried out in a 50 mL stainless-steelautoclave. For a typical test, 50 mg of Pd-based catalyst and 100 mgof Cu-based catalyst were reduced in a specially designed quartz tube under H2 flow (3 atm, 99.999% purity, 30 mLmin 1) at 200 and450 , respectively, for 2 h before use. After the catalyst was cooled toroom temperature, 7 mL of 1,4-dioxane was injected to the quartz tubeunder H2 flow and the catalyst was immersed with 1,4-dioxane. Then,the suspension was immediately transferred to the autoclave withoutfurther exposure to air and mixed with 0.5 g of DMT. The reactor wassealed and purged with hydrogen for several times, and then pressurizedto 5.0 MPa (99.999% purity) at room temperature. The reaction wasstarted in an isolated autoclave with stirring (800 rpm) once the temperaturereached 250 . The reaction was stopped after a proper timeand the products were analyzed using a GC (GC-2014, Shimadzu)equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and a capillary column(DM-WAX, 30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm). The initial column temperaturewas set 60 C and kept at 60 C for 3 min, then the column temperaturerose to 220 C at a heating rate of 20 Cmin 1 and kept at220 C for 7 min. The response factor of each component was calculatedusing heptadecane as a standard to calculate the conversion andselectivity. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
75% | With sodium hydride In tetrahydrofuran; N,N-dimethyl-formamide at 100℃; for 2h; | 6.1.2. Preparation of 3-oxopropanenitrile derivatives 2a, b General procedure: 6.1.2.1. General procedure. A three-necked, round bottomed flask(500-ml), equipped with a magnetic stirrer, thermometer, decanter and condenser was charged with the proper ester 1a or 1b (10g),acetonitrile (10 ml, 10 mmol), in dry THF and stirred well, then an equivalent weight of NaH and DMF were added then refluxed to 100 °C for 2 h then left to cool, and filtered washed with petroleum ether. The formed salt was dissolve in ice-cold water and acidified HCl to afford the corresponding 3-oxo-propanenitrile derivatives 2a and 2b; respectively. 3,3'-(1,4-Phenylene)bis(3-oxopropanenitrile) (2a) [33] palebrown powder (EtOH/DMF), m.p:175-177 °C, yield:75% C12H8N2O2,IR (KBr, cm1): n 2549 (CΞN), 1717 (C]O); 1HNMR (DMSO-d6)3.875 (s, 4H, H2C), 8.03-8.07 (s, 4H, H-Ar), 13C NMR (DMSO-d6):29.3 (CH2), 129.9 (CH), 134.4(CΞN), 135.4 (CH), 167.10 (C]O); MS,(m/z): 149 (M, 100.0%),163(38.46%), 212 (25.23%), 104(60.52%);Anal calcd C12H8N2O2 (212.20); C, 67.92; H, 3.80; N, 13.20%; Found:C, 67.88; H, 3.77; N, 13.24%. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
87% | With potassium hydroxide; In ethanol; for 2.0h; | 5.1.2.1. General procedure. A mixture of dimethyl terephthalate, (1) (0.388 g, 2 mol) and <strong>[2345-56-4]3-amino-3-oxopropanoic acid</strong> (2) (0.206 g,2 mol) was stirred in an ethanolic KOH solution (30 ml) for 2 h toafford a yellow solid which was filtered off, washed with ether, andfinally recrystallized from ethanol to give 4-((2-carboxyacetyl)carbamoyl)benzoic acid (3), yellow powder, yield: 87%; m.p. 264-266 C; IR(KBr) numax/cm-1: 3433 (OH), 3325 (OH), 3212 (NH), 1709(C]O), 1685 (C]O), 1626 (CO), 1589 (C]O) cm-1, 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): 3.66 (s, 2H, H2C), 7.92-7.94 (d, 2H, HC, J 6 Hz), 8.23 (d,2H, HC, J 2.4 Hz), 8.32 (s, 1H, HN-D2O exchangeable), 11.53 (s, 1H,HO-D2O exchangeable), 12.03 (s, 1H, HO-D2O exchangeable), 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): 54.3 (CH2), 126.3 (CH), 127.3 (CH), 129.5 (CH),130.4 (CH), 135.2 (CH), 139.4 (CH), 167.2 (C]O), 171.2 (C]O), m/z (%): 223 (M+, 100.0%), 148 (33.2%), 120 (13.2%); Anal calcd C11H9NO6 (251.19): C, 52.60%; H, 3.61%, N, 5.58%; Found C, 52.62%;H, 3.63%, N, 5.55%. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
88% | Stage #1: 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid dimethyl ester With tetrabutyl-ammonium chloride; nitric acid In 1,2-dichloro-ethane at 40℃; for 5h; Stage #2: With acetic acid In water at 90℃; for 7h; | 1.1; 2.1; 3 (1) Preparation of 3-nitro-4-methoxycarbonyl benzoic acid In a 500 mL four-neck flask equipped with reflux, stirring and a thermometer, 200 mL of 1,2-dichloroethane, 1.6 g of tetrabutylamine chloride, and 0.4 mol of dimethyl terephthalate were added, and the mixture was stirred and dissolved. Add fuming nitric acid (0.46mol) dropwise at room temperature. After the addition, the temperature is slowly raised to 40°C and reacted for 6 hours. TLC tracks the end point. Then add 100mL of water and 15mL of glacial acetic acid to the flask, then hydrolyze the reaction at 90°C for 7 hours, cool to room temperature, add 200mL of water and stir to precipitate a solid, filter, wash with water, and dry to obtain 3-nitro-4-methoxycarbonylbenzoic acid (recovered Rate 88%),HPLC detected its purity of 95%. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
1: 40.1% 2: 40.9% 3: 10.9% | Stage #1: para-xylene With manganese(IV) oxide; oxygen at 150℃; Stage #2: methanol | 1-7 Example 2 The catalysts dissolved in the fresh p-xylene added to the oxidation reactor are MnO2 and cobalt acetylacetonate, the total concentration is 350 ppm, the reaction temperature is 150°C, the reaction pressure is 1 MPa, and the oxygen-containing gas concentration is 21%. The operation process is the same as in Example 1. The same, the difference is that the conversion rate of p-xylene is controlled to 50%, The mass percentage of p-methylbenzyl alcohol in the bottom liquid of the initial distillation tower is controlled to 0.07%. The mass percentage content of each component in the reaction solution obtained by HPLC analysis is listed in Table 1. The mass and composition of the obtained initial distillation tower bottom liquid and the content of toluic acid in the top mixture of the initial distillation tower are listed in the table 2. The column bottom liquid of the preliminary distillation tower is rectified, 889.4 g of p-toluic acid product with a purity of 99.0% is obtained from the top of the tower, and 1226.0 g high boiling point column bottom liquid with a p-toluic acid content of 74.3 wt% is obtained from the bottom of the column. Using methanol as the esterification reagent, the high-boiling tower kettle liquid is subjected to an esterification reaction to obtain an esterification reaction liquid whose main components are methyl p-toluate and dimethyl terephthalate, The end point of the reaction is that the content of p-toluic acid <0.5%. The obtained esterification reaction liquid was subjected to rectification and separation, and 1001.2 g of methyl p-toluate with a content of 99.0% and 346.1 g of dimethyl terephthalate with a content of 99.0% were sequentially obtained from the top of the tower. After calculation, based on the input p-xylene, the yield of p-toluic acid is 40.1%, the yield of methyl p-toluate is 40.9%, and the yield of dimethyl terephthalate is 10.9 %, the total yield of the three is 92.0%. |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
94% | With trimethylsilylmethyllithium In neat (no solvent) at 20℃; for 6h; Schlenk technique; Glovebox; Inert atmosphere; chemoselective reaction; | 5.2 General procedure for the synthesis of compounds 4a-4o General procedure: Catalyst 1 (3mol%), esters (0.5mmol, 1 equiv.), and corresponding HBpin (1.0mmol, 2 equiv.) were placed in a 25mL Schlenk flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar inside the glove box. Then the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for six hours. The progress of the reaction was monitored by 1H NMR, based on the internal standard, HMB (10mol%). In all cases, yields were calculated based on isolated yields. |
94% | With [{Ph2P(BH3)N}2C6H4Ti(CH2SiMe3)2] In hexadeuterobenzene at 20℃; for 4h; Schlenk technique; | |
With [(η6-p-cymene){(IMes)P}RuCl] In neat (no solvent) at 70℃; for 12h; Schlenk technique; Glovebox; Inert atmosphere; Overall yield = 83 percentSpectr.; |
Yield | Reaction Conditions | Operation in experiment |
---|---|---|
72% | Stage #1: p-tolylsulfinyl amide With n-butyllithium In tetrahydrofuran; hexane at -78℃; for 0.166667h; Schlenk technique; Stage #2: 1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid dimethyl ester In tetrahydrofuran; hexane at -78 - 50℃; for 5h; Schlenk technique; |
Tags: 120-61-6 synthesis path| 120-61-6 SDS| 120-61-6 COA| 120-61-6 purity| 120-61-6 application| 120-61-6 NMR| 120-61-6 COA| 120-61-6 structure
[ 713-57-5 ]
4-(Ethoxycarbonyl)benzoic acid
Similarity: 0.95
Precautionary Statements-General | |
Code | Phrase |
P101 | If medical advice is needed,have product container or label at hand. |
P102 | Keep out of reach of children. |
P103 | Read label before use |
Prevention | |
Code | Phrase |
P201 | Obtain special instructions before use. |
P202 | Do not handle until all safety precautions have been read and understood. |
P210 | Keep away from heat/sparks/open flames/hot surfaces. - No smoking. |
P211 | Do not spray on an open flame or other ignition source. |
P220 | Keep/Store away from clothing/combustible materials. |
P221 | Take any precaution to avoid mixing with combustibles |
P222 | Do not allow contact with air. |
P223 | Keep away from any possible contact with water, because of violent reaction and possible flash fire. |
P230 | Keep wetted |
P231 | Handle under inert gas. |
P232 | Protect from moisture. |
P233 | Keep container tightly closed. |
P234 | Keep only in original container. |
P235 | Keep cool |
P240 | Ground/bond container and receiving equipment. |
P241 | Use explosion-proof electrical/ventilating/lighting/equipment. |
P242 | Use only non-sparking tools. |
P243 | Take precautionary measures against static discharge. |
P244 | Keep reduction valves free from grease and oil. |
P250 | Do not subject to grinding/shock/friction. |
P251 | Pressurized container: Do not pierce or burn, even after use. |
P260 | Do not breathe dust/fume/gas/mist/vapours/spray. |
P261 | Avoid breathing dust/fume/gas/mist/vapours/spray. |
P262 | Do not get in eyes, on skin, or on clothing. |
P263 | Avoid contact during pregnancy/while nursing. |
P264 | Wash hands thoroughly after handling. |
P265 | Wash skin thouroughly after handling. |
P270 | Do not eat, drink or smoke when using this product. |
P271 | Use only outdoors or in a well-ventilated area. |
P272 | Contaminated work clothing should not be allowed out of the workplace. |
P273 | Avoid release to the environment. |
P280 | Wear protective gloves/protective clothing/eye protection/face protection. |
P281 | Use personal protective equipment as required. |
P282 | Wear cold insulating gloves/face shield/eye protection. |
P283 | Wear fire/flame resistant/retardant clothing. |
P284 | Wear respiratory protection. |
P285 | In case of inadequate ventilation wear respiratory protection. |
P231 + P232 | Handle under inert gas. Protect from moisture. |
P235 + P410 | Keep cool. Protect from sunlight. |
Response | |
Code | Phrase |
P301 | IF SWALLOWED: |
P304 | IF INHALED: |
P305 | IF IN EYES: |
P306 | IF ON CLOTHING: |
P307 | IF exposed: |
P308 | IF exposed or concerned: |
P309 | IF exposed or if you feel unwell: |
P310 | Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P311 | Call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P312 | Call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician if you feel unwell. |
P313 | Get medical advice/attention. |
P314 | Get medical advice/attention if you feel unwell. |
P315 | Get immediate medical advice/attention. |
P320 | |
P302 + P352 | IF ON SKIN: wash with plenty of soap and water. |
P321 | |
P322 | |
P330 | Rinse mouth. |
P331 | Do NOT induce vomiting. |
P332 | IF SKIN irritation occurs: |
P333 | If skin irritation or rash occurs: |
P334 | Immerse in cool water/wrap n wet bandages. |
P335 | Brush off loose particles from skin. |
P336 | Thaw frosted parts with lukewarm water. Do not rub affected area. |
P337 | If eye irritation persists: |
P338 | Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. |
P340 | Remove victim to fresh air and keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. |
P341 | If breathing is difficult, remove victim to fresh air and keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. |
P342 | If experiencing respiratory symptoms: |
P350 | Gently wash with plenty of soap and water. |
P351 | Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. |
P352 | Wash with plenty of soap and water. |
P353 | Rinse skin with water/shower. |
P360 | Rinse immediately contaminated clothing and skin with plenty of water before removing clothes. |
P361 | Remove/Take off immediately all contaminated clothing. |
P362 | Take off contaminated clothing and wash before reuse. |
P363 | Wash contaminated clothing before reuse. |
P370 | In case of fire: |
P371 | In case of major fire and large quantities: |
P372 | Explosion risk in case of fire. |
P373 | DO NOT fight fire when fire reaches explosives. |
P374 | Fight fire with normal precautions from a reasonable distance. |
P376 | Stop leak if safe to do so. Oxidising gases (section 2.4) 1 |
P377 | Leaking gas fire: Do not extinguish, unless leak can be stopped safely. |
P378 | |
P380 | Evacuate area. |
P381 | Eliminate all ignition sources if safe to do so. |
P390 | Absorb spillage to prevent material damage. |
P391 | Collect spillage. Hazardous to the aquatic environment |
P301 + P310 | IF SWALLOWED: Immediately call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P301 + P312 | IF SWALLOWED: call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician IF you feel unwell. |
P301 + P330 + P331 | IF SWALLOWED: Rinse mouth. Do NOT induce vomiting. |
P302 + P334 | IF ON SKIN: Immerse in cool water/wrap in wet bandages. |
P302 + P350 | IF ON SKIN: Gently wash with plenty of soap and water. |
P303 + P361 + P353 | IF ON SKIN (or hair): Remove/Take off Immediately all contaminated clothing. Rinse SKIN with water/shower. |
P304 + P312 | IF INHALED: Call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician if you feel unwell. |
P304 + P340 | IF INHALED: Remove victim to fresh air and Keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. |
P304 + P341 | IF INHALED: If breathing is difficult, remove victim to fresh air and keep at rest in a position comfortable for breathing. |
P305 + P351 + P338 | IF IN EYES: Rinse cautiously with water for several minutes. Remove contact lenses, if present and easy to do. Continue rinsing. |
P306 + P360 | IF ON CLOTHING: Rinse Immediately contaminated CLOTHING and SKIN with plenty of water before removing clothes. |
P307 + P311 | IF exposed: call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P308 + P313 | IF exposed or concerned: Get medical advice/attention. |
P309 + P311 | IF exposed or if you feel unwell: call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P332 + P313 | IF SKIN irritation occurs: Get medical advice/attention. |
P333 + P313 | IF SKIN irritation or rash occurs: Get medical advice/attention. |
P335 + P334 | Brush off loose particles from skin. Immerse in cool water/wrap in wet bandages. |
P337 + P313 | IF eye irritation persists: Get medical advice/attention. |
P342 + P311 | IF experiencing respiratory symptoms: call a POISON CENTER or doctor/physician. |
P370 + P376 | In case of fire: Stop leak if safe to Do so. |
P370 + P378 | In case of fire: |
P370 + P380 | In case of fire: Evacuate area. |
P370 + P380 + P375 | In case of fire: Evacuate area. Fight fire remotely due to the risk of explosion. |
P371 + P380 + P375 | In case of major fire and large quantities: Evacuate area. Fight fire remotely due to the risk of explosion. |
Storage | |
Code | Phrase |
P401 | |
P402 | Store in a dry place. |
P403 | Store in a well-ventilated place. |
P404 | Store in a closed container. |
P405 | Store locked up. |
P406 | Store in corrosive resistant/ container with a resistant inner liner. |
P407 | Maintain air gap between stacks/pallets. |
P410 | Protect from sunlight. |
P411 | |
P412 | Do not expose to temperatures exceeding 50 oC/ 122 oF. |
P413 | |
P420 | Store away from other materials. |
P422 | |
P402 + P404 | Store in a dry place. Store in a closed container. |
P403 + P233 | Store in a well-ventilated place. Keep container tightly closed. |
P403 + P235 | Store in a well-ventilated place. Keep cool. |
P410 + P403 | Protect from sunlight. Store in a well-ventilated place. |
P410 + P412 | Protect from sunlight. Do not expose to temperatures exceeding 50 oC/122oF. |
P411 + P235 | Keep cool. |
Disposal | |
Code | Phrase |
P501 | Dispose of contents/container to ... |
P502 | Refer to manufacturer/supplier for information on recovery/recycling |
Physical hazards | |
Code | Phrase |
H200 | Unstable explosive |
H201 | Explosive; mass explosion hazard |
H202 | Explosive; severe projection hazard |
H203 | Explosive; fire, blast or projection hazard |
H204 | Fire or projection hazard |
H205 | May mass explode in fire |
H220 | Extremely flammable gas |
H221 | Flammable gas |
H222 | Extremely flammable aerosol |
H223 | Flammable aerosol |
H224 | Extremely flammable liquid and vapour |
H225 | Highly flammable liquid and vapour |
H226 | Flammable liquid and vapour |
H227 | Combustible liquid |
H228 | Flammable solid |
H229 | Pressurized container: may burst if heated |
H230 | May react explosively even in the absence of air |
H231 | May react explosively even in the absence of air at elevated pressure and/or temperature |
H240 | Heating may cause an explosion |
H241 | Heating may cause a fire or explosion |
H242 | Heating may cause a fire |
H250 | Catches fire spontaneously if exposed to air |
H251 | Self-heating; may catch fire |
H252 | Self-heating in large quantities; may catch fire |
H260 | In contact with water releases flammable gases which may ignite spontaneously |
H261 | In contact with water releases flammable gas |
H270 | May cause or intensify fire; oxidizer |
H271 | May cause fire or explosion; strong oxidizer |
H272 | May intensify fire; oxidizer |
H280 | Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated |
H281 | Contains refrigerated gas; may cause cryogenic burns or injury |
H290 | May be corrosive to metals |
Health hazards | |
Code | Phrase |
H300 | Fatal if swallowed |
H301 | Toxic if swallowed |
H302 | Harmful if swallowed |
H303 | May be harmful if swallowed |
H304 | May be fatal if swallowed and enters airways |
H305 | May be harmful if swallowed and enters airways |
H310 | Fatal in contact with skin |
H311 | Toxic in contact with skin |
H312 | Harmful in contact with skin |
H313 | May be harmful in contact with skin |
H314 | Causes severe skin burns and eye damage |
H315 | Causes skin irritation |
H316 | Causes mild skin irritation |
H317 | May cause an allergic skin reaction |
H318 | Causes serious eye damage |
H319 | Causes serious eye irritation |
H320 | Causes eye irritation |
H330 | Fatal if inhaled |
H331 | Toxic if inhaled |
H332 | Harmful if inhaled |
H333 | May be harmful if inhaled |
H334 | May cause allergy or asthma symptoms or breathing difficulties if inhaled |
H335 | May cause respiratory irritation |
H336 | May cause drowsiness or dizziness |
H340 | May cause genetic defects |
H341 | Suspected of causing genetic defects |
H350 | May cause cancer |
H351 | Suspected of causing cancer |
H360 | May damage fertility or the unborn child |
H361 | Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child |
H361d | Suspected of damaging the unborn child |
H362 | May cause harm to breast-fed children |
H370 | Causes damage to organs |
H371 | May cause damage to organs |
H372 | Causes damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure |
H373 | May cause damage to organs through prolonged or repeated exposure |
Environmental hazards | |
Code | Phrase |
H400 | Very toxic to aquatic life |
H401 | Toxic to aquatic life |
H402 | Harmful to aquatic life |
H410 | Very toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects |
H411 | Toxic to aquatic life with long-lasting effects |
H412 | Harmful to aquatic life with long-lasting effects |
H413 | May cause long-lasting harmful effects to aquatic life |
H420 | Harms public health and the environment by destroying ozone in the upper atmosphere |
Sorry,this product has been discontinued.
Home
* Country/Region
* Quantity Required :
* Cat. No.:
* CAS No :
* Product Name :
* Additional Information :